Exactly. Is this the same Harry that wrote all those other posts?
And, Harry, wherever you are:
One last time. In the desperate hope that Harry will somehow understand this point: The civil and the criminal aspects are two different things entirely. Apples and oranges.
Some of the same facts may be involved in either or both, but they are NOT the same. Double Jeopardy means you cannot be charged criminally for the same crime more than once.
But civil torts involve different issues than criminal charges, thus they are NOT the SAME. Generally speaking, the outcome of a criminal proceeding cannot be introduced into a civil trial as proof of tortuous wrongdoing. Therefore, the same or similar elements have to be proven independently of the criminal verdict. And it works both ways. The verdict in a criminal matter (if there is one) cannot be used as proof that an actor is not responsible for tortuous wrongdoing. So, there must be separate proceedings.
Regardless of how you slice it, a person may be held civilly responsible for his/her actions whether or not he/she is charged with a crime arising from the same incident and regardless of the outcome of the criminal trial.
You don't have to take my word for it. Look it up.