Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted

The question is pretty simple - I'm not asking about 289/302s, 1/24 302s or anything else quasi-related. While I realize the difference in deck height would be negligible in scale, I'd still like to know the answer.

Posted

In additon to what has previously been mentioned, he Revell '32 Fords come with a 5.0 (302) which could be made to work- as you said, the deck height/width issues would be negligable in 1:25.

Posted

ANY 289/302 block can pass as a 351 Windsor if you want it too. Like Chuck said, measuring them wouldn't be noticable. From the OUTSIDE, they're virtually identical.

Posted (edited)

I just dug out a Revell 302, and an AMT 351 ('93 F-150), and they're very close in size. The '92=95 F-150 kits would be the easiest to source- they all come with an AOD, but if you wanted a passenger-car automatic transmission or a manual, you could graft one on pretty easily. The Revell '94-up Mustangs all have modern five-speed manuals, the AMT '67 Shelby has a nice four-speed (If I recall correctly, it even has a separate bellhousing and shift linkage), and the Revell street rod kits have a late model EOD auto.

I've used the F-150 351 block in the past with the manual trans from a '94 Mustang and everything matched up pretty well with minimal file work. (Only reason I did the 'cut and paste' was because I somehow managed to mess up the block on the Mustang casting, but still wanted to use the 5-speed.)

Edited by Chuck Most
Posted

In additon to what has previously been mentioned, he Revell '32 Fords come with a 5.0 (302) which could be made to work- as you said, the deck height/width issues would be negligable in 1:25.

I dont quite agree with that. The 289/302 are a little to narrow as it is in most kits, I dont think they would pass very well as the wider 351

Posted

I dont quite agree with that. The 289/302 are a little to narrow as it is in most kits, I dont think they would pass very well as the wider 351

I'll agree with Shane. The intake manifold is noticeably wider on the 351 and therefore the best visual indicator.

Posted

I'll agree with Shane. The intake manifold is noticeably wider on the 351 and therefore the best visual indicator.

Ya got that right Steve !!!!!!!!!!!! Ed Shaver

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...