Ferbz Posted 6 hours ago Author Posted 6 hours ago On 11/10/2025 at 2:23 PM, Kanada Kustoms said: Nice progress! Thanks!ย ๐
Ferbz Posted 6 hours ago Author Posted 6 hours ago On 11/10/2025 at 6:10 PM, meechum68 said: Oh this is awesome!ย ย Thank you!ย ๐
Ferbz Posted 6 hours ago Author Posted 6 hours ago On 11/10/2025 at 8:14 PM, DumpyDan said: Nicely done, super clean chop.ย Keep us posted! Thank you! I've learned over the years of cutting things up that the cleaner I can make my cuts and the more precise I can measure things out, the btter the overall job will turn out. Not to mention that cleaner mods make for an easier time with paint prep. I certainly will do my best to document the steps on this build!ย ๐
Ferbz Posted 6 hours ago Author Posted 6 hours ago On 11/11/2025 at 4:51 AM, bobss396 said: Sharp trick to slant the A pillar cuts and cut out the rear including the cat walk.ย I reinforce my splices using fiberglass fingernail wraps. Much thinner and thin CA glue holds it well. Fingernail wraps? I may have to look into that! I have been considering with using thinner styrene than my usual .020, like .010 but I wonder how strong it would be. Would I be able to go to any standard beauty supply store and find those fingernail wraps? 1
Ferbz Posted 5 hours ago Author Posted 5 hours ago On 11/11/2025 at 6:50 AM, customline said: Looks like the center slice solves any windshield fit issues. Very good, Ferbs!ย It does! I thought I was going to need to do the same for the rear window opening (I had planned on making two relief cuts in the top, one on each side of the main one going down the center for the windshield). Turns out I was able to nudge (slightly bend) the top halves of the C pillars outward and the bottom halves inward, in order to line them up again. However I still need to sand down the .020 thick styrene plating I used to strengthen the cuts at the pillars to confirm rear glass fitment. I'll wait to do this later. I probably should have switched to .010 thick styrene in this case....to late now! lol๐คช
Ferbz Posted 5 hours ago Author Posted 5 hours ago On 11/11/2025 at 9:20 AM, Spex84 said: This has been very inspiring, thanks! I went down to my stash and pulled out my single Edsel kit, mocked up some custom parts to try out some ideas, and.....nothin'. I just can't get past the headlights, the vertical central grille, the unique taillights, the narrowness of the body. Every idea I try, even some fairly extreme changes, it just fizzles out. Like the '53 Studebaker, I can never decide if the stock '58 Edsel is an incredibly slick design or unbearably awkward. It flip-flops on me like an MC Escher drawing.ย So I'm extremely interested in seeing where you go with this build! Ha! I feel the same way about it. On one hand, the 58 Edsel is a very unique design, which is what makes it 'cool' to me. On the other hand, it is also generally kind of weird and awkward lol As a result, I've challenged myself to see if I can turn this strange car into a slick custom that is rooted in the history of that late 50's era. In the recent past I was able to take a Revell 50 Ford Pickup and tastefully customize it (I think) and improve it's otherwise 'unhandsome' factory look. We'll see if I can do a similar thing with this Edsel:
bobss396 Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 2 hours ago, Ferbz said: Fingernail wraps? I may have to look into that! I have been considering with using thinner styrene than my usual .020, like .010 but I wonder how strong it would be. Would I be able to go to any standard beauty supply store and find those fingernail wraps? Any beauty supply store should have them. The brand is Suisse something. They are sticky on one side, place it down, soak the back with thin CA glue. 1
Ferbz Posted 2 hours ago Author Posted 2 hours ago (edited) 14 hours ago, bobss396 said: Again, there is some pretzel logic going on with model designers. The '59 Edsel looks light years better than the '58. I was at the NNL East when Revell introduced their new '49 Mercury. They were not happy when I suggested that a '51 would have been a better choice. Don't even mention the AMT '41 Plymouth to me, the '39 or '40 is much more pleasing to the eye. I thought the same thing when I saw that Revell had come out with their 49 Merc kit! I asked myself why would they make a 49 when we already have 1949 offerings that exist from both AMT and MPC? Also, aside from the extra custom parts, it's not a very good kit in my opinion: The body is not accurate, and the chop is not done very well as the top sits too high at the B pillarsย ๐๐ Edited 1 hour ago by Ferbz
Ferbz Posted 2 hours ago Author Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, customline said: That's a wicked cool pickup, Ferby! ๐ Thanks!ย ๐
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now