Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted

Nice job on that. The Jo-Han one looks much better than any of AMT's efforts, but I see they still got the plugs in the wrong place on the passenger side. The covers are not symmetrical on the 1:1

valve_covers_1.jpg

The spark plug location is my biggest beef with the AMT CAMMERS. On some it has the front plug on the left side going directly into the timing chain.
  • 11 months later...
Posted

Good reference pic of a Cammer. I like that this one is clean without any excess anything, and the blower belt tensioning pulley and bracket always seem to be left off of scale models...so no more excuse now! :D

Posted

I have been using my marginal skills to convert the old Johan Maverick covers to a more correct appearance. Driver's side is pretty much done:

290a0076.jpg

Johan part on top, modified part below.

I have the other side to do - I have to move the plug locations to the proper offset...

Posted

boy, you guys are going thru a lot of trouble for a valve cover....... and i like it!! never did know about the covers not being symectrical, now every time i look at them, i will know they are wrong. was always satified with them, till now. thanks for the info.

btw - i think there is a 69 torino kit that has a nascar version of this motor.

Posted

If you can find it the Polar Lights Gas Rhonda Mustang funny car has a good set of valve covers for the cammer. As a bonus you also get a 426 hemi motor in that kit too.

If you want a good valve cover and are not concerned with the Ford engraving try the "street freak" Mustang and Pinto's. They look good on street rods.

  • 10 months later...
Posted (edited)

The AMT '68 Shelby kit has the optional parts to do this engine. If it matters, Ford never installed it in any production vehicle.

Edited by Monty
Posted

Thanks Monty. I know about the engine being a "race only" item. I'm planning on building a 1963 Galaxie lightweight, as soon as I finish the 64 427 that's almost completed.

Posted (edited)

IIIRC,

AMT '66 Galaxie;

AMT "Silhouette" show car (often overlooked);

AMT '33 Willys

I'm sure some of the other guys will have more suggestions for you.

Mike

Edited by ToyLvr
Posted

That's the Great V-8s supplement but I can't find a date, just the pull-out. The SOHC they recommend is from the AMT 68 Shelby GT 500. It has twin 4 BBL carbs on a ram induction manifold.

Dale

Posted

This has been covered before: http://www.modelcarsmag.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=52024

For a 427 Cammer I'd go with Ross Gibson's resin engine. The Blue Oval scripts on the cam cover in mine is very faint, but you can always scribe it out to represent the early version with straight ribs.

For kit based Cammer, the AMT one is off. The one from Johan looks nice, but will need work on the spark plug locations.

Posted

I'm sorry but,the Silhouette doesn't have a 427 SOHC motor.

It's definitely a 427, but maybe not an S.O.H.C. As I indicated in my post, I was going from memory.

See the comments from one of the forum's "elder statesmen", Ed Shaver, about the Silhouette and its engine:

http://www.modelcarsmag.com/forums/?showtopic=17377

Anyway, sounds like there are some much, much better options. :-)

Posted

I don't think the recent Round2 release of the '68 Shelby has the SOHC parts in it. You would have to find one of the older Ertl/AMT kits (shouldn't be a problem; there are a lot out there

Posted

Revell makes/made a 'Parts Pak' (accessories) 427 c.i. with two four barrels or blower. Also, the '66 Fairlane AMT kit has a 427c.i. I think it's the S.O.H.C. version.

Posted

The AMT 66 Fairlane GT-GTA ia a wedge head. Mine, at least. The Parts Pak 427 is a wedge, too. I have several. To correctly ID an OHC engine, look at it from the front and not the valve covers. The front of each head will have a cam shaft end plate.

Dale

Posted

Yea, I have a Parts Pak, 427, that I will most likely put into the T Bolt kit, I stole the 427 from, to build my 64 Galaxie. I really would like to do a 63 with the SOHC engine, and a lightweight interior from MCW. Thanks for all the replies everyone....

Posted

It's definitely a 427, but maybe not an S.O.H.C. As I indicated in my post, I was going from memory.

See the comments from one of the forum's "elder statesmen", Ed Shaver, about the Silhouette and its engine:

http://www.modelcarsmag.com/forums/?showtopic=17377

Anyway, sounds like there are some much, much better options. :-)

I think Ed was wrong wnen he said AMT put the Ford motor in the Silhouette.

Bill Cushenberry put the Ford motor in the Silhouette when it was included in the Ford Custom Car Caravan.

Check out www.cartechbooks.com

  • 5 years later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...