Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

Lownslow

Members
  • Posts

    4,298
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Lownslow

  1. No, not because some of us don't like the look, but because 1) jacking a car way up raises its center of gravity and makes it lean horribly in turns 2) bolting on huge amounts of unsprung weight pretty well defeats the purpose of suspension, makes a car ride like a buckboard, and makes it unstable over any kind of irregular pavement and 3) the huge rotational mass of these oh-so-tall wheels makes acceleration sluggish, and makes the brakes have to work a lot harder to stop the thing.

    These are big-boy concepts that come under the general heading of physics, and are very important aspects of vehicle dynamics.

    In short, going for the donk "look" takes vehicles that were hardly brilliant from a handling and braking standpoint to start with, and makes them cartoonish evil-handling junk.

    Modifications as shown below take a car that handled well originally, and make it better...not worse, WAY worse. Kinda the whole idea of the pro-touring thing, you know?

                         11938187335_4d065a6bfc_b.jpg

    65-Corvette-23-copy.jpg

    You know the chevelle is on air rides right? That being said suspension that isnt actually connected to the car is just as bad and a failure on the road will end very badly, like i said your out of date with donks most have performance suspensions and brakes.

  2. Sorry guys. Resin casting these is the only way to make them affordable and no aftermarket casters have shown any interest at all in picking them up. I did the aftermarket parts dance for 15 years with MAS. I got VERY burnt out and don't want to get back into that routine. If ANY casters are interested in doing these holler. I will give you a deal on the masters!

    Mark

    Bummer was looking forward to them, the market for wheels gets flaky under 22" which is why wont go under 20" for muscle cars.

×
×
  • Create New...