fury3

Thank you for the information, Brett. I do know and speak with Don and Carol on a frequent basis. Don utilizes me as one of his Chrysler Corporation Technical Advisor's due to my past with the Corporation. In Carol's own words "The X-Rays show it may only need to be set and put in a cast. We are continuing business. Things will slow down, but I've been in the shop each day and am doing some shipping today. Just takes longer than usual-moving around with crutches rather than walking to get what I need. I really don't think customers have delayed placing orders (and hope that they don't start to!) We got more web orders yesterday than usual. Carol, The Modelhaus." Sounds as though Carol's possibility thinking/attitude will prevail here and everyone can continue to place orders and receive them in their normal 6 weeks from receiving the order. They also have their son working with them....I'm sure he's (and Don) stepping up to assist her. Fury3

All I can say is...this post and reinforcement of these rules is way overdue. Especially the "attitude". I have been a member here for over three years and used to reply and post new topics, especially assisting others with technical questions/inquiries concerning "old" Chrysler Corporation vehicles, due to my background with the Corporation. I've been "lurking" here for the last year or so and not participating. Why? Because of the frequent immature attitudes, language, threats, "Evil" juvenile behavior, and the again all too familiar "I'm taking my marbles and going home" posts . Was much of this all for attention? Who knows. I used to come here to enjoy the model car hobby with fellow enthusiasts, and that's all. (Isn't that the main purpose of this forum and magazine?) Not to play head games, watch temper tantrums, or talk about popcorn, etc. I had gotten so disenchanted up with the behavior on this forum by a select few, that last night I submitted my resignation to Harry...and even HE replied that the "juvenile delinquency factor" had gotten way out of hand. In replying last evening to my request, he mentioned that to resign, I must contact Greg. (Notice that I was resigning in the quite unannounced, mature way without topic posting or fanfare.) This morning, after logging on to contact Greg and seeing this topic...it's just what the doctor ordered. I hope these rules are enforced and monitored on a frequent basis by the administration. Maybe now we can get back to enjoying our hobby through this forum, and assisting and enjoying each other with our projects. In other words, using common sense, respecting each other, and keeping the topics about "Building better model cars". Fury3

I must agree with you. beautiful build! However, it's not a Coronet Super "Bee". It appears to be a 1970 Charger R/T....hence the large C-Pillars, simulated door scoops, pit stop fuel filler cap, and character lines. Or, am I loosing it? Fury3

For the 1971 model year, the Javelin was redesigned and it was this year that the AMX no longer carried it's exclusive shorted wheelbase and lack of a rear seat. It simply became a performance/trim model within the Javelin series, sharing it's wheelbase and rear seat. To me, I appreciate ALL Javelin's and AMX's from 1968-1974.....unfortuneatly, it's still a very under appreciated vehicle and deserves better, although it does have it's very loyal (if a bit small in numbers) following. Fury3 Administration, Please delete this reply. It was unknowingly written at exactly the same time that the above reply was written by "Mr Obsessive". Therfore, my reply is not needed and is simply taking up valueable space. Fury3

Interesting build, and I wasn't aware of anyone doing a this car in a resin body outside of "Model Car World" (aka MCW). He (Dave Dodge) offers the 1964 Savoy 2-Door Sedan, and the 1964 Fury/Sport Fury 2-Door Hardtop. Not only do you have the year incorrect in your topic title, but the model series is incorrect as well. Your build is of a mid-trim level BELVEDERE 2-Door Sedan (hence the body side moldings). The 1964 Savoy had no side moldings or trim at all (you can view one of these that I built for MCW in his website gallery.) So, you might want to edit your topic's title altogether, as there were no 1965 Savoy's built in the United States....they became the new intermediate sized 1965 Belvedere I for 1965. Again, I enjoyed viewing your build! Well done. Fury3

After reading all of the replies so far, I suppose I'm really "out of it". I'm a pianist...as a hobby. But after reading the music being discussed here, my music is about as popular and appreciated as a piece of s%#! in the punch bowl. George Gershwin, Serge Prokofieff, Scott Joplin, Shostakovitch, etc. I'll bet most of the younger members have never heard of these people, and don't care if they ever do, LOL! I know....snooze...... Fury3

Hmmm....It seems that when I posted this and the above reply, I was required to "log on" to this forum. Doesn't that indicate that I'm a member here, (although I restrict my limited replies/topics to model car related subjects, hence my low posting count) meaning that as stated above I'm a "content" member of BOTH forums...or is this your way of giving me a subtle hint? If I had "thought I had all the answers" , I sure wouldn't be disabled and fighting our government for 5 years, as well as assisting members of BOTH forums with Chrysler Corporation technical inquiries. Fury3

I must agree with Bob on this one. What is unfortunate is that many members of BOTH modeling forums actually enjoy this kind of behavior. Some actually thrive on it, it seems. An example: One very active/administrative member HERE very seldom posts in "the other" forum....UNLESS there is some sort of controversial topic/subject where he can state his "I'm right, the world is wrong" opinions (at least that's the way they seem to some across at times. ). Art, by posting this here, I feel you are actually "feeding" these types of members....they eat it up! Being a member of both forums I urge you to take 30 days to consider what has transpired at "the other forum" and then re-evalute your feelings/position. Your knowledge and opinions are valued at both of these forums by me and hundreds of others. Both of these forum's have their negative aspects as well as their positive one's. That's why I belong to both. I participate more in the "other forum" because I prefer their strict policies concerning topics that refer only to "Building better model cars". Does that make them better, or me right in preferring that? No, it's simply my preference, and I'm thankful to have the opportunity to belong to both. We must remember as adults that we are dealing with plastic model cars....it's a hobby and suppose to be enjoyable. There are far more situations and problems in the world today to "get one's shorts in a knot" over then this type of thing. Believe me...I'm disabled and am fighting our government and it's inability to deal with "the color gray" on a regular basis. Let's go build something! Fury3

All, yes all American passenger cars where the manufacturer is BASED in the United States! In other words, Chrysler Corporation prior to Daimler's take over, General Motors, and Ford Motor Company. Specific vehicles, my top 10 are: 1. 1968 Plymouth Belvedere/Satellite/Road Runner/GTX 2. 1965 Plymouth Fury's 3. 1968 Dodge Charger and R/T 4. 1957 Chrysler New Yorker & 300-C 5. 1962-64 Ford Fairlane 6. 1968-70 AMC Javelin and AMX 7. 1961-1966 Oldsmobile Starfire 8. 1968 Chrysler, all series 9. 1963-64 Studebaker Avanti 10. 1963-67 Corvette Stingray But who really cares? This list and information sure isn't going to help me or anyone else "build better model cars"! Fury3

I can not post a photo for you but can tell you that the Modelhaus grille is an exact duplicate of the Jo-Han promotional grille with molded in headlamp detail. (I have the Modelhaus grille you are questioning, along with the original Jo-Han kit grille.) There was a major difference between the Jo-Han promotional and kit grilles. The kit used separate clear headlamp lenses, whereas the promotional (aka "curbside") had the headlamp detail molded and plated as integral part of the grille. This Jo-Han grille is much more accurate (especially in depth) than the latter "AMT/Ertl/RC2" 1969 GTX Hardtop or Convertible kit grilles.....and I'm not even including the mis-packaged AMT kits which have the 1968 Belvedere Road Runner grille, LOL! So much for progress, huh? Hope this helps? Fury3

There are a few others. The Lindberg 64 Dodge 330 2-Door Sedan (and all of it's numerous variations) and 53 Ford's, Revell 66 Malibu Wagon-59 & 60 Impala's-69 Torino Talladega, Jo-Han reissued 68 Plymouth Fury I 4-Door Sedan (police car) 64 & 68 Cadillac Deville's, the awful AMT/Ertl/RC2 68 Plymouth/Road Runner, many of the AMT 50's kits....56-57 Ford, 55-57-58 Chevrolet's, 59 El Camino, the AMT 60 Ford Starliner and 66 Fairlane 500 427 Ht. Many of these are easily found and inexpensive, others a little more difficult. These are "off the top of my head". I'm sure there are others. Fury3

I agree Bob, this needs to be pinned. I received a personal message from Dave Dodge regarding this very topic October 28th. He asked that I post this new information on the various forum's to which I belong, which I did. I posted this where I thought I should have (in the "Advertising/Links" section of this website), but it seems few (if anyone) view or frequent that area of the forum. I also sent Gregg a personal e-mail message as well. This is really a lousy way for "CompuServe" to conduct business. Not only does Dave risk loosing thousands of dollars in lost repeat clients, but many uninformed hobbyists that have used "MCW" tend to loose out. Please Gregg, pin this updated website address! Fury3 aka Dave

Today I received an e-mail message from Dave Dodge, owner of Model Car World or "MCW". He is an aftermarket producer of factory automotive finishes (paints) and resin kits. His previous website address has changed due to CompuServe closing the server permanently, effective October 31, 2008. The new URL address is http://www.mcwautomotivefinishes.com. Please make a note of it in your favorites and/or files. Fury3

Great idea, and please allow me to modify it a bit further. One could replicate the 64 Fairlane (non-"500") "Skylight Blue" (Light Blue, non-metallic) 2-Door Sedan that Sgt. Joe Friday (Jack Webb) drove as his personal car in the TV series "Dragnet". (Not to be confused with the 67 Fairlane 500 4Dr Sedan used while on patrol.) All one would need to do is modify the body side moldings and rear body panel trim. This can currently be accomplished by using the "Modelhaus" resin factory stock conversion kit...but no one as yet has tooled the exclusive 1964 hub caps. Fury3

That's great and welcome information, Bob! It's nice to see some positive, uplifting news in this forum, instead of the arguing, negative, evil, and inappropriate things I've seen posted lately this year (The reason I've not participated nearly as much as in previous years.). Your experience and wisdom in the model industry is priceless to many of us. Hope you continue to share this knowledge in your usual respectable and polite manner! Fury3

The 440 cu. in. Hi-Performance engine (by 1974 standards, as it was literally "smogged" to death by the government mandates) was available in 1974 on the Charger S.E. Hardtop. It was also available on the Charger Coupe and Hardtop, but required the optional (at extra cost) "Rallye Package", which this beautiful build has. James, you obviously did your research on this build before starting it. The correct MCW paint color combined with the excellent Keith Marks decals and the 71 kit have truly made a standout presentation! Having been with Chrysler Corporation during the period when these cars were popular, there were many Charger painted in this color scheme....although not too many were ordered with the Rallye option (in any color.) Congratulations! Fury3

Truly a beautiful build! This is another one of those vehicles that when I see one factory stock I think..."So THIS is what they looked like originally." Hate to ask, but would it be possible to see more photos? So glad you stuck with it and shared this with us. Most people think their model is "unique" when they customize/or modify it and so on....and their is nothing wrong with that. However, THIS build is what is unique and very uncommon. Congratulations on creating a fine model, and for daring to be different! Fury3

Extremely well written and researched kit review, Ron. Quite unusual that you wisely incorporated the AMT kit (to include it's history...nice touch!) into the review, while giving factual, un-biased information on both. Even though I have a unbuilt AMT kit, the resin and the "Jimmy Flintstone" body, I still purchased two Revell kits. The information given concerning the modifications necessary to build a authentic factory stock 69 SS is appreciated. I'm sure other members/readers can appreciate your coverage of the non factory stock components of both kits as well. Just when I had thought you had covered everything to perfection, you include an excellent link to the factory sales literature for reference. Bravo! One of the hardest things I run into in researching a factory stock build (non Chrysler, of course) is getting the color scheme correct, as I use "MCW" paint exclusively. Obtaining the correct interior trim color availability is one of the most difficult things to research....that link has covered that problem well. Thanks for a great review....I look forward to more of the same in the future, hopefully! Fury3

So, THIS is what a 1964 Impala Super Sport looked like originally?! These cars are usually lowered, raised, turned on their sides, and heaven knows what else . Congratulations on choosing to build a very unique (factory stock) Super Sport, and one that is very attractive to boot! It used to be that people customized and modified their cars (and model builds) to be distinctive (aka to "express themselves"). Some cars, such as these mid-60's Chevrolet's have actually become more unique if they are NOT modified...or so it seems. Nice work in process presentation too....however, I do wish the photos were a bit crisper. Thanks for sharing! Fury3

Being a Technical Service Training Instructor for the "old Chrysler Corporation" (past tense, now disabled), "Dodge Tech" has the right idea.... have a qualified technician run some basic scanner diagnostics. Excellent advise, and don't forget the basics. Fury3

That is one beautiful and well done Coronet Super Bee! You have gotten all of the minor details just right. Did you notice the incorrect Plymouth emblem on the rear seat back? Great minds think alike. I built an almost identical model to your three years ago...not only in the exact same color scheme and correct steel wheels, but using Dave Dodge's MCW paint. (Only difference I can see is that I did not install traction bars.) You can view it if you like in my photo bucket on page 3 in the model cars section. I didn't add the "Cleaner Air Package" closed crankcase vent hose as you did...but that was 3 years ago. Congradulations.....BTW..."MCW's Factory Finishes (aka paint) really makes the builds more authentic, don't you agree? Fury3

A few years ago I asked the infamous Keith Marks to produce a deck-lid finish panel for the 1968 Plymouth Belvedere GTX. He asked me to forward him some factory photos, (which I did) and we now have a complete 68 GTX decal set listed in his website (including the side Sport Stripes) to use on the AMT/Ertl/RC2 68 Road Runner kit. I am planning to build a 1968 Plymouth Satellite Convertible, and didn't feel like creating the deck-lid finish panel out of strip styrene, like I did on the 68 Satellite Sedan in my photo website. He created two identical decals (similar to his 68 Road Runner trim panel, but without the red paint fill and cartoon bird) for me, and they are "spot on". Don't know if he is creating racing and sponsor decals, but you could always inquire. Fury3

My doctors have actually told me to use "Crazy (Super) Glue" to close open wounds brought on by few of my disabilities. When he told me that 4 years ago, I thought he was joking. He wasn't. Due to other medications I must use on my skin, adhesives bandages are not option as they won't adhere. It works on normal cuts and abrasions as well. If it were not for this glue, I most likely would have lost a dangerous amount of blood in a few scary situations. Highly recommended by a person that must use it frequently. It also works good on resin, LOL! . Fury3

Even though you aren't seeking to duplicate a Street Hemi, in my opinion the Revell 1967 Dodge Coronet R/T, Dodge Charger, and Plymouth Belvedere GTX all have the correct 426 Street Hemi Components, and are more properly detailed than the "AMT'Ertl" engines...to include the cast iron exhaust manifolds. The Revell kits parts are correct and a carryover to the 1968 model year..also to include the correct round plated air filter housing. (The air cleaner in the "AMT/Ertl/RC2" 68 Road Runner is incorrect even for that kit...it is the unit used in 1969 with the fresh air induction "Air Grabber" (Plymouth) or "Ramcharger" (Dodge) hoods. A cold air induction hood was not available on ANY 1968 factory built, street legal Chrysler vehicle.) The three things the Revell 1968 Charger kit is missing (if one wants to install a factory stock Street Hemi) are the standard and required 15" wheels/tires, the front door exterior "Hemi" nameplates, and the "torque boxes" built into the rear sub frame...ahead of the front leaf spring supports. The chassis of the Revell 1967 Coronet/Charger/Belvedere has those reinforcements. Fury3