Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

Daddyfink

Members
  • Posts

    5,612
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Daddyfink

  1. 12 hours ago, Dave Darby said:

    Jim Keeler was and is a kit designer. He's why those earlier Revell ultra detailed kits are fiddly, due to their scale fidelity. Some of his earliest designs were the Attempt 1 and the 56 Ford pickup.

    I know who he is, I know what he did. Why does everyone feel like giving history lessons on this guy. So Ford and Mickey Thompson didn't design those cars? Keeler did? 

  2. 57 minutes ago, stavanzer said:

    The Late Bob Paeth told me that he and Mr. Keeler worked on several kits together. I don't remember which ones. But, Mr. Keeler was most certainly involved with some well known 1960's Revell Kits.

    Oh, absolutely, Keeler was a big part of the early days of the hobby and lots of credit is due to him, and yes, he was quite instrumental in the design process, but I would not really call him a designer, but that is just me. I voiced it out loud and apparently met some resistance. 

    And that is all I have to say about that. 

  3. 26 minutes ago, Greg Myers said:

    I believe Ed Keeler might be driving some of this, him being the original designer 

    How is Keeler the designer? All the parts are pre made items. By that, I mean, Pontiac Engine, Chassis Research Chassis, etc..

    He came up with ideas to kit, the rest is just parts someone else designed. Atlantis moving stuff around would alone make it their design. Right?

     

     

  4. 3 hours ago, Ace-Garageguy said:

     

    Only thing I can't get on board with is "they should do it for us".

    OK...like why? How big is the market, really, for an AWB Olds convertible?

    Well, seeing how well the Chevelle Funny Car did, I don't think there will be a lack of want for the Olds. 

    There are lots of us who have a few missing pieces in the collections, and having the ability to fill it with a kit we can save and build, is pretty appealing. 

    • Like 2
  5. 2 hours ago, garagepunk66 said:

    The whole body is off in multiple respects. 

    #1. The real car had much lower rear wheel arches, not radiused up high into the quarter panel like the kit's

    #2. The top chop is wrong in the kit. The real car didn't have the a-pillars leaned back like the kit. The roof itself on the real car was lengthened to accommodate the chop. The kit's roof also seems to be raked downward at the front. The real car appears to have a dead-level chop.

    #3. The real car had headlamps. The kit's are blanked off. 

    And that's just kind of a start. It's too bad MPC didn't put more effort into making accurate replicas with some of their race car kits 

     

    image.png.454f66742645ec6588a521fb4c50eed6.png

    image.png.33e8f0944fcc82276260616d716282e3.png

    • Like 2
  6. 1 hour ago, magicmustang said:

    MPC should use the body from their Jolly Roger Maverick funny car. It's the same body from the MultiMaverick kit without the long hood scoop. 

    Jolly Roger JC.jpg

    so it begs the question, do they still have it? It is basically the Ohio kit, but with the better nose. Making a proper opening using this nose would be tons easier. 

     

  7. From fellow Model Club member Bruce Snyder. He stopped at Pegasus on his way to GNRS.

    "First I stopped at Pegasus hobbies and picked up a few models and talked to Larry the owner of Pegasus and Moebius models.
    Asked about the in the works Chevy ramp truck…….he is remeasuring the cab as the current specs are not totally as accurate as he wants…..
    This ram-truck will probably not be out until late in the year.
     
    The Maverick is about ready to be produced…..different issues will be coming hopefully in 5-6 months.
     
    The AWB and street versions of the 65 Dodge are about to be started in the mold process and expected to be produced late this year…
     
    Got a picture of this Ford tow truck on the shelf……coming soon"
     
     
    image.png.41f4a88b4a28c58fe93af75a554b4690.png
    • Like 9
    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...