mikos

Any chance of unaltering (no pun intended) the rear wheel wells back to stock location so we could get a stock ‘65 Chevelle Malibu SS out of it?

If that’s the case, go on that auction site and just buy some Johan Mavericks. At least you won’t have to wait a year for them. Time is money as they say. ?

Wow, that’s a big difference in width. Was the Monogram ‘59 Caddy smaller than 1/25th scale?

If they did a modern ambulance based off the heavy duty F550 truck cab and chassis, they could do a stock F-Series Super Duty truck based off it. They would just have to tool up a stock bed. That would give them a two for one deal.

I think the Squad 51 truck from “Emergency” would sell enough to justify the tooling cost. If you say no, then I will have to point out the new 1/25th scale Green Hornet “Black Beauty” that Round2 just released. I don’t think it’s a simple scaled up 1/32 PL kit, but I could be wrong.

Ice cold. I think those two were last available in ‘67 and ‘68 so I don’t think so. They would have to clone them.

Nice build! However, that flat saggy upper window line and the elongated front wheel well shape really bothers me.

Doesn’t the PL version come with a correct rear bumper?

Okay, thanks. I visit the store and see what I can find out.

Okay, so now that the “$200k+ tooling cost” reason has been blown out of the water once and for all courtesy Steve G., what are now the other reasons some of those old Johan kits or their subject matter can not ever be done again as cloned reissues? Just licensing rights now?

I’m sure the Coronet R/T with trailer was a big seller. If they clone it, they need to clone an original annual/promo. Reissues and resin copies are fine, but the closer they can clone it after the most original issue release, the better it is IMO.

Nothing like that at my local HL. Must be a regional thing.

Time for Round2 to do a clone on this one.

No more 40% off coupons so no Hobby Lobby for me.

No pics of the body?

It’s about time we finally got a stock ambulance out of the Ghostbusters kit. We had to wait almost 35 years for it to happen, but we finally got one.

Nice! I like the new color too.

It was, but that was the era of slide rulers even on the real thing. It wasn’t a car that was around for almost 35 years with tons of information and pics about it. Unfortunately, we model kit buyers got stung by the China gap syndrome.

Maybe Round2 will do this for us with a cloned reissue.

Where are you getting $200k+ for each cloned kit to be produced? I don’t think it’s costing Round2 $200k+ per model kit tooling for the cloned kits that they have done. I think you’re talking about brand new tools like the Revell ‘71 Mustang. Since kit sale totals are a fraction of what they used to be compared to the old days, according to many sources, there’s no way they would be able recoup that kind of investment if all those cloned kit reissues were state of art new tools. I believe Round2 has only released two brand new model kits this year, the new Ford Bronco and the 1/25th scale Black Beauty from the old Green Hornet T.V. series. However, their cloned kit reissues usually come out several at a time, not 1 or 2 per year, like it is with a brand new tool. This tells me that the cloned reissues, although more expensive than a straight reissue, are significantly cheaper than making a brand new tool of a subject. I’m pretty sure it cost Revell a lot more money to produce their ‘71 Mustang kit than it was for Round2 to reissue their cloned ‘63 Nova wagon. I don’t think I’m overstating the nostalgia factor about those old Johan kits. I think there is still a lot of that around. However, if we continue to wait…5….10….maybe….20 more years, then yes it will eventually erode away as new customers in the hobby will not have had the experience that we did in buying and building those old Johan kits. Scanning and cloning a kit/promo that is already done cuts down on the development costs and the time it takes to get it out to market like Steve G. said. So, even though we’re stuck with a more primitive kit than what a modern tool would give us, it costs less. That means less kits have be sold to recoup the initial investment cost. With the way the market is these days, that is probably the best strategy to use at this time. The more cloned kits that you can sell, the more money there is to spend on brand new tools that may come in the future. It’s a win/win for them and for us. When I compare the Johan kits to what they’re selling for on that auction site, it’s not really the prices they are commanding so much as the popularity of them. The subject matter seems to be very popular these days which leads me to conclude that a cloned Cadillac, Oldmobile, or American Motors model kit would sell well. It just has to be the right model from those respective makes. A lot people around here got worked up over an esoteric PU from the 50’s. Imagine the buzz if they announced a ‘68 Olds 442 reissue, ‘70 AMX reissue or a ‘65 Cadillac reissue. I think the place would burn down.

Okey has the rights to the name and I believe there is enough of a nostalgia factor in that name to sell it to Round2. Cloning some of those old (Johan) kits under the Johan name would be the best way to do it IMO. Of course, you can probably do it without, I suppose. However, you would lose a big part of the nostalgia aspect like how the MPC/AMT brand name is utilized by Round2.

What nonsense? I, like a lot of others would love to see some of those Johan kits produced again. It’s rather obvious to me that no one is going to make a modern tool kit of a ‘65 Cadillac Coupe Deville, or ‘66 Olds Toronado. So, why not use cloning technology to copy what was already done and reissue them again. It would be less expensive and the business case would be more favorable due to the lower costs involved in a project like that. Also, I think what you and Justin fail to realize is that there is a lot of built up nostalgia associated with these types of kits. A lot of people would buy one just for the fact they remember buying/building one as a kid. The Boomer and X gen market. A new modern tool wouldn’t have that and it would significantly be more expensive to tool up a modern kit like that compared to cloning an already existing example. Round2 is proving it can be done and it can be done within budget constraints and licensing requirements.

That’s your opinion. What you think SHOULD hold true is not what is actually selling by the truck loads. Apparently, Round2 is having a lot of success with these recent cloned up kit reissues so there is a market for them, a big market. These short cuts, as you call them, allow consumers to have access to kits that were thought long ago missing, destroyed or simply just too expensive to buy and build on the collector market. Except for their limited detail, the bodies were typically dead nuts accurate due to the promo tooling most of them were based upon. If that means we can get a lot more kits of this vintage than just 1 or 2 new tools every year, I am all for it. It’s very clear to me that it’s less expensive to clone an old kit than it is to tool up a brand one with modern detail.

Thanks Niteowl! That explains a lot. In the Gone in 60 Seconds example, wouldn’t Revell have to pay an additional licensing fee to the H.B. Halicki estate (or whom ever owns the rights to the movie) to do a version of the movie car?

SuperFly was converted into the Sweathogs “Dream Machine”. They opened up the roof. I’d rather not see that one come back, but if they fixed it back to stock version, heck yeah!