MrObsessive Posted December 24, 2009 Posted December 24, 2009 Okay, I'm trying to update my sig pic and the board is telling me that my signature is too long. Now I was able to change my sig pic a couple weeks ago when I had one of my cat, and there was no problem. This along with the links and a quote at the bottom. Now all I can do is put in my name, and nothing else. Did something change, or am I not being computer geeky enough today?
Lownslow Posted December 24, 2009 Posted December 24, 2009 (edited) someone went running with a yellow post it with a complaint written on it. *coming soon* 3 picture limit per post no larger than 400x600 brought to you by the whiners on dialup Edited December 24, 2009 by Lownslow
James Flowers Posted December 24, 2009 Posted December 24, 2009 someone went running with a yellow post it with a complaint written on it. *coming soon* 3 picture limit per post no larger than 400x600 brought to you by the whiners on dialup Was the remark about people with dial up necessary?
RodBurNeR Posted December 24, 2009 Posted December 24, 2009 seeing if mine is there... it's my name that is an image.
MrObsessive Posted December 24, 2009 Author Posted December 24, 2009 someone went running with a yellow post it with a complaint written on it. *coming soon* 3 picture limit per post no larger than 400x600 brought to you by the whiners on dialup Well phooey on that if it's true! What stops someone (like me for instance in a tutorial) from making 10 posts in a row with three pics?? The effect is still the same. I know some can't get (or can't afford) the cheapest DSL, but that'll be a major annoyance when it comes to posting info which is picture/graphic heavy. Sorry if this puts a bug in someone's ear if they're on dial-up, but that's the way of the tech world these days. Newer computers today are built to take a very high speed connection with no hiccups.
Jon Cole Posted December 24, 2009 Posted December 24, 2009 Yesterday I tried to make a small change to my sig line, and I had the same results. I ended up having to settle for just plain text Merry Christmas to us, eh? An explanation from the powers that be would be nice.
Jon Cole Posted December 24, 2009 Posted December 24, 2009 seeing if mine is there... it's my name that is an image. Bob, whatever you do, do not try to make a change. That is how my sig line went *poof!*
george 53 Posted December 24, 2009 Posted December 24, 2009 Could THAT have been why I couldn't get on about 7/7:30 A.M., on Monday??? I couldn't get in no matter what I did, then "Poof" it started workin right again! I don't have a pic in my sig, but it may suck for the guys that do.
Karmodeler2 Posted December 24, 2009 Posted December 24, 2009 Hey Bill, I knew something was up on Monday because I tried changing it and it said the same thing. I even replaced one of my sentences with "Stop, Drop and Roll won't work in Hell" and it would not allow it, so I left everything alone because of it. I think the huge pics in the sigs may have done it. Maybe the great one himself will explain to the masses. Might be the beginning stages of Government rationing. David
MrObsessive Posted December 24, 2009 Author Posted December 24, 2009 I know some get annoyed with pics that are too big and not cropped and resized properly------I know I do. I try to make my sig pics that are not overwhelming to the point that it shifts the board over unnecessarily. I had a nice one to put up too------------hopefully it is a software glitch!
crazyjim Posted December 24, 2009 Posted December 24, 2009 I have no idea what you guys are talking about with sig pics but I had problems getting on the forum on Monday or Tuesday morning. Later on everything worked okay.
Terror Posted December 24, 2009 Posted December 24, 2009 I'm on dial up.Thats all thats offered where I live.Unless I want to pay a lot of money for satalite and thats not gonna happen.N.Y. took all that money for taxes.And I'm sure as heck not gonna sell my house for any net connection.I don't care if all those pics are in there.If the page takes to long to load I move on to another thread and don't even see the nice work you guys do,is all.Have fun...
vizio93 Posted December 24, 2009 Posted December 24, 2009 Could THAT have been why I couldn't get on about 7/7:30 A.M., on Monday??? I couldn't get in no matter what I did, then "Poof" it started workin right again! I don't have a pic in my sig, but it may suck for the guys that do. I had the same problem, and I can't change my sig either, whats up with that ????
Rick Schmidt Posted December 24, 2009 Posted December 24, 2009 Guys, hold on a second. Before we start rippin the board apart about this lets wait til we hear from the big dog himself. All kinda hoopin an hollerin over something that could just be a glitch at the moment. It happens things mess up. No sense gettin mad about a rumor
charlie8575 Posted December 24, 2009 Posted December 24, 2009 Could THAT have been why I couldn't get on about 7/7:30 A.M., on Monday??? I couldn't get in no matter what I did, then "Poof" it started workin right again! I don't have a pic in my sig, but it may suck for the guys that do. I had an insomnia bout Tuesday night/Wednesday morning and encountered similar occurrences, with nothing loading. Although there was discussion of this, I thought sizes were going to be limited, not altogether verboten. Whatever the problem, I'm sure we'll have an answer sooner rather than later; even if one we didn't really want. Charlie Larkin
Kombi Posted December 24, 2009 Posted December 24, 2009 If I could offer a different perspective to the limitations of signatures, and no, I don't care one way or the other as I'm connected via fiber. I frequent a fair number of forums on several topics. Of those that I actually register and participate on, and whenever possible, I disable signatures and avatars. It's nothing personal, but I'm here for the content and exchange of ideas. I've also seen it where some users have a tendency to create huge signature images that are often longer than their typical, one-line posts. That and I find the images are terribly distracting to the overall thread. Furthermore I believe, but I have no actual evidence to support this, that curtailing such signatures may help to save on bandwidth charges. Which would really stack up quickly over an entire site. In which case I couldn't fault a site owner for taking that route. That said, I seriously hope there won't be 3-image limit on a single post. That can be very frustrating.
Jeff Sauber Posted December 24, 2009 Posted December 24, 2009 If I could offer a different perspective to the limitations of signatures, and no, I don't care one way or the other as I'm connected via fiber. I frequent a fair number of forums on several topics. Of those that I actually register and participate on, and whenever possible, I disable signatures and avatars. It's nothing personal, but I'm here for the content and exchange of ideas. I've also seen it where some users have a tendency to create huge signature images that are often longer than their typical, one-line posts. That and I find the images are terribly distracting to the overall thread. Furthermore I believe, but I have no actual evidence to support this, that curtailing such signatures may help to save on bandwidth charges. Which would really stack up quickly over an entire site. In which case I couldn't fault a site owner for taking that route. That said, I seriously hope there won't be 3-image limit on a single post. That can be very frustrating. Yeah, I'm more concerened about a 3 pic per post limit, rather than whatever happens to silly sig pictures. Quite frankly, I don't really come to this place to entertain myself by looking at people's sig pics, but I do tend to post lots of modeling images in my threads and having a limit on them will be a much bigger annoyance, than some kid's obnoxious sig picture. I don't really care if sig pics have been terminated, I've never really used one, and some of those folks who have, have seriously over-indulged themselves.
Nick Winter Posted December 24, 2009 Posted December 24, 2009 Yeah I noticed this too, I went to update my builds and everytime even when I removed stuff it said my signature to freakin' long. so i'm stuck with this ###### signature which isn't fully up to date.
Modelmartin Posted December 24, 2009 Posted December 24, 2009 Yeah, I'm more concerened about a 3 pic per post limit, rather than whatever happens to silly sig pictures. Quite frankly, I don't really come to this place to entertain myself by looking at people's sig pics, but I do tend to post lots of modeling images in my threads and having a limit on them will be a much bigger annoyance, than some kid's obnoxious sig picture. I don't really care if sig pics have been terminated, I've never really used one, and some of those folks who have, have seriously over-indulged themselves. If you can get your pics hosted somewhere then you can load up as many as you want and not increase this sites bandwidth. I use Fotki and it works great and it's easy to link up. I hear you on the sig pics. I think some are pretty over the top... or is it...under the bottom! About 1 out of 100 "quotes" in the sig lines are actually amusing or illuminating. Some are quite ignorant and a few are offensive. I don't understand the purpose of them.
Jeff Sauber Posted December 24, 2009 Posted December 24, 2009 If you can get your pics hosted somewhere then you can load up as many as you want and not increase this sites bandwidth. I use Fotki and it works great and it's easy to link up. I hear you on the sig pics. I think some are pretty over the top... or is it...under the bottom! About 1 out of 100 "quotes" in the sig lines are actually amusing or illuminating. Some are quite ignorant and a few are offensive. I don't understand the purpose of them. I'm currently using photobucket to host all of my images, and I think you can have 10 pics per post here, [at least thats the way it was the last time I posted pics here, a couple weeks ago]. I'm just about done with my 48 lincoln, so I'll see if the pic count limit has changed in next couple of days when I post the completed car. I really hope the forum doesn't reduce the pic limit to three per post......then we'll be just like that "other forum"......oh yay!!
Jon Cole Posted December 24, 2009 Posted December 24, 2009 What is this? "Merry Selfishness"? What I'm reading, essentially, is so much "I like posting pics in my thread, so THAT'S OK; but I don't care about sig line pics or text, so too bad for you!" Or, vice versa. What a pathetic selfish attitude! Sorry, but the world doesn't revolve around any one person here. I would think the right and decent thing to do, is to think of what's BEST FOR ALL.
Eshaver Posted December 24, 2009 Posted December 24, 2009 HUMMMM, I Know NUTHINK................................ Ed Shaver !
Karmodeler2 Posted December 25, 2009 Posted December 25, 2009 < What a pathetic selfish attitude! <img src="http://www.modelcarsmag.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/angry.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid="" border="0" alt="angry.gif" /> Sorry, but the world doesn't revolve around any one person here. I would think the right and decent thing to do, is to think of what's BEST FOR ALL.</b> Hey Spyder, (did you mom really name you "Spyder"?), I have to agree with you. It seems that when those claiming to be tolerant have their tolerant views stepped on, they quickly become intolerant. David
Modelmartin Posted December 25, 2009 Posted December 25, 2009 Hey David, In your sig line don't you mean that four out of three people are dyslexic?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now