Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

On this one Greg, can you show us more? Just showing us the rear end of this one does seem to be generating any comments. I mean, it's a nice rear end. But, so? (Or is that "Butt, so?") It looks like a interesting car car in general. Show me more. 

Edited by unclescott58
Posted
3 minutes ago, Jantrix said:

This one has always caught my eye. The inverted suspension must have been difficult to engineer.

Well, not really. And all it actually serves to do is make the car virtually useless in any real-world situation, other than a glass smooth parking lot.

But if the primary reason for building a hot-rod is for "look at me", it succeeds admirably.

Put that backwards ported smallblock Chebby in it, and the different-to-be-different (but doesn't work worth a damm) exercise is complete.

Posted
4 hours ago, Ace-Garageguy said:

Well, not really. And all it actually serves to do is make the car virtually useless in any real-world situation, other than a glass smooth parking lot.

But if the primary reason for building a hot-rod is for "look at me", it succeeds admirably.

Put that backwards ported smallblock Chebby in it, and the different-to-be-different (but doesn't work worth a damm) exercise is complete.

But it has friction shocks! I'm sure they help out a bunch. :lol:

"Look at me" might not be a primary reason for most hot rodders, but it's in the top three. Always has been.

Posted
15 minutes ago, Greg Myers said:

"Underslung" chassis were an early attempt at lowering a car for better handling. 

Agreed, but scraping on the ground, or high-centering on a speed bump, or having the frame rails so low and so far forward as to be the first things to strike anything in the road kinda defeats the purpose. :D

I know...he must be a MODEL car builder in real life.  ;)

Posted (edited)
Posted

Nice! The only problem I have, is I could never get into the car with the top on. I'm sure I'm way too fat! Heck, even without the top, climbing over the side to get in might be tough for an old fat guy like me. But who cares. The car looks great! ?

Posted (edited)

OK Revell, here's your next body for those great Model A chassis. :D

Yeah, I know, it's a Deuce frame, but I'm talkin' to what's in the current (?) Revell  Model A kits. :lol:

img_1318.jpg

img_1320.jpg

Edited by Greg Myers
Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, slusher said:

Sweet, is that a Rambler speedometer?

Sure is - '60-'61 Super and Ambassador used this one. Always thought it odd the way they numbered it - of course if it's a show car, maybe 12 MPH is OK for a top speed? tango_face_grin.png.ee54edea7175016c39b9c36d8da71b77.png

Edited by ChrisBcritter
Posted
10 hours ago, Ace-Garageguy said:

Agreed, but scraping on the ground, or high-centering on a speed bump, or having the frame rails so low and so far forward as to be the first things to strike anything in the road kinda defeats the purpose. :D

I know...he must be a MODEL car builder in real life.  ;)

Well, he may have been, but he's dead now. Don't think he's building much of anything these days. :unsure:

The car was featured in Hot Rod a few years back, and they have the article on their webpage- http://www.hotrod.com/articles/25-dodge-roadster/

I've always had a thing for that car, mostly because it looks like something from an NNL table that somehow came to life. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...