carsntrucks4you Posted June 11, 2018 Posted June 11, 2018 (edited) This time it was easy or not. I think it wasn't that easy tahn you though. The only visible between the 4 cylinder and the six cylinder car are the batch on the bonnet. But surprisingly nearly all choose the right car. This is a 1965 - 1969 Porsche 912 and not a 911. Edited June 17, 2018 by carsntrucks4you
warra48 Posted June 12, 2018 Posted June 12, 2018 Let me research this in my book on these. I'll get back to you.
carsntrucks4you Posted June 17, 2018 Author Posted June 17, 2018 The correct answer were sent in by landman DonW ChrisR Red318 Badluck13 Earl Marischal Matt Bacon Lucas van H sjordan2 dw1603 Pete J. matthijsgrit otherunicorn Ace-Garageguy Congratulations
Bainford Posted June 18, 2018 Posted June 18, 2018 On 11/06/2018 at 5:40 AM, carsntrucks4you said: This time it was easy or not. I think it wasn't that easy tahn you though. The only visible between the 4 cylinder and the six cylinder car are the batch on the bonnet. But surprisingly nearly all choose the right car. This is a 1965 - 1969 Porsche 912 and not a 911 Actually, the car in the photo is a pre-'68.
Ace-Garageguy Posted June 18, 2018 Posted June 18, 2018 23 minutes ago, Bainford said: Actually, the car in the photo is a pre-'68. I believe you'll find it's pre-'69, unless you're seeing something I'm not. It was for the 1969 model year that the wheelbase was lengthened by approx. 88mm (about 3.5 inches) to help alleviate tail-wagging handling issues. The fact that this is an earlier car can be seen by the proximity of the torsion-bar access hole to the rear wheel arch. Later cars are the same length overall, but the wheel arch is moved rearward, leaving more space between the round hole and the front of the arch.
Bainford Posted June 18, 2018 Posted June 18, 2018 57 minutes ago, Ace-Garageguy said: I believe you'll find it's pre-'69, unless you're seeing something I'm not. It was for the 1969 model year that the wheelbase was lengthened by approx. 88mm (about 3.5 inches) to help alleviate tail-wagging handling issues. I'm seeing the lack of side marker lights. Also, I believe the wheelbase change was something in the order of 57 or 59 mm (though I do not recall exactly)
Bainford Posted June 18, 2018 Posted June 18, 2018 8 minutes ago, Bainford said: I'm seeing the lack of side marker lights. Actually, I'm going to withdraw this comment. It appears that this was only true for cars imported to the American market.
Badluck 13 Posted June 18, 2018 Posted June 18, 2018 Only reason I knew this thing even existed was because a episode on Wheeler Dealers had one lol....I never knew,I always thought they were 911's...
Ace-Garageguy Posted June 18, 2018 Posted June 18, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, Bainford said: I'm seeing the lack of side marker lights. Also, I believe the wheelbase change was something in the order of 57 or 59 mm (though I do not recall exactly) You're correct...the wheelbase was lengthened about 58mm or 2.3". My previous number was wrong. For whatever odd reason, I had the bore of the engine in my Spyder in my head. I may be also wrong on this, but I believe US cars for '68 had a one-year-only pair of side reflectors. In '69, the existing turn signal housings were modified to incorporate side-markers that complied with US DOT regs, and the separate reflectors were dropped...at least that's the way I remember it...so you got me on that detail too. I can't recall ever actually seeing a 911/912 with the reflectors. I'm supposed to know better than to post without fact-checking, even when I think I'm sure of something. My bad. Edited June 18, 2018 by Ace-Garageguy
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now