Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted

One of her two sister ships now under construction is also being considered for fitting with an electromagnetic rail-gun that can fire 25 pound projectiles 100 miles at Mach 7 (5000 MPH).

Though 25 pounds may not sound like much, it packs quite a punch traveling that fast.

Some critics think the Navy may have tried to cram too much capability into one platform with this series of ships, and others feel they may prove to be vulnerable due to their very heavy reliance on advanced electronics and computer technology.

                                Image result for zumwalt railgun

 

Posted

and others feel they may prove to be vulnerable due to their very heavy reliance on advanced electronics and computer technology.

                             

At first I felt the same way, but two things I've learned reading about our military is that they are the best in logistics and redundancy.

 

Posted

At first I felt the same way, but two things I've learned reading about our military is that they are the best in logistics and redundancy.

:D Some days they're better than others. 

And sometimes they even do really smart things like keeping the old A-10 "Warthogs" around for another few years.   Image result for still flying warthogs?

Posted

I picked up one of the Dragon Models kits of that ship, still have no idea when or if I might build it or even how, but I had to get one!  Imagine being near an Iceberg field then suddenly this appearing out of it and pointed at you with it's guns at the ready!

Posted

I've never heard any ground troops that did not love the A10.  Why it was even considered for retirement is beyond me.

The Zumwalt Class, amazing the small amount of crew.  Seems like to would just dig into the waves, but for sure its a solid design.

Posted (edited)

I've never heard any ground troops that did not love the A10.  Why it was even considered for retirement is beyond me.

In my view, it's the best close-air-support aircraft in the history of the world, and will be for the foreseeable future.

It's incredibly tough, very well armored AND armed, and relatively simple...which is a very good thing for something operating in an actual combat environment. Every pilot I've ever known who flew it loved it too.

Though it's going to be tough to beat in the role it excels at, it's slated to ultimately be phased out by the controversial and much criticized F-35, another high-cost piece of very-high-tech that many critics also believe tries to do too many things, and ends up not doing any of them particularly well.

Trying to get rid of all of my own old tools and replace them with one Swiss-Army-Knife-style everything-tool would be idiotic...just like thinking the F-35 can function effectively in the role the A-10 pretty well owns.

Think of the Warthog as a .357 magnum revolver, and the F-35 JSF as a scope-equipped .30-06 rifle. They both are exceedingly effective tools, depending on who and where the bad guys are. (This is, of course, assuming that the F-35 lives up to its claimed design potential in actual combat.) But they just aren't very good at doing the other's job.

Edited by Ace-Garageguy
Posted

F-35 taking the place of A-10 smells like politics and tons of cash.

How they suppose an F-35 can fly so slow and fly such tight curves, come back to the enemy for another fly over in such a quick manner is beyond me.  Its ridiculous.

How many A-10's for the cost of one F-35?

The AC 130 gunship is another beast.

Posted

Think of the Warthog as a .357 magnum revolver, and the F-35 JSF as a scope-equipped .30-06 rifle. They both are exceedingly effective tools, depending on who and where the bad guys are. (This is, of course, assuming that the F-35 lives up to its claimed design potential in actual combat.) But they just aren't very good at doing the other's job.

The trouble with that comparison Bill is the fact that the .357 and the .30-06 are old school tried and true cartridges. The F-35 is a brand new, whizz bang, ultra high tech, bird. The A-10 is old school and extremely effective. Kinda like comparing a .357 to a lightsaber

Rumors from Nellis and NAS Fallon is that no one likes flying the thing...........................:blink:

I still carry a revolver off duty, my work rifles have iron sights and my work pistol is older than my daughter.   

Why?

They work. ;)

G

Posted

While it is an amazing piece of military hardware, I would not call it beautiful. It is more of a minimalistic functional design.  Kind of reminds me of the iron-clad ships from the civil war (like the Monitor).

Posted

While it is an amazing piece of military hardware, I would not call it beautiful. It is more of a minimalistic functional design.  Kind of reminds me of the iron-clad ships from the civil war (like the Monitor).

That's funny, I was thinking the same thing only the merrimac

Posted

It does seem a bit like it was inspired by those two ships, yet it also shows a strong "stealth fighter" influence on top of that, as well as a "hides in plain sight" attitude if it's got the right backdrop on top of it.

Posted

It does seem a bit like it was inspired by those two ships, yet it also shows a strong "stealth fighter" influence

Probably because both are shaped in a way which minimizes their radar signature.

Posted

For those of you near Baltimore, it is supposed to be there soon. Zumwalt has left Newport, RI to come to Baltimore where it will be commissioned on Oct 15. I haven't been able to find an arrival date in Baltimore yet. I'm hoping they'll give tours.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...