I will say that I am now satisfied with how the Moebius Hudson looks. This weekend, I subjected it to the "Ed Test".
A bit of background is in order- Ed has a very good eye for a car's lines, even though he really doesn't know much about the car itself. Know a guy who thinks Olds 4-4-2s had 442 ci engines? Or one who thinks all Ford 429s are of the Boss variety? Or insist GTO stands for 'Grand Touring Option?' Yep- Ed's one of those guys. But, he can correctly ID just about any vehicle built before 1980 or so. He's not a modeler, but he has noticed the flaws and proportion problems on quite a few kits of mine he's seen. He noticed the crooked, faint body crease on the AMT/Ertl '67 Comet before I did- sure, to a modeler such a flaw might be obvious, but remember, Ed is a non-modeler, he isn't 'trained' to look at a model car kit in the same context as we would. Ed did take note of the close-but-no-cigar shape of the window openings, but overall was fairly pleased with what he saw.
There you have it- the "Ed Test". Not very scientific, but works for me!
Then again, should I really trust a guy who who insists a 2010 Impala is rear drive?