MrBuick Posted February 27, 2016 Author Share Posted February 27, 2016 I did fail to research first because I didn't even think about it...I'd never seen a kit molded like this aside from a snap kit, and the other "retro sticker" kits I have must be newer and have separate detail pieces. Unfortunately, this kit was ordered online, so I didn't have a chance to look at the bottom. I've calmed down a lot though...I still don't love it, but it is what it is. The biggest annoyance for me was the shock, and the fact that now the kit isn't going to really lend itself to what my original plan was, but I think I'll just build it box stock and practice honing my painting skills. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Myers Posted February 27, 2016 Share Posted February 27, 2016 I think Colby is correct in that most of us feel the same way. Basically, it's just not up to par and is quite a let down when you are expecting more, and you have plans that just fall short with the parts provided,i.e. the chassis. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
louie Posted February 27, 2016 Share Posted February 27, 2016 I did fail to research first because I didn't even think about it...I'd never seen a kit molded like this aside from a snap kit, and the other "retro sticker" kits I have must be newer and have separate detail pieces. Unfortunately, this kit was ordered online, so I didn't have a chance to look at the bottom. I've calmed down a lot though...I still don't love it, but it is what it is. The biggest annoyance for me was the shock, and the fact that now the kit isn't going to really lend itself to what my original plan was, but I think I'll just build it box stock and practice honing my painting skills.I just wanted to say that I totally understand what you must of felt when you opened the box of the 66 and discovered what it wasn't. Your post above is spoken like a true champion and I'm glad to hear that you are going to keep at it. My painting skills could use some help too (actually a lot of help ). Thanks. Jeff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake45 Posted February 27, 2016 Share Posted February 27, 2016 I'll just build it box stock and practice honing my painting skills.There ya go! Drive on! You'll be glad you did! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Darby Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 I did fail to research first because I didn't even think about it...I'd never seen a kit molded like this aside from a snap kit, and the other "retro sticker" kits I have must be newer and have separate detail pieces. Unfortunately, this kit was ordered online, so I didn't have a chance to look at the bottom. I've calmed down a lot though...I still don't love it, but it is what it is. The biggest annoyance for me was the shock, and the fact that now the kit isn't going to really lend itself to what my original plan was, but I think I'll just build it box stock and practice honing my painting skills. AMT Round2 has a 67 Shelby kit (or you could look up its sister kit, the 67 Mustang, and slide the chassis/engine compartment bits from one of these under to make a full detail model, like you have in mind. it's funny, you know, that back when I was young, a model kit was more of a starting point for something else, not an end point. We NEVER EVER built one straight out of the box. Ever. We kit bashed and tweeked, and made every one unique. When I built a custom, my motto was - if you could tell what I started with, I wasn't finished. I remember back in Jr High Art class, when we were allowed to pick our own project, having to convince my art teacher to let me build a model, because he equated it to putting a puzzle together. And it seems more and more, with today's more detailed kits that aren't as receptive to kit-bashing, that this is the direction we are going. But I digress, Anyway, model kits are like a box of chocolates, so to speak. There will always be some that rise above your expectations, and some that disappoint you. But in the end, it's all about what what you make of what's in that box. I built the Vette you see below from the MPC Streaker Vette when I was 16. Google Streaker Vette if you want to see what I started with. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edsel-Dan Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 I built this kit in the Countdown series.This was the First time I remember it on the shelfI did NOT see the Flower Power kits at allThough Did get 4 of the Desert Race/Rally series3 different kits. 2 of the 59 Buick Invicta hardtop 'Boondock Bomber', the 61 Ranchero 'El Ranchero Grande'& the 62 Galaxie hardtop 'Turista Turismo'The Buick & Ranchero were Curbside, the Galaxie had an engine, but Few custom parts.The Buick was Stock Only, the Ranchero had Custom Parts, but Not the Stylinepieces. I have an Unbuilt of this Mustang from the Resto-Rods series too.Yes, though too young to remember the original, I did build onearound high-school graduation time (1979)And Yes, If I can afford one, would likely get this issue I am Hoping that the 2 Curbside kits Model-King helped get re-issued with Ertl, the 64 Comet & 59 Imperial, get re-issued soonEven though I have an unbuilt (Comet) or started (Imperial) of eachI would buy a few more of them both!!!!!! I am Old enough to know most of the OLD AMT, MPC & even Jo-Han kitsI built MANY of them!Some I still have, some I wish I did!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mk11 Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Not easy, but it is possible to convert a coupe to a fastback... ...or use a coupe to convert the fastback Talk about your stalled projects; I did this surgery about thirty years ago and basically the only movement since was acquiring an interior from missing link mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Ellis Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Yes, the interior is a key part for the fastback. Sometimes you have to find those parts off eBay. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mredjr Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 It is a typical 60's kit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AAFC Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 My big disappointment when I was in my first model building go round in the late 60's were the 2 in 1 or 3 in 1 kits. My choice was always the drag version and when the chassis had the stock exhaust and rear axle molded in-darn! My more experienced friends and the model magazines of the day suggested grinding them down-something far, far beyond my capabilities. The other big one was certain funny cars using the stock bodies with molded in windshield wipers and other stock body features-also darn! I have found it helpful to research the sites with old box art and instructions to check out some of the re-issues out there before considering purchase. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
towtruck Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 AMT Round2 has a 67 Shelby kit (or you could look up its sister kit, the 67 Mustang, and slide the chassis/engine compartment bits from one of these under to make a full detail model, like you have in mind. it's funny, you know, that back when I was young, a model kit was more of a starting point for something else, not an end point. We NEVER EVER built one straight out of the box. Ever. We kit bashed and tweeked, and made every one unique. When I built a custom, my motto was - if you could tell what I started with, I wasn't finished. I remember back in Jr High Art class, when we were allowed to pick our own project, having to convince my art teacher to let me build a model, because he equated it to putting a puzzle together. And it seems more and more, with today's more detailed kits that aren't as receptive to kit-bashing, that this is the direction we are going. But I digress, Anyway, model kits are like a box of chocolates, so to speak. There will always be some that rise above your expectations, and some that disappoint you. But in the end, it's all about what what you make of what's in that box. I built the Vette you see below from the MPC Streaker Vette when I was 16. Google Streaker Vette if you want to see what I started with. nice vette there..looks like Vern inside there to the left. lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake45 Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 Just to show you that a nice model CAN be built from this kit... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
louie Posted March 3, 2016 Share Posted March 3, 2016 Just to show you that a nice model CAN be built from this kit... Exactly, What A Beautiful Piece Of Art. Nice job. Thanks Snake45 for showing us this one. Jeff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BubbaBrown Posted March 3, 2016 Share Posted March 3, 2016 It would really be great if round2 or whom ever it is now would step up and create some new tooling. Yes I'd really love a 1965 2+2 or a 1/25 1965 Shelby. No I'm not interested in stuff that has been re-issued to nausea . I would love to support my LHS but I want new stuff. Thank goodness for Moebius . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Ellis Posted March 3, 2016 Share Posted March 3, 2016 I see you scribed lines for the corner pieces of the body. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake45 Posted March 3, 2016 Share Posted March 3, 2016 I see you scribed lines for the corner pieces of the body.Yup. Little detail that costs nothing, takes only a few minutes, but adds LOADS of realism to the finished model. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Darby Posted March 3, 2016 Share Posted March 3, 2016 It would really be great if round2 or whom ever it is now would step up and create some new tooling. Yes I'd really love a 1965 2+2 or a 1/25 1965 Shelby. No I'm not interested in stuff that has been re-issued to nausea . I would love to support my LHS but I want new stuff. Thank goodness for Moebius .I'm sure that when the budget permits, they will. Give them time, they just bought the company from Learning Curve a while back, and they are a shoe string operation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casey Posted September 7, 2019 Share Posted September 7, 2019 On 2/22/2016 at 3:49 PM, Travis T said: Does this version have the nice Shelby ten spoke wheels? They're the ones that should have been in the 68 Shelby kit. Yes, it does. See below static and video reviews to see what's included: http://www.scalemodelnews.com/2013/03/pony-car-revival-125-scale-amt-1966.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casey Posted September 7, 2019 Share Posted September 7, 2019 (edited) The optional 5-spoke wheels in the original issue always looked too modern to me, but after seeing this vintage AMT pic on the Scale Survivors facebook page, they are entirely age appropriate: Have these same 5-spoke wheel ever appeared in another AMT kit? Were they only included in the original issue of the '66 Hardtop/Convertible kit? Edited September 7, 2019 by Casey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Posted September 7, 2019 Share Posted September 7, 2019 7 minutes ago, Casey said: The optional 5-spoke wheels in the original issue always looked too modern to me, but after seeing this vintage AMT pic on the Scale Survivors facebook page, they are entirely age appropriate: Have these same 5-spoke wheel ever appeared in another AMT kit? Were they only included in the original issue of the '66 Hardtop/Convertible kit? I've got a couple of built AMT Sonny & Cher Mustangs (the '66 annual body was altered into that) and one of those has the same style wheel. I'm trying to piece together two of these cars without having to buy a complete kit (unless I trip over a cheap one). I'm pretty certain the S&C issue had two sets of custom wheels, two sets of grilles, and two each of whatever else differed on the two 1:1 cars. That said, I think the Monogram Badman '55 Chevy has a similar mag wheel, though on the front only. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casey Posted September 7, 2019 Share Posted September 7, 2019 6 minutes ago, Mark said: I've got a couple of built AMT Sonny & Cher Mustangs (the '66 annual body was altered into that) and one of those has the same style wheel. I'm trying to piece together two of these cars without having to buy a complete kit (unless I trip over a cheap one). I'm pretty certain the S&C issue had two sets of custom wheels, two sets of grilles, and two each of whatever else differed on the two 1:1 cars. There they are: Looks like the Sonny & Cher version is where the cross-lace (Appliance?) wheels originated, then later migrated over to the Iron Horse Mustang kit along with some other parts. Looking at the original instruction sheet, the 5-spoke wheels were some model of Rader wheel: 10 minutes ago, Mark said: That said, I think the Monogram Badman '55 Chevy has a similar mag wheel, though on the front only. Yes, you're right, they are probably designed after the same Rader wheel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Posted September 7, 2019 Share Posted September 7, 2019 Thanks for the picture, I should hang on to that. I've got some extra pieces that I fished out of parts boxes, but still there's a long way to go. The Monogram wheel might be coincidence. Daniel usually designed everything on his cars, on some of the show rods even things like rear axles are "styled" and not based on any production car part. The '55 is a more "normal" car though, so it would have more off-the-shelf parts than an all-out show rod would. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Handley Posted September 7, 2019 Share Posted September 7, 2019 Been thinking about buying one of these kits after running across this on Instagram................................ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casey Posted September 7, 2019 Share Posted September 7, 2019 (edited) 23 minutes ago, Mark said: The Monogram wheel might be coincidence. Daniel usually designed everything on his cars, on some of the show rods even things like rear axles are "styled" and not based on any production car part. The '55 is a more "normal" car though, so it would have more off-the-shelf parts than an all-out show rod would. True. I think the Monogram Fire Iron had similar, but narrower, spindle-mount style front wheels, too. I didn't realize the main body of Sonny & Cher version of the '66 Mustang used separate bodyside inserts, but that custom side cove is not an insignificant thing: Edited September 7, 2019 by Casey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casey Posted September 7, 2019 Share Posted September 7, 2019 Here are a few more pics of the Sonny & Cher parts courtesy of a completed eBay listing: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.