Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

chaparral2d

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Previous Fields

  • Are You Human?
    yes
  • Scale I Build
    1/24

Profile Information

  • Full Name
    David Earl Dembeck

chaparral2d's Achievements

MCM Member

MCM Member (2/6)

  1. chaparral2d
    Lovely! It's nice to see something other than numbers 1 and 2.
  2. chaparral2d
    Nice build of the old IMC kit. This is one of the best builds of this venerable, old kit that I have ever seen.
  3. chaparral2d
    I'm a Chaparral fanatic, and you nailed it!
  4. chaparral2d
    Marvelous build! I tried this one in the late '60's and it ended up in the trash. After seeing this, I will try again.
  5. chaparral2d
    Nice presentation and build. I will come back to this post when I get around to mine.
  6. chaparral2d
    Beautifully done!!!
  7. chaparral2d
    I have this kit in my building queue. I will use your post during my construction.
  8. chaparral2d
    You, sir, are a craftsman!
  9. chaparral2d
    Nicely done! I wish that someone would re-release AMT's kits at a reasonable price.
  10. chaparral2d
    Nicely done! The program continued into 1969 with the P69. A roadster version. It was even more unreliable than the P68.
  11. chaparral2d
    Very nice model!
  12. chaparral2d
    The MkII's that ran at Daytona in '66 did not have the brake scoops on the rear deck. Otherwise, Nice build.
  13. chaparral2d
    chaparral2d joined the community
  14. chaparral2d
    As far as the MkIV goes, the IMC kit more accurately represents one prepared by Hollmann and Moody. Main differences are the plexiglass cover over the two four-barrels and the side windows in the cockpit. H&M cars featured access windows that were hinged; Shelby cars had access windows that slid forward. The IMC kit needs a great deal of work in the engine bay. It would be best to kit-bash the IMC and MPC to come up with an accurate engine bay.
×
×
  • Create New...