Stef

Thank you so much for all this info, @stavanzer, @Raoul Ross. I have a sudden urge to build ALL of these classics. While I don't have the Tempest instructions to add to the above, here is a RoR video, which features the leafspring front suspension:

Wow, you guys are legends! I learn so much from you cats, every single day. Just found this 58 Edsel AWB instruction sheet on Worthpoint. Looks like the Olds Streaker is fait accompli. Well done, gentlemen.

Was thinking the same thing, @larman. From rewatching HPI Guy's Falcon and Nova AWB build videos, they appear to use very similar chassis setups, plastic tires and all. I wonder if that same AWB chassis was used under the original Streaker kit.

Totally agree, @stavanzer; just rescanned HPI Guy's convertible and 442s parts overviews, and seems like between the two of them, most of the Streaker's parts are already covered. Looks like the convertible has the tonneau/chopped windscreen, the 442 has the rear spoiler, and both have the bulged hood for the twin Judsons. I do remember quite awhile back someone mentioned the possibility of bringing the Streaker back to life, and with all the talk about the Moebius 65 Novas and MPC 68 Coronets, I'd totally forgotten.

I do hope it's the Streaker. As much as I want both the convertible and 442 hardtop, this altered wheelbase drag car is the one I really have my heart set on.

That's a nice buildup, @unclescott58, thanks. My skill is good enough these days that I can build just about anything, though as a graphic designer, box art can still be a big influence. For me, the early 80s MPC kit boxes were the best. I love clean box art with bold, bright colours and graphics/logos, no backgrounds, and comprehensive views of what the kit really looks like. As a kid, when I could not afford to buy, I'd stare at the box to be able to visualize it in my head, which made me want it even more. I love big pictures, lots of them, and the box art should be able to sell the kit inside. Looking forward to Round 2's Sod Buster reissue. I love nostalgia. Also very much enjoyed building their recent-ish Mountain Goat, Bad Company, HighJacker, and 78 Pacer, which all featured near-perfect reproductions of classic box art. Awhile back, I started a thread here encouraging Round 2 to reissue older kits with that early 80s MPC aesthetic. New box art, new Harry Bradley-esque decal designs, new colour schemes, with cool new names, and new logos to boot, all done with that early 80s MPC pastiche, but all molded in white this time, and included with pad-printed tires, coloured/tinted glass options, enhanced decals, etc. I'd be happy to play Art Director on such a project.

Awesome topic. Skimming through, doesn't seem as though anyone has mentioned Lindberg's 1948 Lincoln, which came out in the late 90s or early 00s. In the 90s, Lindberg came back from the grave, and despite lackluster box art, created some truly amazing kits. Their box art typically featured a single photograph of a real vehicle, which was repeated on all sides. IIRC, they did not use photos of real models, and did not include any other views. Not of the rear, the engine, chassis, interior, or anything. We just had to go on faith, and judge by the photo, and the subject matter. After an onslaught of amazing all-new kits, Lindberg was riding the crest of the wave, and could do no wrong. They'd earned our trust by making hit after hit after hit. That all changed when they [REDACTED] the bed on the 48 Lincoln. I was looking forward to this thing, picked it up, opened it, and was horrified to discover it was a total piece of BLAH_BLAH_BLAH_BLAH. Turns out, it was an old Pyro. In the past, box art has influenced many of my purchase decisions. Thought not so much these days, as HPI Guy breaks down pretty much everything on the market. If anything, his reviews make me want to buy everything, regardless of the box art.

Ha ha, @blizzy63, right you are! Totally forgot about this one, and yes, yes, yes, this is more like what I have in mind.

This may be the ugliest thing I've ever seen in my life. Me wants, so I can challenge myself to make it look cool. Slam it, stuff the engines inside the coach, trash the entire front section, chop the roof, equip fatter Firestone Drag 500 meats out back, simplify the lines, turn it into a 4-wheeler.

Nice builds, @iBorg and @Classicgas, thank you both. While I never fully appreciated the Deora growing up, it certainly has grown on me.

Thank you for your awesome info, @Mark. I have two gorgeous Hemis from two Revell 32 Ford 5-window coupes, and a sad gluebomb Deora. Time to start hacking.

Hello, @unclescott58, I didn't realize AMT had not created a separate convertible body for that release, thank you. I suppose either regular or convertible versions may have been released in the last couple years and I just missed 'em, though I don't recall HPI Guy or Round 2 featuring Deoras in any of their recentish videos. I do have a gluebomb Deora I plan to build as a dual-Hemi dragster, and would be interested in getting a second kit, thanks!

I remember seeing here ages ago that the Dodge Deora drag convertible kit was coming back out, and realized just now that it never materialized.

Totally vibing on this Bronco, though I'm REALLY looking forward to the ex-MPC 81 Bronco returning, last seen in 2007, IIRC.

This looks pretty neat; loving that grille. Slam it, add a back window, tweak things here and there, and it would be a badass custom.

MPC's Supra was a tour-de-force; perhaps one of their most sophisticated kits ever. I missed it the first time around as a teen, so this time, I'll be sure to snatch up a whole case of 'em. Check out this "What's In The Box" from Madcap Romanian/Monster Hobbies, that he did in April:

Nice additions, @kelson. Never built any of these, but would love to. The only 1/20 in my current collection is MPC's 74 HighJacker, and it would love to play in the dirt with your three amigos.

Loved building Lindberg's Firehawk kit. It came out after their "Formula" kit. The Formula kit actually came with oval-slotted base model wheels, rather than the tri-bladed Trans Am/Formula wheels depicted on the box. The rear hatch glass in both kits looked a bit unweildly sans engraved defroster detail, though overall, I really enjoyed building both. I also enjoyed Lindberg's 1/20 pink snap Blazer. FWIW, I also loved all of Lindberg's 1/25 90s kits, including Crown Vic, Chrysler Atlantic, Colour Me Gone 64 Dodge, Dodge Caravan, 53 Ford, Chrysler Sebring, 67 Olds 442, and 61 Impala. Good times.

Right you are, @niteowl7710, very expensive indeed; I hadn't thought that through. I'm very happy with so much of what Round 2 is putting out, and I'm happy to support their efforts. I'd take a case of 74 Chargers, no matter what chassis they'd throw under 'em. It's good for business, good for normies, and good for hardcore perfectionists who can finally transform their dreams into reality.

Wow, @CapSat 6, that is amazing, thanks so much. Considering Round 2's stellar commitment to improving on the past, wouldn't be surprised if at some point they tool up a new 74 Charger body/interior, and pair 'em up with the 1999-vintage 71 Charger guts.

IIRC, the engine, chassis, firewall, and radiator look an awful lot like my memory of the MPC 74 Super Charger. I haven't held a Super Charger in my hands since about 1986, so maybe my mind is playing tricks on me. Any chance they're the same? Any chance the Super Charger may eventually come back from the grave?

It will probably take a bit of both, crowdsourcing and crowdfunding, to make this happen. Sweat equity, and cold hard cash. Thanks for your perspective, Joe. There's GOTTA be a way to make this stuff work. I'll be the first in line.

Me personally, I would buy every single Johan that comes back out. Growing up, I had a bunch of 'em, including the Comet, Marlin, Starfire, Turbine, Challenger Funny Car, 69 Road Runner, AMX, and 62 and 63 Fury kits. I want 'em all, and more more more. We could seriously start up a crowdsource thing. Get the cash, get the rights, get the tools, get the right people on board. Figure out what is most popular, what is most feasible, what is most lucrative, and take it from there. Whether repairing old tech, and/or building new tech, we can do whatever it takes to get these kits back into the hands of those who most want 'em. Few young people even know about Johan kits. Get a couple on HPIGuy's channel, then every builder on the planet will want 'em, too.

Thank you, @tim boyd, Moebius, and EVERYONE, for your comments, insights, thoughts, ideas, suggestions, comparisons, observations, and GRIT with this kit review. I've never experienced such a detailed and thoughtful community review of an upcoming model kit before. I love it, and look forward to more more more. While I didn't mind the roof before, it's really growing on me. It's very Mad Max, and I can't wait to get one of these, as well as the Falcon in the new Cal Drag Combo, and the upcoming Henry J. I'M IN GASSER HEAVEN.

Hello everyone I'm really stoked to get this kit, and I agree that the roof does indeed look chopped. But I don't care. Though I once did. A lot! Years ago, after building a whole squadron of new and awesome 90s Lindberg kits: - Firebird Firehawk - Color Me Gone 64 Dodge - 67 Olds 442 - 53 Ford Victoria - 61 Impala - I also enjoyed their Caravan, Crown Vic, Atlantic, Sebring convertible, and 1/20 Blazer So then, imagine my glee and excitement to discover that Lindberg was coming out with a 1948 Lincoln! I was so stoked, my skin was vibrating in anticipation. Got my copy, and ripped into it. What the?!?!? I was so angry, furious, and bewildered, I threw a tantrum, smashed it against the wall, stepped all over it, and blasted it into oblivion. I wanted my money back. How DARE they. That was an inflection point for me. Super embarrassing. After that, I started to appreciate kits as they were, learned more about kit history, managed my expectations, and left the things I was OK with, and modified the things I wanted to change/improve. Sometimes, I want a quick, simple 64 Galaxie to build, and sometimes, I want a fiddly Mack R685ST to build. For me, it's now about a blend of quality AND quantity. Sometimes I cut corners to save time. Sometimes I get in deep and spend months paying a high price for a small reward. There are dozens and dozens more kits I want to build before I'm dead, and I'm trying to let go of my perfectionism, and just have fun building. This hobby needs all kinds of builders to make it work. We need the super hardcore rivet counters, and we need the casual guys, too. And everyone inbetween. I've built models I was super proud of, only to discover years later that I'd painted the bell housing the wrong colour. And I hated myself for not knowing that. And I unironically built Revell's infamous 70 AAR Cuda back in 95 when it just came out, and I loved it. Until I realized just how off it was. Hated myself for not seeing that. We should never feel ashamed for building something inaccurate, or feel compelled to change/improve/correct things. We can if we like, and that's cool. If not, that's cool, too. It helps to try to not take things personally. I lurk here every day, and I love love love the stuff you guys are putting out. I seldom contribute cuz you guys know so much more than me, and are far quicker at responding than I am. Today, I felt it was appropriate to chime in. And man oh man, I really want to get me another 48 Lincoln, and build the F out of it. YMMV. Godspeed, good sirs.