Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted

I don't recall seeing a review of this--just looked and I can't find anything. Anyone got pics? I'm interested in the frame mods (particularly front suspension), engine, and wheels/tires. What's in the box, man?

Posted

Snake, I have all 5 of the Revell '57's. I have no way to post pics, but I can give you a rundown of what is inside. Let me get to the kit, and I can share what I see. It'll take me a couple hours.

Alan

Posted

I have not had an opportunity to look inside ,but spoke with some people at the model shop. I was told that there is an optional front suspension system to build a gasser . I would be more inclined to switch the frame from the wagon too the coupe and build it that way if I was wanting to building a gasser.

Posted

I personally don't like this kit at all! Why the wagon, instead of the coupe? The wheel, and tire combo is ridiculous, they look like duplicates of the ones from the '67 Firebird. The fronts look like 13-14", and the rears look like 16-17".....stupid! I know the wheel/tires can be changed, but why? I'm not impressed with the engine options either, C'mon, an injected Y block might have been cool. I'm more into hotrods, vintage drag, and showrods anymore, so to get my money on these kits, it's got to have a "Cool Factor", and this one just doesn't make it.

Posted

I feel just the opposite. 

Big and little tires scream hotrod/cool to me.

I also love that they decided to make the wagon into the gasser. 

Obviously just my opinions. Feel free to make the coupe into a gasser if that is what you want.

Russ

Posted

 

Obviously just my opinions. Feel free to make the coupe into a gasser if that is what you want.

Russ

That's exactly my plan. I'll probably be changing out the wheel and tire package and probably the engine for a 427.

Posted

Snake, I see the others have provided the photo's you sought.

I look forward to building my kit.

I do agree that a Blown Big Block would have made a much better Gasser Motor for this kit, and reusing the pitiful 312 was 'cheaping out'  at it's worst. But better to have the kit, than not. The headers alone are almost worth it, by themselves.

Revell, should sell that tree by itself.

Posted (edited)

I had a look inside this kit .......... not the best gasser I have seen, but with a little work and a big hemi and supercharger should look

Cool!

Edited by Mr mopar
Posted

Snake, I see the others have provided the photo's you sought.

I look forward to building my kit.

I do agree that a Blown Big Block would have made a much better Gasser Motor for this kit, and reusing the pitiful 312 was 'cheaping out'  at it's worst. But better to have the kit, than not. The headers alone are almost worth it, by themselves.

Revell, should sell that tree by itself.

I never figured that Revell would tool another engine for the gasser version, but I was thinking they'd go a bit wilder with the engine setup, like injectors.  I was disappointed that the headers are one-piece units, though they do look pretty good.  The Edelbrock script valve covers are also new, and unlike anything in any other kit with a Y-block.

Too, I'd have thought they would have tooled another hood, even for this kit, which out of the box is more a modern "street freak" interpretation of a gasser than it is a drag car.  The wheels/tires are so-so; the "street freak" gassers often use "piecrust" slicks (they weren't called that back then), sometimes with wide whitewalls.  Mine's going to get all the cliches: Mickey Thompson/Rader wheels and slicks from the Thunderbolt kit, a teardrop blister on the hood, and big Metalflake paint.  It shouldn't be too tough to tie the headers in to the stock dual exhaust system.  By adding some material to the sides of the kit firewall (to fill the space between the firewall and the forward edge of the doors), it looks like a tilt front end might be within reach.

One other thing: there's nothing to tie the gasser front axle to the stock steering box. 

Posted

I'm getting tired of "Gasser" being applied to anything that is jacked up. 

Call it a Street Freak, Custom, Hot Rod but not a Gasser. Unless you make the mods to turn it into a legit Gasser. 

Switch chassis with the Coupe and make that a Gas car and the Wagon a Jr. Stocker or Modified production. 

Posted

No option for 10% engine setback. So it's not even a gasser. Sigh...

!0% engine setback wasn't mandatory, just the maximum allowed to keep the playing field level for engine-swapped cars.

The wheel combo has me somewhat at a loss. If they measure out at 16" in the rear and 14" in the front, they're OK for real-world, correct, appropriate.

If they measure out at 17" in the rear and 13" in the front, they're damm near hopelessly dorky, incorrect, somebody really should have asked me.

Slicks for something like this are commonly available in 15" and 16" wheel diameter fitments. 17 MAY be available, but I've never seen it.

That design of mag was never available in a 13" with a 5-bolt pattern either...to the best of my knowledge. I could be wrong.

Yeah, staggered rubber looks right on a gasser and fronts were typically as small as they could get away with...but it might have been nice to get it right.

Again, there COULD be real-world analogs of what's in the kit...but I've never seen them in the past 50 years.

If I'm wrong, my most humble apologies to Revell. ;)

PS. If you want a blown Ford big-block, this one is cheap and hard to beat.    rmx7254ford_wm.jpg

Posted

Thanks to all for the input and comments on this kit. I am SO glad I started this thread!

Based on what I've seen, I'm pretty sure this is going to be my next HL 40% off purchase. The decal sheet alone could be worth almost that much to me. I have a very special need I'm trying to fill and I think I can do it with this sheet.

I don't have much interest in building a wagon gasser, but I HAVE wanted to build a '56 Ford gasser on the AMT kit for several decades now. This chassis could find its way under that--yeah, I know it's wrong but if it'll fit or can be Snake-whipped to fit, I might do it anyway. Or I might just use the gasser front and rear suspensions on the AMT chassis. Not wild about the Y-block in my '56 Gasser (maybe I'll go early Hemi for that, since I have several sitting around), but I'm also thinking about doing a real low-buck gasser on the AMT '49 Ford and this Y-block might work well for that. And then maybe I'll take the leftovers and do a '57 wagon street cruiser curbside or slammer style.

Again, thanks, everybody! B)

Posted (edited)

 

I don't have much interest in building a wagon gasser, but I HAVE wanted to build a '56 Ford gasser on the AMT kit for several decades now. This chassis could find its way under that--yeah, I know it's wrong but if it'll fit or can be Snake-whipped to fit, I might do it anyway.

I think this subject has been touched on previously, but just in case...there's absolutely NO reason a '57 chassis couldn't have found its way under a '56 to build a gasser way back when. Fabricating mounts to hang the body would be well within the ability of any competent racer-builder, and the mucho strong Ford 9" rear debuted in '57...so it would already be there.

The rules didn't specify the chassis HAD to be from the body mounted on top of it, (which is why George Montgomery was able to build his Mustang on an old Willys frame), only that an "automotive type frame" had to be used.

I'll look forward to seeing what you bash together. :D

PS. The Y-block powered '49 budget car is a great idea too...something that really appeals to my love of fast cars built from junk. 

Edited by Ace-Garageguy
Posted

Or I might just use the gasser front and rear suspensions on the AMT chassis.

If I hadn't just glued the little mounting pads for the front leaf springs to the kit chassis (just before re-reading this thrread), I could have dug out an AMT '56 and done a quick test-fit for you. Just eyeballing things as they sit, however, I think that idea might have merit. 

!0% engine setback wasn't mandatory, just the maximum allowed to keep the playing field level for engine-swapped cars.

I know, it's just that calling it a gasser with the engine in the stock location seems kind of "blah", ya know? :lol:

Posted

I know, it's just that calling it a gasser with the engine in the stock location seems kind of "blah", ya know? :lol:

:D Agreed. The bare minimum methinks ought to have been a blown Y-block sticking through the hood. :D

Posted

PS. The Y-block powered '49 budget car is a great idea too...something that really appeals to my love of fast cars built from junk.

Then you're going to love this POS. Radiused rear wheel wells, with slicks on black opens. Tube front axle. Jacked to heaven, but level, not nose-up. Paint will be Glossy Sea Blue--the paint used on US Navy airplanes 1944-1956--surplus (or "liberated") dontcha know, with a semi-glossy finish. Overall look will be halfway between the old Ramchargers Plymouth gasser (or was that an Altered) and a somewhat decent looking car. It'll be wild. (I don't remember where, when, or how I came to own an AMT '49 Ford kit, and yet here the thing sits.)

Posted

Then you're going to love this POS. Radiused rear wheel wells, with slicks on black opens. Tube front axle. Jacked to heaven, but level, not nose-up. Paint will be Glossy Sea Blue--the paint used on US Navy airplanes 1944-1956--surplus (or "liberated") dontcha know, with a semi-glossy finish. Overall look will be halfway between the old Ramchargers Plymouth gasser (or was that an Altered) and a somewhat decent looking car. It'll be wild. (I don't remember where, when, or how I came to own an AMT '49 Ford kit, and yet here the thing sits.)

Sounds perfect. Love the idea of surplus (liberated ;)) real Navy-blue too.

There wasn't a LOT of speed equipment available for the Y-block (and it had really weird stacked intake ports) but I know for a fact that dual 4-barrel and blower manifolds WERE available. Got to paint that engine the right old Ford red, too.  :D

Image result for y-block dual quad manifold       s-l300.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...