Ace-Garageguy

That's kinda what I was getting at about learning new skills.....like modifying illustrations and photographs into 3-view drawings, and then on to printable formats. It's a jell of a lot easier to manipulate an image in a computer (no sculptural ability and tool-using eye-hand coordination necessary) than it is to scratchbuild, eh?

Fiddling with the nose and tail. Thinking of doing a floating surround for the grille. The rear panel I'd started to use has moved to the front, and a similar panel, again sort of Pontiac looking, has grown on the rear so both ends will have some design unity. Also moving the windshield back a few scale inches. Mostly dechromed at this point, too.

Getting there........letting the primer shrink in while I work on other parts of the build.

Tony, I REALLY think you shoud go ahead with the Dodge. It's a killer looking truck, and entirely different from what I'm doing with my '38 Ford. Just my opinion, but that Dodge would be really something spectacular.

One thing I've been happy to see is a rekindling of interest in models in the 1:1 hot rod mags, and a good number of younger guys building traditional hot-rods in 1:1. Taking a young person for a ride in something fast and loud and somewhat scary can often open a door to experiencing life in the first person, as opposed to canned virtual "reality". The car model hobby has NEVER excited everyone, but it has the potential to last if WE get kids involved with making REAL things.

Art Anderson: "Amaco X-11 moist pottery clay works beautifully, and cleans up with water." Thank you sir. Great to know.

Yup, exactly what I've been getting at. And instead of investing bazillions making injection-molding tools, let's say Revell invests instead in measuring and converting to digital files extremely accurate images of whatever car is desired. No Chinese outsourcing, either.

Quoting old-hermit: "3-D tech is a boon for the hobby and resin casters already. You can create a file, have it printed, use it for a master, cast it and sell copies. The sales of the castings can offset any up front costs." Indeed, but with the price of 3D printing continuing to fall and the resolution increasing, it won't be long before "casting" in resin just isn't necessary. Models could be printed to order....again, no tooling cost is the attraction here. There is already a company making a D-Jag and an Aston Martin in 1/24 this way, and the costs are in line with what you'd pay for a traditional cast-resin kit. Some large-scale automotive and aircraft engines are also available, printed-to-order. It would eliminate inventory as well...all you need is a drum of goo. No unsold inventory either, when the marketing department screws up. If it just didn't get made, it doesn't have to be disposed of at a loss when it doesn't sell in the predicted numbers. Honestly, if I were Revell and had the kind of lead-times they're facing now, I'd be seriously investigating this tech in order to survive long-term. If you look at the increase in home computing power versus the cost over the past few years, and extrapolate the probable increase in 3D printing power versus cost over the next ten years, say, I think it's quite feasible to think of having a printer on one's hobby bench, and ordering up a print-to-order model on the spot, all for costs comparable to what we pay now for an injection-molded model plus shipping,

62 rebel, that's an excellent point. However, my understanding of copyright law MIGHT make it entirely possible for a modeler to copy an existing design "for his own enjoyment", rather like CDs and DVDs can be exhibited in a home environment, where there isn't any copying with intent to profit. I mean, you can scratchbuild anything, and the copyright police don't come knocking.

I posted some of this on another thread, but thinking it might get lost, I decided to open a new topic: Technology MAY bring a new "golden age" for modeling in the near futire. The cost of 3D printing is plummeting as the tech matures, and it's now possible to get a desktop 3D printer for $200 a month or less. At one time, a machine that had that capability was $30,000. Google sketchup is almost free-CAD, and has an extension to convert files created in it to a format that will run 3D printing apps. There is a guy in my local club who is actually making use of this technology and producing some parts that were previously only available if one was a very accomplished scratchbuilder. (Interestingly, he's one of the oldest modelers in the club, but is embracing the new tech like a kid.) What this means for any of us who choose to learn a few new skills is that ANY model can be produced with NO TOOLING WHATSOEVER. If you want a Borgward, go measure one carefully, or find blueprints, draw it up in sketchup, and have it 3D printed in wharever scale you want. Or do your own original design. There are companies that will "print" it from your files, for a reasonable fee. You can do this today, right now. The cost will continue to come down, and while not acessible to modelers of all income levels, a lot of current stuff isn't either. There are a lot of talented designers who are content to work on their creations and build them in a virtual world. BUT, I think there will always be an appeal to have real, 3-dimensional models that can be touched. The available tech allows the best of both approaches to merge into a super-modeling capability. So, who's up for moving the hobby into the 21st century?

I haven't read this entire thread, and someone may have already brought this up. Technology MAY bring a new "golden age" for modeling in the near futire. The cost of 3D printing is plummeting as the tech matures, and it's now possible to get a desktop 3D printer for $200 a month or less. Google sketchup is almost free-CAD, and has an extension to convert files created in it to a format that will run 3D printing apps. There is a guy in my local club who is actually making use of this capability and producing some parts that were previously only available if one was a very accomplished scratchbuilder. What this means for any of us who choose to learn a few new skills is that ANY model can be produced with NO TOOLING WHATSOEVER. If you want a Borgward, go measure one carefully, or find blueprints, draw it up in sketchup, and have it 3D printed in wharever scale you want. You can do this today, right now. The cost will continue to come down, and while not acessible to modelers of all income levels, a lot of current stuff isn't either.

You've got people who can hurt themselves with a wiffle ball, and you've got people at the other end of the spectrum who can juggle running chainsaws, while drunk, and never get a scratch. Unfortunately (IMHO) the lowest-common-denominators seem to eventually be the ones the world gets changed for. Rather than requiring people to actually control their vehicles, we have air bags, back-up monitors, car-following radar, automatic-parking, ad nauseum. I'm sure, frankly, that if my insurance company knew I had probably a gallon or more of toxic, flammable and potentially explosive chemicals in the model shop, they'd cancel me. Those things are just so DANGEROUS !!! Yes, if one is an idiot. By the way, is it currently legal for aliens to invade Tennessee?

Hey TonyN, glad you like it. Actually, I started this build on another forum back in December of 2010. It's at: http://cs.scaleautom...spx?PageIndex=1 There's a little more info about what it takes to make it work over there. I started it up here because I've got it back in the rotation again, having finally figured out how to do some things better, liike getting the right roof curvature, etc. Do you have a build thread here for yours?

Anybody have an idea what the holdup is on the '57 Ford? I saw test shots well over a year ago that looked great.

That's another real beauty Bernard. You're getting the T-bucket thing in high gear. Gretat photos too, as always.

Hi Carl. I know you and your work from over there too. Nice to see you in this group as well.

This was built from that kit. It's pretty basic, not a lot of parts, but they're nice parts.

So do you mean I shouldn't wash my car parts in gasoline in front of the fireplace in the winter? It's always been so cozy and warm.

I'm seeing a LOT of pickups posted in Under Glass and also WIPs in Workbench. They don't seem to be getting moved. What's the deal? Are they supposed to go in the truck section, like it says, or is it okay to post them with the cars? I'm asking because I've got several custom hot-rod trucks I'd like to post, and I just want to follow the rules. Seems like they get more views in with the cars. Thanks.

Hey, thanks for posting that. I've never had one of these kits, but I surely have some of the parts from one, and thanks to seeing the pix on ebay, now I know what they are !! IMHO it's worth the money. The Bantam coupe body, tube frame, front axle, headers, diff and fuel-injection manifold would make the basis for a nice model.

Thanks for all the interest guys. There's going to be so much work in this one, I'm definitely going to make resin copies, or at least conversion cab parts using the '37 frame and the 1/24 '36 Ford as donors. Probably do two versions, one with open doors and one without.

I know some of you guys use PrepSol to clean resin parts, but personally, I'm afraid of it. Why? A lot of resin parts are porous, and the stuff can soak into the pores of the resin and play jell with adhesion down the line. I painted the leading edges of the wings on a Cirrus SR22 a few years back, and used PrepSol as a final cleaner before the color coat. The PrepSol penetrated the primer, and the paint came off in sheets first time it was flown in rain. I've used 91% isopropyl alcohol for my final cleaning (and ALL of my cleaning other than the first wipe of a painted surface prior to sanding) since then, and haven't had any more problems. Granted, you probably won't drive any models 180mph in a rain storm. I'm just sayin'..........

Wow, that's a great idea to get kids involved in doing something actually hands-on. You must also have the patience of a saint. A large part of my career has been built on skills and knowledge I began learning while building models as a kid......something my parents thought was a total and complete waste of time, by the way. You're doing a good thing.

Yes, but in the US, he's better known for his relationship with Ferrari and other Italian makes, partially because his Cisitalia was featured by the NYC Museum of Modern Art in 1972. We haven't had a lot of Peugeots over here, but many US car guys know the Ferrari 275, the Dino 246, the Alfa Spyder Duetto, the Fiat 124 Spyder, the Ferrari Daytona, Testarossa, Ferraris 308 and 328, 355, 360, 550 Barchetta and the F40 and Enzo.....not to mention some spectacular show cars like the the Mythos and the Maserati Birdcage 75th. The company's work reads like a who's who of vehicle design.

Thanks. I'd really like to do some COE wreckers and a chopped Divco.