ChrisBcritter

Let's see: of the kits shown, I've had the AMT '29 roadster (channeled on '32 rails; dismantled long ago but still have the body); the Revell '30 sedan (way too fiddly for me to get the body together when I was 12); the Monogram '30 Phaeton twice (still have a stock early built-up); the AMT '28 sedan and '29 woody/pickup (as yet unbuilt), and three Hubleys (sedan when I was 11 - finished it! - and unbuilt phaeton and Victoria that I'll probably end up building because no one else wants them...). Really liked the Monogram kit best for building. Has anyone built the '29 woody or '28 sedan and had any issues with them?

Another shining beauty, Tulio! Wish AMT would open the hood on this one (they could use the chassis, engine and underhood stuff from the '63). Have you ever thought of doing up a Willys Aero resin kit to look like the early Brazilian version?

Just beautiful, Steven! What kit were the tires from?

I suppose the Camry will eventually catch up with those Corolla numbers. Are they counting the New Beetle as well? That's like lumping the Model A figures in with the Model T just because they looked similar.

(cough - cough - cough) Just needs a scratch-n-sniff card that smells like burning rubber.

I really can't see why AMT hasn't taken a crack at a '27 T roadster and coupe, unless they figured their '25 T was close enough. Considering the successful variations they came up with for their '32 and '39/'40 Fords, you'd think it would have happened by now. As to why the Mantaray and so many iconic '60s customs weren't kitted - I'm guessing it was the luck of the draw, considering how many customs were kitted back then. Maybe that complex Maserati chassis was the deciding factor? If it had been the Mantaray instead of the Silhouette, we'd probably be asking for the Silhouette today.

Made a quick visit to the Libertyville, IL Hobby Lobby yesterday just to check the stock. The sale items were mixed in with the regular models this time, instead of being on a separate display. Quick notes: AMT BH Cop Nova and MPC Connie Kalitta Bounty Hunter Mustang both $14.99 ea. 50 Olds $15.59 Monogram '53 Vette and AMT Double Model T both $13.79 ea. Revell 41 Willys P/U, AMT '62 Vette and '69 Hurst/Olds all $14.39 ea. Monogram GTX, Buick GSX, '99 Mustang and '64 1/2 Mustang all $11.99 ea.

VERY lucky to find a hardtop in any condition, let alone that nice. Only two louver pieces used and no fender skirts! Is the rear bumper intact? I don't see the driver's side taillight. By the way, the Buick's roof/glass were same as the '58 Cadillac - if you found a junk Buick body you could convert the reissue Jo-Han Fleetwood to a Coupe de Ville.

Sounds like they used the mold for the '65 promo glass by mistake - wonder if the rest of its molds might be around? Definitely good news if you have a promo with bad glass. Edit: Except for the lack of front tabs. Never mind.

Gary, I did some work on this one; anyone else wish to chime in?

+1 on the hinges! Hope you can come up with something workable - lots of wagon kits out there would benefit from an opening tailgate.

I have one (and used to own a real one) as well, which I posted here about a year ago: http://www.modelcarsmag.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=61385&p=976713 The Revell Imperial is rather fiddly to build, especially the areas behind the headlights which I ended up scratchbuilding, but it captures the lines of the car very well. Fit on the glass is approximate at best. And Charlie, I agree about the '62 Chrysler - it's not as crisply molded as the Jo-Han 300 but it's the only game in town if you want a low-line Newport (plus its wheelcovers are much more accurate).

Belated thanks to all for the info!

I've seen that stuff at Michael's, and I've wondered about using it to cast headlight/taillight lenses from a mold. Does it dry hard enough to use for that?

Good Lord, someone sank some money into this (you don't want to know how much that recast steering wheel cost, let alone the chrome). Unless the grille was changed, this is actually a '47 or '48.

Ron - I'm sorry but I haven't found that roof rack. I thought for sure it was in the '61's box but it wasn't.

Thanks for posting all this info, Tony - I've been wondering how far off the AMT Ford chassis was; looks doable. I do have the chrome ribbed quarter panel pieces from my '61 I'm not using; wonder if you can make them work? And Ron - I'm sorry but I haven't found that roof rack. I thought for sure it was in the '61's box but it wasn't.

Looks like the Bicentennial threw up on it! At least it's still around and is supposed to get restored.

Tough part is finding one with a working radio; I've had two that did: a light blue '67 Mustang (sold it long ago) and an ivory '68 T-bird. Nice models and I don't mind that they're cheaper (but not by much) than regular promos.

I can't believe this. I didn't watch the ending because I figured the listing would get pulled way before then - I don't think we've heard the last of this story.

That's the big "if"! And IF the dimensions are off and I have to modify it, it'll be nearly impossible to match the grain. Anybody have those measurements?

Just bring some bug spray for those hornests!

Boy, that red sure is bright! Interesting to see the wagon roof removable for a change. (Ron - If you still have the stock parts you didn't use, please PM me.)

So how did they do, and where are the "after" pictures?

Does anyone have a Revell/Monogram '59 Chevy convertible raised top they could measure? Thinking of using one for an AMT '59 Pontiac convertible but I'd need to know the width across the header and at the bottom of the C-pillars, and the overall length. Thanks!