
Mark
Members-
Posts
7,269 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Gallery
Everything posted by Mark
-
Themes, Tributes, and other conspirancies
Mark replied to STYRENE-SURFER's topic in General Automotive Talk (Trucks and Cars)
Sure, it's been done. One guy I know does a fair amount of that: building Palmer kits to look like the box art illustrations (the markings on those cars take a bunch of work!), and building some of the more unusual drag versions of AMT and MPC kits (example: the drag version '70 Impala with the injected engine, full stock interior, and no roll bar). He's about halfway to a complete collection of MPC 1971 kits built with the "spoof" parts too. The only thing slowing that down is that he starts with poorly built kits because he doesn't want to use anything in "too good" condition for those. I told him he should build a drag strip diorama with all of those offbeat drag cars; so far he has passed on the idea. I've seen a few "what if" Tom Daniel cars over the years too. -
Hitler's Ride - Ancient G4 out of box review
Mark replied to Faust's topic in Car Kit News & Reviews
Hitler owned as many Mercedes as Elvis owned Cadillacs... -
I remember seeing stacks of those in the mid/late Seventies at one of the local department stores, a buck apiece. I don't think many of them moved even then...
-
I don't think the prototype Classic Six (Type C) still exists, but rather one of the production models. No others have turned up, so the one in the GM collection is likely the only one that still exists. The production number commonly thrown around is (IIRC) 2,999, but that number has been disputed. Chevrolet probably didn't build that many of them. The first thing I ever bid on, on eBay (at my brother's house; I didn't have a computer yet) was a disassembled promotional model. This was in 1998 or 1999...got it for the opening bid, around ten bucks. Those were the days...
-
Jo-Han 66 Olds Toronado question...
Mark replied to PowerPlant's topic in General Automotive Talk (Trucks and Cars)
eBay glossary entry: "Seller cannot guarantee it is 100% complete" = "something is definitely missing" -
Anyone have a review of the AMT '64 Impala 'Super Shaker'?
Mark replied to pharoah's topic in Car Kit News & Reviews
The Hilborn injector manifold in the Round 2 reissue '64 kit is from the '63 annual kits. One is included in the '63 convertible kit I have, and I'm pretty certain it was in the hardtop also. Not in the '64 kit are four pairs of very short, plated injector tubes that go with the manifold. Those are in the Prestige series '63 hardtop, and subsequent reissues of same. They're on the plated tree, on the side with the custom parts. The second-issue Super Street '64 (with the Woodward Avenue box art copied from a GTO ad) included all of the clear parts from the annual kits, including the light transfer bar pieces. The battery box was not included. Engraved headlamp detail was added to the grille, though in the kits I have seen the detail is "clocked", or not aligned correctly. This was corrected with the Street Rods series and subsequent issues. I used to think that there were two separate '63 hardtop tools; one for the kits and another for the promo/Craftsman kit. They are probably one and the same. The slide for the hood area would be different for the two versions (kit with separate hood, promo with molded-in hood). The engine, firewall, and some other parts probably got moved over to the '64 kits back in the day. When the simplified engine was later added to the Craftsman version of the '63, they probably altered the body tooling and tooled a new hood instead of looking for the original slide (which may not have existed by then). That would seem to be the most logical explanation... -
All of the snap Javelin/AMX kits were '74s. Those were done in the mid/late Seventies after the last updates of the glue kit which used many of the same parts. I won't say all of them were the same, but every one of those snap kits I have seen was molded in dark green, and had Hurst mag wheels.
-
Every issue (except that "Woodie") can be built stock.
-
Anyone have a review of the AMT '64 Impala 'Super Shaker'?
Mark replied to pharoah's topic in Car Kit News & Reviews
I'd have to check, but I'm pretty certain the Hilborn intake was an option in the '63 Impala kits. -
All of the Toronado and front-drive Eldorado kits include Oldsmobile engines. '65-up Cadillac V8 engines had the distributor at the front, among other differences. Jo-Han never tooled a decent late Cadillac mill (nor did anyone else, for that matter). The Oldsmobile engine's valve covers had no lettering or script.
-
The bowtie caps aren't correct for the Impala...they were used on the Camaro, Nova, and Chevelle though.
-
The 60s must have been some WILD times they were
Mark replied to gtx6970's topic in General Automotive Talk (Trucks and Cars)
For those who are interested, the "Batmobile" and trailer are back on eBay... -
The 60s must have been some WILD times they were
Mark replied to gtx6970's topic in General Automotive Talk (Trucks and Cars)
Model Car Science ran a two or three part article on building a 1/25 scale Batmobile back in the day. I haven't got the issues (don't collect MCS) but if I remember right, the builder started with a '65 or '66 fullsize GM car kit, and advised readers to use one too. I think he stated that it really didn't matter which one you used as a starting point (Olds, Buick, or Pontiac) because so much of it was going to be reworked anyway. The conversion involved a lot of cutting, sheet plastic, and putty, but the finished model looked pretty decent. Some kid probably saw one of those articles, grabbed the closest thing that was available, and got to it. And probably had a lot of fun doing it. -
Two cars...the stock roadster, and the (yellow) Mod Rod. Not all of the Ala Kart parts would be in there, as some (like the fenders) were altered for the black Street Rod issue in the early Seventies.
-
Parts Identification Help Wanted, Part II
Mark replied to Casey's topic in Model Building Questions and Answers
-
AMT Double Dragster Engine Option
Mark replied to Lunajammer's topic in Model Building Questions and Answers
The Round 2 MPC Cosmic Charger dragster includes a newly-tooled Potvin blower drive setup; that one should work, and taking those parts out of that kit won't leave it unbuildable. This won't be of any help unless you could track down the parts...AMT did include a similar setup for the Chrysler display engine in their '61-'62 Buick Special wagons. The same display engine and trailer were then used in the '63 Nova wagon. The Nova wagon was later butchered into the Boss Nova (using the Chrysler engine to power the car). Unfortunately the Potvin setup wasn't included in the Boss Nova because in that kit, the engine is right behind the driver, and that setup wouldn't fit. So you'd be looking for fifty-year-old parts. It wouldn't be tough to scratchbuild/kitbash a convincing setup anyway. -
Are NASCAR kits falling out of favor?
Mark replied to Jon Haigwood's topic in General Automotive Talk (Trucks and Cars)
AMT and Revell/Monogram both overproduced on the kits, in addition to that there was a proliferation of diecasts alongside those. Then the bottom dropped out. There are exceptions, but once they went to the downsized cars in the early Eighties, you don't see a lot of nostalgia builds on these (certainly not as many as pre-1980 cars). I know a guy who was getting sealed Nineties kits for $1 apiece up until a couple of years ago. He'd resell them for $2-$3 apiece at a local flea market. I myself decided to pick up a couple of the early Monogram kits a couple of years ago. I got one of the first four kits (the red Buick Regal), sealed box, for something like $3 (not from the guy referenced above). That said, if you are into the subject matter, that's good for you because you can stock up for cheap. If you don't care for NASCAR but do kitbash and build street machines, the chassis parts can come in handy. The truck kits have a slightly longer wheelbase; those chassis can be fitted to earlier bodies instead of stretching the car chassis (not that that's tough to do). The engines in most of the kits I have seen are pretty decent, too. -
The '70 Bonneville was an MPC kit originally; AMT was a competing company back then. The only time the boat and the Bonneville were sold together was the Model King issue.
-
The first AMT Vanishing Point issue (a few years ago) had the twin-scoop hood, the correct style wheels for the VP car (don't remember what they were called), and a front bumper with no molded-in guards. I'd imagine those parts will be in the new issue also.
-
Last week, I got a call from my mom's care facility telling me they had sent a registered letter, containing a form I needed to sign and return. That letter was in the mail already when they called. We went over the information on the form, and I disputed some of it. So they had to send another registered letter with a corrected form. I got a little green postcard in Monday's mail, and went to the post office on Tuesday and signed for the second (corrected) form. The first (incorrect) form, sent at least a couple of days before the second one, arrived today.
-
I guess writing a letter is out, because they won't deliver it...
-
HELP, Trying to indentify some old hubcaps
Mark replied to gtx6970's topic in Model Building Questions and Answers
A: '55 Chevy B: '59 Ford (including T-Bird) C: '53-'55 Corvette D: '65 Chevelle wagon or El Camino (hardtop kit was an SS, centers differ slightly) E: '61 Ford F: '61 T-Bird G: '61 Falcon/Ranchero H: '66 Imperial (not 100% sure on this one) -
Pontiac version of the Chevette (T-1000?)
Mark replied to fomocomav's topic in Model Building Questions and Answers
The '79 was the last promo/kit. The 1:1 '80 had revised quarter panels, hatch, and taillights. GM probably didn't want to spend the money to update the promo, and MPC probably wasn't selling enough kits to justify the expense...so no '80 Chevette kit. -
The R&R credo: "you're a modeler, you can fix it!"