Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

didnt know what to expect when i read the topic title ..

but this looks awsome , those wheels look so good :)

something fresh imo , really liking this

what kit is this ??

Edited by crazyrichard
Posted

Is this the final colour scheme?, I hope so it looks great.

yup i had to search for the antique white in the craft aisle and for an acrylic its impressive how easy it is to work with.
Posted

didnt know what to expect when i read the topic title ..

but this looks awsome , those wheels look so good :)

something fresh imo , really liking this

what kit is this ??

revell-1930-ford-model-a-touring-street-

I call it the mee too model a just about everyone i know has one or had one, lol. I had about 3 of these mostly bought them for wheels, I got this from a friend who did the same.

Posted

Colors = nice.

Rolling stock = (with all due respect) ugh.

Just not my cup of tea, but to each his own. That's what makes the world go 'round.

B)

Posted

I like it a lot myself. What are the wheel centers from? They look like Turbines (not sure that's the correct name) from the DOH kit. Great idea on them, whatever they are.

Later-

Posted

I like it a lot myself. What are the wheel centers from? They look like Turbines (not sure that's the correct name) from the DOH kit. Great idea on them, whatever they are.

Later-

56 chevy street machine

Posted (edited)

looks good, just don't go with the Japanese 'VIP' Style angled wheels. (put them on straight instead).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VIP_style

It's also called HellaFlush (Narrow tires stretched on wide rims, wheels tucked under the fenders and lots of camber):

http://www.stancenation.com/2012/06/09/hellaflush-kansai-japan-photo-coverage-part-2/

It should look different with this body style.

Edited by dmk
Posted

well love the paint and wheels , very fresh .. the omni camber .. hmm doesnt do it for me on a model a at first i thought it was just a rough dry fit :) well for me i would say some camber would be nice but this extreme ... but that said (was just my taste speaking) just do it , because we dont need to push people in boxes and well if we all did the same it would be boring .. just have fun i'd say :)

Posted

so i'm sitting here wondering how that works from a purely mechanical point of view.... the front axle would be fairly easy to modify to accomplish that stance, but the rear.....

Posted

so i'm sitting here wondering how that works from a purely mechanical point of view.... the front axle would be fairly easy to modify to accomplish that stance, but the rear.....

they use special plates if i'm correct

Posted (edited)

Mechanically speaking the rear would need to either have IRS=independent rear suspension or if a FWD with tube axle rear then there would be plates to move the hub with negative camber. A live axle rear should not have negative camber. I'm sure our buddy here has some trick up his sleeve for the rear....

Edited by LAone

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...