junkyardjeff Posted Friday at 03:06 AM Posted Friday at 03:06 AM Planning on building a mid 50s F600 or larger truck and those had the Lincoln engine and wondering if one was ever made,most likely will just use the Ford Y block but would be nice if a Lincoln engine was made.
sfhess Posted Friday at 06:08 AM Posted Friday at 06:08 AM Didn't one of the AMT Model T kits have a Lincoln engine?
rattle can man Posted Friday at 07:09 AM Posted Friday at 07:09 AM Sort of. The 25 Model T has what is billed as a Lincoln V8, but it isn't very accurate. And it does not have any stock version, only hot rod intakes and headers. According to a few sites I checked, Ford Y blocks ranged from 239 to 312 CI, while the Lincolns were from 279 to 368.
Mark Posted Friday at 12:23 PM Posted Friday at 12:23 PM The Monogram 1/24 scale '56 Thunderbird engine could be reworked into a 1/25 scale Lincoln engine. The two are similar in block shape and port spacing, different in size. You would have to make exhaust manifolds, valve covers, and other parts, and come up with a transmission. 2
MeatMan Posted Friday at 02:21 PM Posted Friday at 02:21 PM (edited) I love it when something new on this forum. I was unaware of the differences in these engines but heard that there were some. Check out this info if you haven't already. https://macsmotorcitygarage.com/fords-forgotten-y-block-the-1952-57-lincoln-v8/ http://www.ford-y-block.com/lincoln-y.htm Edited Friday at 02:24 PM by MeatMan
Ace-Garageguy Posted Friday at 02:34 PM Posted Friday at 02:34 PM (edited) 2 hours ago, Mark said: The Monogram 1/24 scale '56 Thunderbird engine could be reworked into a 1/25 scale Lincoln engine. The two are similar in block shape and port spacing, different in size. You would have to make exhaust manifolds, valve covers, and other parts, and come up with a transmission. ^^^ This is the response you need to take to the bank. There's also a thread on this very board (from years ago) discussing just exactly why the engine in the AMT chopped-T double-kit (and its derivatives) is totally, completely wrong for a Y-block Lincoln and what it takes to correct it. Edited Friday at 02:51 PM by Ace-Garageguy
Mark Posted Friday at 02:40 PM Posted Friday at 02:40 PM It's a shame that the T-bucket kit engine is as far off as it is. Even the valve covers, nice looking as they are, aren't quite right (the ones in the Customizing Boat kit are closer, though a bit small as I remember). As far off as that T-bucket engine is, Aurora cribbed it for their '22 T. They put Corvette valve covers on it, and called it a Chevy engine! 1
Ace-Garageguy Posted Friday at 03:01 PM Posted Friday at 03:01 PM 12 minutes ago, Mark said: It's a shame that the T-bucket kit engine is as far off as it is. Even the valve covers, nice looking as they are, aren't quite right... Yup. I first got involved with a search for a good Lincoln Y-block quite some time back while trying to put together bits for a reasonably close representation of Bill Stroppe's '57 Mercury Mermaid, which used a Hilborn-injected 368 Lincoln engine (bored to 387). https://macsmotorcitygarage.com/a-mermaids-tale-bill-stroppes-wild-57-mercury-roadster/ 1
junkyardjeff Posted Friday at 03:05 PM Author Posted Friday at 03:05 PM I have one of the Lincoln engines from the T kit in my hands and it looks more like a MEL engine then the Y block with the 56/57 Mark style valve covers,the engine from the T kit has a place for a front mounted distributor where the Y block its in the rear like the Ford Y blocks. The MEL resembles the big truck Super Duty engines so I could make it look like one where it was swapped in after the Y block worn out. 1
Ace-Garageguy Posted Friday at 03:22 PM Posted Friday at 03:22 PM 10 minutes ago, junkyardjeff said: I have one of the Lincoln engines from the T kit in my hands and it looks more like a MEL engine... Yup. Sounds like you have a plan...but the Mk II valve covers won't bolt to an MEL head...at least without an elaborate adaptor...so there's that.
Chris V Posted Friday at 03:34 PM Posted Friday at 03:34 PM (edited) The closest thing you’ll find to a Lincoln Y-block is the engine in AMT’s “Customizing Boat Kit”. Given that the kit is from around 1960 the detail leaves quite a bit to be desired. However I’ve found that the bellhousing and transmission from the OHV V8 in AMT/Lindberg’s 1934 Ford Pickup lines up well with the molded in starter for installation in a vintage style build: Edited 21 hours ago by Chris V 1
junkyardjeff Posted Friday at 04:25 PM Author Posted Friday at 04:25 PM 1 hour ago, Ace-Garageguy said: Yup. Sounds like you have a plan...but the Mk II valve covers won't bolt to an MEL head...at least without an elaborate adaptor...so there's that. If I do it I will use early FE parts to make it work. 1
Robberbaron Posted Friday at 05:00 PM Posted Friday at 05:00 PM (edited) 2 hours ago, Ace-Garageguy said: ^^^ This is the response you need to take to the bank. There's also a thread on this very board (from years ago) discussing just exactly why the engine in the AMT chopped-T double-kit (and its derivatives) is totally, completely wrong for a Y-block Lincoln and what it takes to correct it. See the above link for the 2015 discussion. Edited Friday at 05:04 PM by Robberbaron 1
Trainwreck Posted Friday at 06:34 PM Posted Friday at 06:34 PM (edited) I found this, it's a Franklin Mint diecast '56 Lincoln Continental in 1/24th scale. It's an option if you can find a boneyard version that someone's trying to unload. (this one was over $100) I believe it's a 368 C.I., it doesn't look bad but I wouldn't call it great. Edited Friday at 06:35 PM by Trainwreck
bbowser Posted Friday at 06:47 PM Posted Friday at 06:47 PM 3 hours ago, Ace-Garageguy said: Yup. I first got involved with a search for a good Lincoln Y-block quite some time back while trying to put together bits for a reasonably close representation of Bill Stroppe's '57 Mercury Mermaid, which used a Hilborn-injected 368 Lincoln engine (bored to 387). https://macsmotorcitygarage.com/a-mermaids-tale-bill-stroppes-wild-57-mercury-roadster/ That is wild! 1
1930fordpickup Posted Friday at 07:23 PM Posted Friday at 07:23 PM I do understand why but, It's to bad the 3d printers dont male a good version of the engines not represented in scale. I know not worth thier time. Lord knows we need another version of the SBC to look at. (Yes this is total sarcasm). The problem with all of the 60s kits detail is they were made to be toys and we all now want a better version of rarely seen engine.
junkyardjeff Posted Friday at 08:48 PM Author Posted Friday at 08:48 PM Most likely will use a FE and make it look like it got a engine swap,the FT came out in 64 and to the untrained eye looks like a FE as one fooled me years ago. 2
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now