Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

Mark C.

Members
  • Posts

    374
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Previous Fields

  • Scale I Build
    1:25

Profile Information

  • Full Name
    Mark C

Recent Profile Visitors

3,018 profile views

Mark C.'s Achievements

MCM Avid Poster

MCM Avid Poster (5/6)

  1. As a suggestion to the fine folks at Atomic City, if they want to knock this out of the park, and appeal more to the niche market that they are aiming for, they should consider including a bench seat option for those who want to build a correct Fury III version. IMHO, at this price point, it’s neat little options and extras like this that would put people who are on the fence into customer territory. I know we are talking a whole different ballgame, but one of the things I like most about Round 2’s clone projects is that they correct some of the more obvious mistakes or bad points of the original kits. My expectations are lower, of course, for a low production resin copy of an original kit, but the idea that a bench seat from a promo could be copied and included in this kit seems eminently doable, and would perhaps help people justify the extra cost of buying a kit like this. Just my 2 cents, nothing more.
  2. That’s one thing I don’t know… is it a popular thing there, or just some small niche group that happened to gain popularity here because of the internet, the fact that they are using American vans, and the sheer outlandishness of it all?
  3. I would be most happy with a properly done ‘57 conversion kit, including correct interior, and stock engine bits.
  4. I’m a little surprised that one of the Japanese kit manufacturers hasn’t taken on the Dajiban subject, TBH, given its popularity.
  5. All I’m saying is that I think some of you guys are taking this way too seriously. It’s a hobby after all, and FWIW the info that Chris V gave was adequate enough to figure it out. The internet is also awash in negativity, and it would be a better place if there were less of it. Regardless, enough has been said, let’s all have a group hug and move on…
  6. Yeah, I was wondering if anyone might be expecting a catoonized model (like I’ve been seeing in 3D prints), and be disappointed when they find the old ‘57 flip nose in the box.
  7. C’mon guys, we’re all modellers here. Some ideas were given by a fellow modeller to get you started. Buy the kit, measure yourself, and cut appropriately. Figure it out. I see no point in taking the guy to task when he is only trying to help… I’m glad that I am now aware of the issue, but would want to check myself before making any cuts, just because that’s what we modellers do!
  8. I thought the Valiant emblem was an early model year thing that was gone partway through the 1970 model year production run.
  9. He said he narrowed it down to 67mm, which I interpret to mean its total width will be 67mm. Just my take.
  10. Great pics! Does it have hood pins on it? Also it looks like the back of the hood is raised slightly? To let some cooler air under the hood maybe?
  11. Mostly vs OEM, but all inclusive actually. My decision: no biggie! Cheers as well! 👍🏻
  12. I asked earlier in this thread if someone could define the difference, but all I heard was crickets… I guess if I have to ask and I don’t get a bunch of answers, it must be so subtle that most people don’t notice it… so I’m not going to let it affect my decision to get one. Sounds like it should be just fine, but I’m still hoping for a flat hood…
  13. All I can see is that there is more of a gentle curve at the top of the quarter window.
  14. Will definitely be picking up one of the ’32s. Reading the posts from the fine contributors on this forum has pushed me over the line. It’s now on the list.
×
×
  • Create New...