Junkman Posted October 15, 2019 Share Posted October 15, 2019 (edited) Well, who is the Junkman around here then? As to why Ertl chose to make these in the wrong shade of yellow I know not. Sadly the model suffered "transport damage" courtesy of the Hermes lackay flingin it over my 7ft high garden gate. I have obtained another one in kit form and will eventually swap the bodies. If I had any confidence in my ability to replicate the black striping, I'd might as well correct the colour. Edited October 15, 2019 by Junkman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Van Posted October 15, 2019 Share Posted October 15, 2019 The real and only Elanor........warts and all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkman Posted October 15, 2019 Author Share Posted October 15, 2019 Oh aye. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vamach1 Posted October 15, 2019 Share Posted October 15, 2019 (edited) It's interesting Ert;l got the 73 grille with the 72 bumper correct. The movie car was a 71 or 72 with the grill replaced with the 73 style to "update" it for the movie release date. I cannot see if they kept the turn signals under the bumper. The information is sketchy on engine but it is believed to be a 351 Cleveland unlike the 302 in the model. The rear bumperettes are incorrect as is the rear Mach1 decal and F O R D lettering. So, if you have a kit I woul recommend a repaint. The hood paint should not be a lot less difficult than a Mach1 or Boss scheme. For the record Eleanor was not a Mach1, it was a sportsroof with the standard hood. While you are at it (if you repaint it) use as many photos of the real car as you can find. The back of the movie car has a Boss like blackout treatment and lower body painted black also. Edited October 15, 2019 by vamach1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkman Posted October 16, 2019 Author Share Posted October 16, 2019 The lower front indicators are indeed present on the model. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vamach1 Posted October 16, 2019 Share Posted October 16, 2019 16 hours ago, Junkman said: The lower front indicators are indeed present on the model. Hmmm. Maybe I have an older version but I do not see any on mine. It's sad that this 1/18 diecast is based on the incorrect 1/25 plastic models. I say that because it is obvious they copied the exhaust system from the kit instead of the correct oval mufflers. While I cannot be 100% sure the movie car did not have resonators, I checked the sprint version of this model and it's the same. Even the sprint is missing the turn signals. One thing they got right was the mud flaps which is quite comical. The sprint and the Eleanor are basically the same model except for the wheels, paint job, interior color, hood pins, flaps and grille. The 1/43 Eleanor is surprisingly more accurate except it should not have the honeycomb rear panel. For comparison here''s the Autoart Mach1 with the correct exhaust system but incorrect chrome (Boss 351) bumper. Other than that it's a much more accurate (but more expensive) 72 Mustang Mach1 as compared to the Ertl versions. So, basically the Eleanor was a bastardized 71 or 72 sportsroof (not a mach1) with a 73 grille and non factory color and non factory blackout paint on the hood and rear. It's no wonder these companies fail to make an accuarate replica assuming they even care. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkman Posted October 17, 2019 Author Share Posted October 17, 2019 I don't think I'll ever spend that much effort on the model. But it's always nice to know the long list of things wrong with it, thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.