Danno

Good job.

Nice.

Sehr cool modell. Gut gemacht!

Excellent! Welcome aboard the board!

Excellent.

Very happy you have a wonderful outcome to report, Jeff. The Lovely and Gracious Mrs. B had a similar but slightly less severe event not long ago but is recovering very well. Hers occurred in the doctor's office during a follow-up visit. Had we not been there . . . God has his plans. Thank Him. I do.

Wow!

Okay, gather around, all ye manufacturer-critics! If you complain about the delays by Moebius with their Ford pickups, you better climb on your soapboxes . . . this Johan '69/'70 Fury kit is 45 years late!!!!!

Decent. But it REALLY needs to get dirty!

Kewl Deuce!

Yer always welcome!

I have too many miles on the ole odometer to be considered 'cute' any more, Carl, but I am smart. I use all words correctly, large or small. I'm sorry if "large" words offend you. By the way . . . it is "too" hard, not "to" hard. Even the small words will trip you up if you don't use them correctly. Sorry if this is too long.

Just wanting to rebuttal? That makes no sense. Rebuttal is a noun. One can't noun. One can rebut. That's a transitive verb. To rebut is "to prove (something) is false by using arguments or evidence." I guess you could say I was rebutting your judgmental but unsupported assessment of other peoples' mental health by questioning your academic qualifications to diagnose in rather sweeping terms based solely upon short, isolated phrases posted on a model car forum. But, no, you certainly didn't offend me by your post or what it demonstrated. No, I'm not trying to poke a response out of you. (First of all, you're not the type I like to poke.) I was merely trying to illustrate the fallacy of your overarching and ill-informed diatribe. The post you poked about may have been inappropriate, but your response was, too. Two wrongs don't make the second one right. You obviously totally missed the point of my post. In other words, stick to what you really know, think before you post, and don't jump sharks. And, PS: Before you lather yourself up some more, be advised: I have nothing against you and I'm not trying to provoke you. Go forth and be cool.

But it all sounds so emotionally unstable.

Being fueled by emotion is not evidence of instability. Rash statements are not evidence of instability. Many people would consider your blanket statement to be 'rash.' Does that mean you are necessarily unstable emotionally?

Thank you! That's what we strive to do. Glad we're achieving the goal. The DSC11 is going to be better than ever!! Looking forward to seeing you there.

How do you copyright a resin part?

"Emotional instability?" Which medical school did you attend, Doctor T?

Nice. Those classic lines lend themselves well to all kinds of treatments.

Nice.

Nice concept, Mark. You're right on track with the basic Chuck Granger Style ~ 60's to very early 70's at the latest. He wasn't big on street rods with modern, chromey mags and definitely was NOT a fan of billet wheels. His favorite default was probably painted steelies with brand-specific dog dish caps, although he was into Cragars and Halibrands. Forward, m'man! You've got the spirit. Chuck would approve.

Well, that's an interesting approach. But one thing occurs to me. That kind of heavy scale rust would only occur if the vehicle was submerged for a long time, in which case the sides and all surfaces under water would be equally heavily scaled/scaly. So it seems to me, anyway.