Ace-Garageguy Posted February 22, 2016 Posted February 22, 2016 Either or, depends on the specific car. I've seen examples of each that I loved at first sight, and many many examples of each I thought were just awful wastes of vintage tin.
oldnslow Posted February 22, 2016 Posted February 22, 2016 Well, technically, they both have fenders, but I really like the channeled cycle fender look.
unclescott58 Posted February 22, 2016 Posted February 22, 2016 I build cars both ways. But in general I prefer fenders.
wayne swayze Posted February 22, 2016 Posted February 22, 2016 I saw a T-shirt once that had written on the front.."REAL HOT RODS DON'T HAVE FENDERS". I mostly agree, but not entirely.
D. Battista Posted February 22, 2016 Posted February 22, 2016 Mostly no fenders...! But if your building it stock fenders of course...!
Roadrunner Posted February 22, 2016 Posted February 22, 2016 Fenders. I've never been a real fan of fender-less old cars.
Harry P. Posted February 23, 2016 Posted February 23, 2016 I think the swoopy fenders of cars from this era are beautiful. So yeah... fenders.
slusher Posted February 23, 2016 Posted February 23, 2016 I think the swoopy fenders of cars from this era are beautiful. So yeah... fenders.Agreed. I like the hotrods with fenders...
ChrisBcritter Posted February 23, 2016 Posted February 23, 2016 Cycle fenders, if that's the kit you have - then buy a reissue and build it full-fendered.
Jantrix Posted February 23, 2016 Posted February 23, 2016 Honestly it all depends on the vision, the inspiration. I love them both ways.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now