Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Mark said:

Looks like AMT '65 GTO.

I'm looking at mine right now. Very close but not a match.

AMT GM A-body definitely,  '65 Chevelle or Olds Cutlass maybe? 

Nothing I have anyway. 

Edited by Can-Con
Posted
15 minutes ago, Can-Con said:

I'm looking at mine right now. Very close but not a match.

AMT GM A-body definitely,  '65 Chevelle or Olds Cutlass maybe? 

Nothing I have anyway. 

Which issue are you comparing to?  Early issues have the original chassis, which was butchered for the Modified Stocker issue.  Ertl tooled a new chassis when they restored the stock version.  The one pictured would be the Pre-Modified Stocker original chassis.  I've never seen a later one molded in white.

Posted
13 minutes ago, gtx6970 said:

Screw bottom chassis.

 im guessimg midsize gm ..maybe 65 or 66 impala 

 AMT '65-'66 Impala kit chassis had no floor area under the interior.  The underside of the interior bucket formed that part of the chassis.

Posted
12 minutes ago, Mark said:

Which issue are you comparing to?  Early issues have the original chassis, which was butchered for the Modified Stocker issue.  Ertl tooled a new chassis when they restored the stock version.  The one pictured would be the Pre-Modified Stocker original chassis.  I've never seen a later one molded in white.

One of the later issues. I didn't know they did a new chassis when it was restored.

But then again, you didn't specify which issue. ;):)

I do have a pre- mod stocker chassis but I'd have to dig for it.  

Posted

The one pictured has the two screws at the back, which would mark it as an early chassis (besides being molded in white).  I checked a 1969 reissue (last one before the butchery) and it's identical.  It's not a '64 chassis because those have screw holes in front also.

Posted
1 hour ago, Mark said:

The one pictured has the two screws at the back, which would mark it as an early chassis (besides being molded in white).  I checked a 1969 reissue (last one before the butchery) and it's identical.  It's not a '64 chassis because those have screw holes in front also.

I dug my old one out and it's just as you said. Exact match.

I apologize for the confusion, like I said, I didn't know the chassis was part of the redo on the GTO. 

Too bad they didn't do a better job on the restoration.

Posted

That restoration was the first thing like that, that Ertl did.  They got better on later projects.

Posted

So AMT '65 GTO is the consensus?

 

 

14 hours ago, Dave G. said:

Is this a quiz, It's sitting in a body shell is that not the match to the under body ?

No, the chassis is not correct for the the body which is a '65 Fairlane.

Posted
3 hours ago, afx said:

So AMT '65 GTO is the consensus?

 

 

No, the chassis is not correct for the the body which is a '65 Fairlane.

I see, thanks.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...