carl63_99 Posted March 28, 2023 Posted March 28, 2023 Salt is based on a 1976 Hurst/Olds Proposal car that Hurst did, never went to production. Pepper is a rendition of the 1977 Cutlass that I owned. Pros) Excellent 3D printed kits. No other way to get this subject, accurate body proportions and details. Cons) Plastic can be on the brittle side. Have to buy other kits to get all the parts to finish them. LOTS of sanding to get the 3D printer mold lines off. Challenges) Window glass, steep learning curve working on making window glass that fits and looks good. I used the interior from a 1969 HO for Salt, so the interior was more musclecar. It has more gauges as well as more bucket to the bucket seats. Done to represent a 455/4 speed. The interior on Pepper is from a 1975 Promo car, with a few small changes to update. Done to represent the 350/350 auto that I drove many years ago. I highly recommend doing 3D printed kits. They can be challenging, but very rewarding. Builders need to take their time with them. LOTS of fine sanding to get every aspect of the rendering smooth. I could have spent a lot more time on these, but I'm still happy with what I have. 6
Dragonhawk1066 Posted March 28, 2023 Posted March 28, 2023 These body styles are sorely lacking from the model manufacturers!
Sledsel Posted March 29, 2023 Posted March 29, 2023 Both look awesome! So many '70s cars need to be kitted.
AMT68 Posted April 1, 2023 Posted April 1, 2023 Nice work on both models. As a fan of the Colonnades I've always had a particular liking for the very handsome '76-'77 Cutlass Supreme coupes. Nice to finally see one as a scale model.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now