Ace-Garageguy Posted September 17, 2019 Posted September 17, 2019 (edited) 58 minutes ago, GaryR said: ...Did you guys not see the "1968" right on the photo? Yup. And the photo has that washed out old color print film look. And I thought I'd seen it before, but didn't recall the story...which makes perfect sense now. Thanks for setting everybody straight. Edited September 17, 2019 by Ace-Garageguy
Sledsel Posted September 24, 2019 Posted September 24, 2019 On 9/14/2019 at 4:17 PM, Scott8950 said: That's a disgrace to that Challenger
Scott8950 Posted September 24, 2019 Posted September 24, 2019 10 hours ago, Sledsel said: That's a disgrace to that Challenger yep i totally agree
djflyer Posted October 6, 2019 Posted October 6, 2019 (edited) Then you have this: Edited October 6, 2019 by djflyer
Matt Bacon Posted October 6, 2019 Posted October 6, 2019 1 hour ago, djflyer said: Then you have this: Now why would you do that? It’s like trading a Stradivarius for a Stratocaster... best, M.
Cpt Tuttle Posted October 8, 2019 Posted October 8, 2019 On 9/14/2019 at 5:11 AM, Greg Myers said: Years ago a member of our model club (Moon Light Modelers, Phoenix AZ ) continually talked about the HEMI he was going to put in his '71 Challenger. This was way before the new generation. One meeting he showed up with his car running the HEMI he spoke of for so many months. Jaws dropped when he opened the Hood and eyes saw the big ol 392 iron block HEMI nestled in the engine bay. Needless to say we were speechless. There is a lowrider Duster in Sweden that has a 392 hemi..... ? I always thought that it was an odd choice of powerplant.....
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now