Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted

i recently picked up one of the boxed kits on clearance at Hobby Lobby, and having read through this thread i was somewhat apprehensive of finding unusable parts, etc... well; i was SO impressed with the coolness in that box i went BACK and scored two more. mind you that there was no colored glass and no second full tree of chrome, but the sheer load of sixties' performance stuff AND two decent quickchange differentials made it worth every cent IMHO. toss in the new piecrust slicks and i'm grinning like the Cheshire cat. trouble is, i gave away ALL of my thirties' models a couple of years ago... all of my A's and Deuces are long gone......

as far as i'm concerned, AMT (present owners) can reissue any darn thing they want to. i'll be more than willing to buy one, at least.

The boxed kit should have two chrome trees.One for the rail and one for the Fiat.

Look at the bottom of the box.

Posted

two and a third; one extra set of chromed spoke rims and dished rear mags. the tin box supposedly got two FULL trees for those with the extra set of Chevrolet chrome parts. besides, if I turn the box upside down to look at it, the contents will fall out. I'm busily building these critters.

Posted

two and a third; one extra set of chromed spoke rims and dished rear mags. the tin box supposedly got two FULL trees for those with the extra set of Chevrolet chrome parts. besides, if I turn the box upside down to look at it, the contents will fall out. I'm busily building these critters.

Maybe your post should have stated it didn't have a THIRD FULL SET OF CHROME!

  • 6 years later...
Posted (edited)

I thought I remembered this being posted here before, with the extra chrome tree and the three different frames included in the tin one is able to build three complete vehicles with the addition of a few crossmembers. 

20210121_172946.jpg

Edited by Greg Myers
  • 3 years later...
Posted

Just picked up the tin box version of this kit, and I’ve been researching early 60s streamliner dragsters…was the full-bodied car in this set based on a particular 1:1?  

Didn’t find any particularly close matches to it in my research…

Posted

The dragster isn't modeled on any specific car, but there were a number of similar 1:1 dragster built in the late Fifties and early Sixties.  Few, if any, used the clear canopy though.  Most were just left open.

This kit is a masterpiece of model car kit engineering, with all of the interchangeable parts and different designs that can be built with it.

  • Like 5
Posted
6 hours ago, CabDriver said:

Thank you!

I actually meant the other car though - the top car on the box art:

IMG_3866.jpeg.f22897f612608cbfd961080d4b2c38c0.jpeg

Oh, the streamliner! I remember someone posting an old ad from a drag magazine from back then advertising those bodies, but I have never seen a pic of one in actual use. Some came close, but nothing like that. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Daddyfink said:

Oh, the streamliner! I remember someone posting an old ad from a drag magazine from back then advertising those bodies, but I have never seen a pic of one in actual use. Some came close, but nothing like that. 

Perhaps the Glass Slipper may have had some influence over the design of the Double Dragster kit.

5199707820_d3c0f32c03_o.jpg

  • Like 4
Posted
On 7/7/2024 at 5:16 PM, Mothersworry said:

Perhaps the Glass Slipper may have had some influence over the design of the Double Dragster kit.

5199707820_d3c0f32c03_o.jpg

I wondered that too - the Glass Slipper is WAY prettier tho - AMT’s effort is a little clunky by comparison…

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Hey Cabdriver, I think the trans is what was once known as an "In/Out Box."  [I can hear the snickering from the 4th graders now... including me.]

Dropping the clutch would engage the coupling - simply a means of transfering torque to the rear end. 

There must have been a neutral position to start and warm the engine. 

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, Ragtop Man said:

Hey Cabdriver, I think the trans is what was once known as an "In/Out Box."  [I can hear the snickering from the 4th graders now... including me.]

Dropping the clutch would engage the coupling - simply a means of transfering torque to the rear end. 

There must have been a neutral position to start and warm the engine. 

 

Yup

CYCLONE 301 In Out Box Dog Clutch Racing Ford Midget Sprint Car Hot Rod  Vintage

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Ragtop Man said:

Hey Cabdriver, I think the trans is what was once known as an "In/Out Box."  [I can hear the snickering from the 4th graders now... including me.]

Dropping the clutch would engage the coupling - simply a means of transfering torque to the rear end. 

There must have been a neutral position to start and warm the engine. 

 

That’s about what I figured - I tried finding good reference pics online of the exact model that it might represent, but no joy as yet…thanks for the reply!  And thank you too, @Daddyfink!

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...