Casey Posted January 28, 2018 Share Posted January 28, 2018 (edited) I'm working on the Revell '41 Chevy pickup kit, and specifically upgrading it to a heavier-duty 1.5 ton version, with the 160" wheelbase and dual rear wheels. I have looked at the GM Heritage site's drawings and info, and I know the frame rails were extended in length and had some L-shaped material added compared to the 3/4 ton Special truck's frame rails, but were new, unique frame rails made specifically for the 134.5" and 160" wheelbase trucks? Or was the additional length and height added, either by welding or riveting (or both?) extra material to the 3/4 ton Special truck's frame? Below are the cross-sections of the frame rails for the LWB trucks, if that helps. Pic #1 appears to show the L-shaped piece added to the side of the slightly thicker (7/32" thick) framerails of the H.D. 3/4 ton Special.. Is it that simple, just add an L-shaped piece on the outside of the existing framerails? How were the two attached? Here's the 50" frame extension for the 160" w.b. option. Are the frame rails the same dimension in this 50" section as where they butt against the existing framerails? I can see the frame starts to taper a little bit forward of the front of the rear leaf springs, but I don't see any cross sectional dimensions for any other section of the frame. I did note the 3/4 Special an larger trucks use a slightly larger (in wall thickness, overall height and width, too) frame rail, so to be correct the rails would need to be modified in all dimensions. Below are two trucks showing the general direction I'm headed: Edited January 28, 2018 by Casey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAT-T Posted January 28, 2018 Share Posted January 28, 2018 CASEY, ANY INDICATION THAT THE NOSE ON THESE SIZE TRUCKS WERE A BIT LONGER? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casey Posted January 28, 2018 Author Share Posted January 28, 2018 1 hour ago, RAT-T said: CASEY, ANY INDICATION THAT THE NOSE ON THESE SIZE TRUCKS WERE A BIT LONGER? NO, NONE THAT I SAW NOR READ. THE FRONT FENDER WHEEL ARCHES ARE DEFINITELY ENLARGED, THOUGH, AND THE LEADING EDGE/LOWER FRONT CORNERS OF THE FENDERS ARE TRIMMED BACK, TOO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aaronw Posted January 28, 2018 Share Posted January 28, 2018 (edited) 8 hours ago, RAT-T said: CASEY, ANY INDICATION THAT THE NOSE ON THESE SIZE TRUCKS WERE A BIT LONGER? No, I have a document saved that I found somewhere that gives the cab dimensions for light and medium duty GM trucks 1941-55. The 41-46 Art Deco style truck cabs did not change between the 1/2 ton and larger models except for opening the wheel arches to allow the use of larger wheels. The 1947-55 Advanced Design trucks did change on the 1 1/2 ton and larger trucks. The fenders were a couple of inches longer, wider, and taller. The hood was also longer to match the fenders. From the firewall back the cab remained the same as on the smaller trucks. Edited January 28, 2018 by Aaronw Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
landman Posted January 28, 2018 Share Posted January 28, 2018 I am going to be watching this as I was planning something similar for my '41 as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAT-T Posted January 28, 2018 Share Posted January 28, 2018 10 hours ago, Casey said: NO, NONE THAT I SAW NOR READ. THE FRONT FENDER WHEEL ARCHES ARE DEFINITELY ENLARGED, THOUGH, AND THE LEADING EDGE/LOWER FRONT CORNERS OF THE FENDERS ARE TRIMMED BACK, TOO. 3 hours ago, Aaronw said: No, I have a document saved that I found somewhere that gives the cab dimensions for light and medium duty GM trucks 1941-55. The 41-46 Art Deco style truck cabs did not change between the 1/2 ton and larger models except for opening the wheel arches to allow the use of larger wheels. The 1947-55 Advanced Design trucks did change on the 1 1/2 ton and larger trucks. The fenders were a couple of inches longer, wider, and taller. The hood was also longer to match the fenders. From the firewall back the cab remained the same as on the smaller trucks. THANKS FOR THE INFO GUYS, I HAVE A TWO 47-53 RESIN CABS I GOT FROM HERB DEEKS THAT HAVE THE EXTENDED NOSE, I BELIEVE HE SAID WERE 1 1/2 TO 2 1/2 TON, GOOD INFO AARON, THANKS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aaronw Posted January 28, 2018 Share Posted January 28, 2018 Casey, have you looked at the Stovebolt page? That is a huge reference for old GM trucks, I would be surprised if there isn't something showing the chassis details you are looking for. There are a pile of technical discussions and documents, and a members gallery showing their trucks. There is a "Big Bolts" section specifically for the 1 1/2 ton and larger trucks. https://www.stovebolt.com/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bandit1 Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 Thanks for the info, Now i can move a bit faster and get back on my 41 chev 2 1/2 Ton conversion using an old ALF Pumper chassis... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casey Posted February 4, 2018 Author Share Posted February 4, 2018 I managed to find some pics online showing the frame a little better/more clearly (well, at least the frame wasn't obscured), but I don't want to put all my faith in one 77 year old truck in case this frame was modified from how it was made at the factory. It does appear the taller added frame piece has a rather abrupt step, but the piece appears to continue along the entire length of the frame rail...at least that's how I'm planning to create mine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redneckrigger Posted February 5, 2018 Share Posted February 5, 2018 On 2/3/2018 at 11:03 PM, Casey said: I managed to find some pics online showing the frame a little better/more clearly (well, at least the frame wasn't obscured), but I don't want to put all my faith in one 77 year old truck in case this frame was modified from how it was made at the factory. It does appear the taller added frame piece has a rather abrupt step, but the piece appears to continue along the entire length of the frame rail...at least that's how I'm planning to create mine. I have a real 1946 Chevy 1 1/2 ton stake body truck. It has the same cab as a 1/2 ton or even the 2 1/2 ton truck. The front fenders are larger with a larger radius cut out for the tires, and the 2 1/2 ton truck has an even larger radius cutout than the 1 1/2 ton version. The wheelbase of my truck is the 134 1/2 version and does not have the added on vertical reinforcement plate as shown in the photos above in the quoted post. If there any photos, or measurements that you need, just let me know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casey Posted February 8, 2018 Author Share Posted February 8, 2018 Thanks for the offer, Tom-- I may take you up on that in the future. Looking at the GM Heritage pages for the '46s, your 4109 (model?) is the largest without the added frame bracing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casey Posted February 21, 2018 Author Share Posted February 21, 2018 (edited) Found a pic of a '46 Chevy 1.5 ton truck, showing the frame rails a little better, though his truck appears to have an aftermarket tilt/flatbed added, so who knows what's been changed: Edited February 21, 2018 by Casey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.e0420fe52e683c60d19e843462316523.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.