Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

Ace-Garageguy

Members
  • Posts

    38,043
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ace-Garageguy

  1. Just a note of clarification...it's really kinda OK to loosely refer to any of these things as "traction bars", as they're all "bars" that help increase traction...but only if you know the functional differences. Sloppy terminology usually leads to erroneous assumptions that everything under the same general heading is the same, and works the same way...particularly among people with no first-hand knowledge. Ladder-bars and lift-bars (once again, there are subtle differences in how those two work) are also routinely referred to as "traction bars" by a lot of folks...and again, the physics of operation is largely misunderstood or never even considered.
  2. Prior to about '67, "traction bars" were as I noted above, i.e. Traction Masters brand. https://www.npdlink.com/product/traction-bars-traction-master-style/202903 With the development of slapper-bars to give better ride under normal conditions, the nomenclature "slapper bars" was used to differentiate between the two designs. Later, as is always the case, the definitions got cloudy...and many folks called everything that had a similar function "traction bars" (including ladder bars/lift bars, though they also function differently). But y'all can call 'em cheese doodles for all I care. People will still argue endlessly about what "lakes pipes" are too. https://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/threads/slapper-bars.585811/page-2
  3. No, they're not. They are similar, but different.
  4. "Slapper bars" were developed for street-strip dual-purpose cars because "traction bars", by virtue of their more solid mounting, with bushings at either end, could introduce a lot of ride harshness into a vehicle. Slapper bars only function during hard acceleration, when the rubber snubber at the forward end contacts the spring to limit spring "wrap-up". They can also be easily "tuned" for conditions. The rest of the time, you can't tell they're there...other than an increase in unsprung weight that some sensitive drivers can actually feel. "Traction bars" work differently. They bolt to the spring retainer on the axle like the slappers, but also are pivoted to a solidly mounted bracket at the forward end of the spring. They eliminate any spring-wrap-up, but as I noted, they often also introduce harshness during normal driving.
  5. They're more correctly called "slapper bars" (though nobody much cares about word meanings anymore), and as said above, they don't necessarily touch the spring at the forward end. Actual "traction bars" are a different animal and function somewhat differently.
  6. Exactly, and I'd like to respond in depth to these thoughts, but anything I would say would certainly go way beyond the bounds of oblique references to "politics". As an aside, I do think it's rather ironic how the more enlightened motoring press of the late '60s and '70s tended to bemoan Detroit's styling tendencies embracing "tortured sheet-metal" and useless ornamentation, when today, those are about all that visually differentiate one brand from another.
  7. Looks great. I want some. Damm...it just never stops.
  8. Filling a few more holes in the "cars I've worked on over the years...and actually liked" part of the collection. Tamiya 1300 Beetle, for which a '49 split-window conversion is also on the way: Tamiya Fiat Abarth 695 SS, a semi-factory hot-rod: Gunze Fiat Abarth "Assetto Corsa", the full-tilt-boogie race version of much the same car: And a Fujimi Ferrari 288 GTO...probably the Ferrari I'd choose if I could afford a real Ferrari:
  9. Agreed the Heller and Gunze kits look pretty good. I have every E-type ever kitted, and the "punched in the face " lumps are the coupe and roadster that started as Aurora kits, and got reboxed as Monogram and Revell...but they share absolutely nothing with the Revell kit I posted above. Pity they're so awful body-wise, as the early box art is lovely, and the reason I squandered my hard-earned ducats on them when I got back in the hobby. Revell boxing of the hideous Aurora Jag coupe below:
  10. Not as far as I know.
  11. Hmmmmmmm...seems to be getting better on Chrome. Maybe they've been having server issues, heavy traffic redirected, etc.
  12. Ray...look into this guy too. https://www.ebay.com/usr/3dscaleparts I haven't bought any 1/12 parts from him, but everything I've bought in 1/24-25 has been excellent. These, for example, are 1/12: https://www.ebay.com/itm/143984982915
  13. I'm generally disappointed with the kit. Yes, there are some pretty nice things in it, but one big negative to me (aside from the bodged coupe roof profile) is the molded-in cam covers. The ancient Revell kit made them separate, and as they're polished alloy on the real cars, it just makes sense to do them separate if there's going to be any hope in jell of average modelers getting them to look like they really do. The stance is wrong too, as are the proportions of the wheel/tire combo, and it all jumps out at me because I've been looking at real ones since 1963. I'll build it...eventually...but it certainly won't be at the front of the list. It'll take heavy mods to look right to me, so rather than expend gobs of effort to build a righteous stocker, it'll be the basis for a lightweight. And for all the hoopla and bated-breath, I'm kinda disgusted at the mediocrity all the new-fangled "technology" delivered. For my money, this old dinosaur is a better representation of a production E-type.
  14. Like it says. Not an issue in Firefox. Anybody else experiencing this?
  15. Hmmmmm...I might possibly be interested in some. I've got more chassis than bodies at the moment.
  16. THANKS !! I didn't realize they still sold those (of course, I never looked). My father used to bring me odd sizes from time to time, leftovers from developing piping runs in the days way before CAD.
  17. I've had some luck buying cheap, broken diecasts just to get the rolling stock.
  18. Sounds like me 'til I hit about 45. Figured if I wanted to make 50, a few things had to change. 25+ years later, the revised dietary strategy seems to be working well enough.
  19. Thing I hate most about this site is that every time I think I have every car model I could possibly want for the next 100 years, along comes a thread like this that reminds me of another one, and down the rabbit hole I go.
  20. Beautiful little car, unusual combo. Looks very clean and professional. Super nice.
  21. Couple days back I had a fat slice of cherry pie for dinner, then about a third of a pack of generic Oreos for dessert...with milk, naturally. I almost always eat healthy and get lotsa exercise, but once or twice a year I indulge the 5-year-old-me still lurking inside. Keeps him quiet the rest of the time.
  22. He does resin body conversions and kits as well. I have his Corvair rampside pickup, among others. All absolutely first-rate.
×
×
  • Create New...