JAFFA Posted August 8, 2008 Posted August 8, 2008 Noone's got thisone yet tho : and i'll throw this one in:
Nick F40 Posted August 11, 2008 Author Posted August 11, 2008 I know for a fact that it was guessed...a WHILE back. That bottom one looks like an Edsel concept or something Okay here is a hard one. Year make model/class and powerplant. Ok, I have done tons of searching, trying to type stuff in and typing in every manufacter and chassis companies that I could think of or came to mind and for the life of me I just can't figure out what it is! I know it's an LMP or prototype and Porsche but can't fugure it out. you suck Chris
CAL Posted August 11, 2008 Posted August 11, 2008 I know for a fact that it was guessed...a WHILE back. That bottom one looks like an Edsel concept or something Ok, I have done tons of searching, trying to type stuff in and typing in every manufacter and chassis companies that I could think of or came to mind and for the life of me I just can't figure out what it is! I know it's an LMP or prototype and Porsche but can't fugure it out. you suck Chris Heheheheh.... Oh come on it's not THAT hard.
lordairgtar Posted August 11, 2008 Posted August 11, 2008 and i'll throw this one in: It's an Edsel design study before they nailed the final look of the car.
CAL Posted August 11, 2008 Posted August 11, 2008 1998 Porsche LMP? 956? 962? Fabcar? 98 Porsche LMP? That would have been the GT1 911. It's like a baby 956/962 Correct, it's not a Porsche it's a Fabcar. It's should be donunts from here... you wont even need a fork.
Nick F40 Posted August 11, 2008 Author Posted August 11, 2008 Well, after some more research, "Google", I came across Fabcar and remembered they used Porsche engines a lot and after studying some 962/956, there were HUGE similarities, so I thought about them, It is a baby version.......................No fork? Cherry have anything with it? March I guess?
CAL Posted August 11, 2008 Posted August 11, 2008 Well, after some more research, "Google", I came across Fabcar and remembered they used Porsche engines a lot and after studying some 962/956, there were HUGE similarities, so I thought about them, It is a baby version.......................No fork? Cherry have anything with it? March I guess? Well they were basically the same car. The difference was in the 962 to comply with the rule chance stating that the driver could not extend past the front wheels. A lot people thought it was to keep the dominate 956 from the series thinking Porsche wouldn't build an entirely new GTP car. No cherrys no March. It was an IMSA car. So to recap. You don't have the year right, Fabcar is the correct make, no model/class, Porsche engine.
JAFFA Posted August 11, 2008 Posted August 11, 2008 It's an Edsel design study before they nailed the final look of the car. Correctomundo! I'm way out of my league here, aint i...?...
Harold Posted August 12, 2008 Posted August 12, 2008 Noone's got thisone yet tho : I'm gonna kill the jerk that did that to a '59 Skyliner!!!
Nick F40 Posted August 12, 2008 Author Posted August 12, 2008 Well they were basically the same car. The difference was in the 962 to comply with the rule chance stating that the driver could not extend past the front wheels. A lot people thought it was to keep the dominate 956 from the series thinking Porsche wouldn't build an entirely new GTP car. No cherrys no March. It was an IMSA car. So to recap. You don't have the year right, Fabcar is the correct make, no model/class, Porsche engine. I never said the year it's a freakin Fabcar built IMSA car that had a Porsche engine, turbo?, and made in the years from 1980 and 2000
CAL Posted August 12, 2008 Posted August 12, 2008 I never said the year it's a freakin Fabcar built IMSA car that had a Porsche engine, turbo?, and made in the years from 1980 and 2000 Yeah, you said some 98 LMP car... Yup it's a Fabcar. Yup it was turbocharged. Come on man.... It race with the suffering Toyota Eagle.
Nick F40 Posted August 13, 2008 Author Posted August 13, 2008 (edited) 1987 Fabcar CL Porsche Type 962/72 or 901 with a flat six 2v SOHC 2994cc Turbo what now boy? Edited August 13, 2008 by Nick F40
CAL Posted August 13, 2008 Posted August 13, 2008 1987 Fabcar CL Porsche Type 962/72 or 901 with a flat six 2v SOHC 2994cc Turbo what now boy?
CAL Posted August 13, 2008 Posted August 13, 2008 1987 Fabcar CL Porsche Type 962/72 or 901 with a flat six 2v SOHC 2994cc Turbo what now boy? Sorry that is incorrect guess again.
Nick F40 Posted August 13, 2008 Author Posted August 13, 2008 yeah but thats pretty darn close right? hey at least you could know the colors on my Audi IMSA, this is! Technically I could be right considering it was a PROTOTYPE!!
CAL Posted August 13, 2008 Posted August 13, 2008 (edited) yeah but thats pretty darn close right? hey at least you could know the colors on my Audi IMSA, this is! Technically I could be right considering it was a PROTOTYPE!! Close but not really. Wrong year, model/class, engine displacement It is a prototype but that is obvious. A 901 was what the 911 was originally designated before being sued by Peugeot Here is an actual 901 And I believe the 972 was a 911 GT3 Cup car. Edited August 13, 2008 by CAL
CAL Posted August 13, 2008 Posted August 13, 2008 How about 1986 fabcar/porsche GTP-L? Ding Ding Ding we have a winner. Yes, a 86 Fabcar GTP-L or if you prefer a Camel Light GT.
Nick F40 Posted August 13, 2008 Author Posted August 13, 2008 CL PL same thing, so I was one year off I was actually thinking Camel Light GT because these cars competed in the Lights category. Hey he didn't say the engine displacement, come on Chris at least give me credit, he's how much older?
CAL Posted August 13, 2008 Posted August 13, 2008 CL PL same thing, so I was one year off I was actually thinking Camel Light GT because these cars competed in the Lights category. Hey he didn't say the engine displacement, come on Chris at least give me credit, he's how much older? CL didn't register for some reason. I just always think of them as Camel Light GT and not GTP-L and never saw them listed as GTCLs or wait... um CLGT Okay you were close, you didn't have the correct displacement. The 901 guess was funny. You were just all over the map one this one It's okay. Are you ever going to solve the green one?
Nick F40 Posted August 13, 2008 Author Posted August 13, 2008 (edited) Hey come on at least my Audi had recognizable colors, exhaust outlet and shape, yours is a green fender or panel of some sort! ok here you go Mr. LeClair year make/model/ engine and what kind of car for serious, WHAT NOW BOY?! here's my backlash Edited August 13, 2008 by Nick F40
Nick F40 Posted August 13, 2008 Author Posted August 13, 2008 OK, 3.2 L, flat 6. And Im not THAT old!! sorry man :lol: hey that's what I said excpet more detail so if he accepts this he'll here it!
CAL Posted August 14, 2008 Posted August 14, 2008 Hey come on at least my Audi had recognizable colors, exhaust outlet and shape, yours is a green fender or panel of some sort! ok here you go Mr. LeClair year make/model/ engine and what kind of car for serious, WHAT NOW BOY?! here's my backlash first one is a Mazda RX8 w the new Renisis 13B. no. 2... Some kind of BMW with a I6.. I donno looks broke to me. The coil lead is not connected.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now