Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

RM 68 firebird into 69 trans am


Recommended Posts

That would be good even. Do you know anything about the T/A parts fit on the RM body? Seems like a cut and paste conversion to me for the current 68. Just an extra tree of parts no?

Basically it would be the hood, spoiler, nose and fender vent scoops. Likely an interior pattern change?

Edited by freakshow12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's not much in common between '67-8 Firebird and '69 except the roof, tulip panel, and trunk lid (and glass, and possibly cowl--I'd have to check).

The AMT (ex-MPC) '69 Firebird is pretty poor. It was retooled from the fairly accurate '68 molds, but unfortunatately you can't get an accurate '69 body that way. The whole sides of the car are wrong. (The same is true of the MPC '69 Camaro, too.)

To get an accurate '69 Firebird, you'd have to start with a Revell '69 Camaro body and then mod the fronts of the front fenders, the front and rear panels, and so forth. Now it gets interesting because the MPC '69 Firebird body is singificantly narrower than the Revell '69 Camaro. Which means you can't just plop the MPC bumpers, grille, etc onto the Revell body. You'll have to widen all that stuff--or narrow the Revell body.

And THEN you'll prolly want to use a Revell '68 Firebird for the chassis or at least the engine.

I've given a good deal of thought to all this, but the truth is I don't like the '69 Firebird enough to go through all the hassle. It WOULD make a spectacular model if you could pull it off, though, and instantly make eveybody else's '69 Firebird and Trans Am builds look like garbage.

Edited by Snake45
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well there I learned something today. Nevermind. Lol

I just went and looked. Easier to start with a camaro for sure. Didn't realize they were so different. Anyway, what I was getting at was that maybe it's time for one of these in new form

Edited by freakshow12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is a very good idea

Yup. There's a lot of that kind of stuff they could do. They could do both '65 and '67 GTO snappers that could use the full-kit '66 GTO chassis and engine if desired. Quite a few other things they could do in that line--I bet such kits would be good sellers, too.

Edited by Snake45
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup. There's a lot of that kind of stuff they could do. They could do both '65 and '67 GTO snappers that could use the full-kit '66 GTO chassis and engine if desired. Quite a few other things they could do in that line--I bet such kits would be good sellers, too.

Yes, that would be a good idea! I have a ton of Camaro glue kits and snap kits (AMT & Revell) but tend to build the snappers faster as it allows me to fill the display case faster and keep from having detail a full build. I'd have a bunch of GTO builds if they took your advice!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's not much in common between '67-8 Firebird and '69 except the roof, tulip panel, and trunk lid (and glass, and possibly cowl--I'd have to check).

The AMT (ex-MPC) '69 Firebird is pretty poor. It was retooled from the fairly accurate '68 molds, but unfortunatately you can't get an accurate '69 body that way. The whole sides of the car are wrong. (The same is true of the MPC '69 Camaro, too.)

To get an accurate '69 Firebird, you'd have to start with a Revell '69 Camaro body and then mod the fronts of the front fenders, the front and rear panels, and so forth. Now it gets interesting because the MPC '69 Firebird body is singificantly narrower than the Revell '69 Camaro. Which means you can't just plop the MPC bumpers, grille, etc onto the Revell body. You'll have to widen all that stuff--or narrow the Revell body.

And THEN you'll prolly want to use a Revell '68 Firebird for the chassis or at least the engine.

I've given a good deal of thought to all this, but the truth is I don't like the '69 Firebird enough to go through all the hassle. It WOULD make a spectacular model if you could pull it off, though, and instantly make eveybody else's '69 Firebird and Trans Am builds look like garbage.

I took another look at this last night and would like to revise and extend my remarks.

The AMT ex-MPC body is not quite as bad as I remembered (was looking at an original MPC annual, not a more recent reissue). The wheel openings and fender creases are still too low, but for some reason they don’t seem to be quite as bad as the MPC ’69 Camaro. Maybe it’s because the ’69 Firebird isn’t as familiar a shape to us as the Camaro, maybe it’s because there’s no better ’69 Firebird kit to compare it to, maybe MPC actually did a better job on the Firebird than the Camaro (they did have the Pontiac promo contract but not Chevy in ’69), I dunno.

The width problem isn’t as bad as I remembered either. The AMT/MPC ’69 body is noticeably narrower than the Revell ’69 Camaro at the rear, but at the front, it’s not that bad. I think the Firebird bumper etc could be grafted onto the Revell body without TOO much trouble. (I know the MPC Camaro body is much narrower than the Revell in this area.)

I’d forgotten about the front fender vents on the Firebird. If bashing up a Revell Camaro body, you’d have to graft those in in some way.

In summary, I think you could bash the AMT ’69 Firebird and Revell ’69 Camaro bodies and build a more accurate ’69 Firebird. BUT I’m not sure it would be worth all the work. When I get around to doing mine, it’ll be with the AMT/MPC kit body, probably with a few tweaks around the tops of the rear fenders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...