Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi, i was wondering if anybody has built this kit and if they could tell me the quality of it?

So far in that fast and furious model iv had the charger and the eclipse, the charger was bad, very bad quality, the eclipse wasn't too bad, the only problem i remember is the body being slightly warped but other then that it was a good kit.

So what should i expect...the doom and gloom quality that the charger had or the good quality that the eclipse had?

Posted

So what should i expect...the doom and gloom quality that the charger had or the good quality that the eclipse had?

If you have ever had an older issue of an MPC/AMT Camaro or Pontiac Trans Am kit, that is what you can expect from the Fast and Furious issue Camaro. If you want to build a nice F&F Yenko Camaro, get the Revell Yenko Camaro kit!

Posted

By the way, if you would like some pics of both the AMT F&F Camaro and Revell Yenko to compare, I have both kits. I (unfortunately) won the F&F Camaro at a show, I would have never spent good money on it!! <_<

Posted

By the way, if you would like some pics of both the AMT F&F Camaro and Revell Yenko to compare, I have both kits. I (unfortunately) won the F&F Camaro at a show, I would have never spent good money on it!! <_<

alright, il forget that project, i was going to get it just because it was cheap but iv never really been a fan of chevrolet or amt/mpc.

Posted

I concur with everyone here. There is precious little about the AMT ersatz F&F Camaro worth commenting on. The Revell kit is the best place to start.

Posted

IIRC the F&F Camaro kit was originally the MPC 69 Camaro, which was modified to a short track car during the 70s then 'modified back' during the musclecar fad of the 80s. Bad job on the body though, front wheel wells too low, sloppy detailing and loose panel fits, poor quality control, even bad plating on some I've seem.

Get the Revell unless you really want to replicate the Camaro as it landed on the boat at the end of the movie!

  • 8 months later...
Posted (edited)

Does anyone have the AMT F&F kit and be willing to take and post a pics of the wheels? The wheels appear to be American Torque Thrust Ds with rounded spokes, instead of the peaked variety. B)

For reference, these are the peaked TTDs which come in the Revell Yenko 427 '69 Camaro kit:

IMG_5411.jpg

Edited by Casey
Posted

Does anyone have the AMT F&F kit and be willing to take and post a pics of the wheels? The wheels appear to be American Torque Thrust Ds with rounded spokes, instead of the peaked variety. B)

I'm not sure Casey, I'll have to check the stash to see if I still have it, but I think I have one that I won at a show. If I do, I'll get the pic for you.

Posted

I'm not sure Casey, I'll have to check the stash to see if I still have it, but I think I have one that I won at a show. If I do, I'll get the pic for you.

That'd be much appreciated, Matthew. B)

Posted

I vaguely recall this one, but from what I remember it was a heaping lump of horse shlock!!!! I got it at Michales many years ago for about $1.10 (sealed) with their 50% off coupon, and so far it's the worst clearence kit purchace i've gotten! (heck, even getting an opened AMT F&F Supra missing wheels and decals for .97 on final markdown was better than this)

Nothing fit, the roof waz crappy looking - looks like someone at the MPC/Ertl drawing board got high on the "good stuff" while designing the roof & grile for this kit... The chassis was a throwaway and everything else was a mess including the decals that ALLWAYS desolve intoa jillion little peices!

DO NOT WASTE YER DOUGH ON THIS KIT IF AN LHS OR ANY VENDOR/RETAILER HAS ONE, EVEN IF THEY CHARGE $30 OR EVEN $2... ITSA PIECE OF HEAP!!!!

Instead, do your self a favor and get the fully accurate, newer tool Revell kit which is plenty avalible and can very very cheap if U look in the right places.

Posted (edited)

Looks kind of stubby in the side view- maybe that's because the wheel arches seem a bit low and that top seems a bit too high...

The '67 kit was way better- goes to show how out of it RC2 was. B)

Edited by Count Chuckula
  • 9 years later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...