SteveG Posted August 3, 2014 Posted August 3, 2014 OK, so the 265s of '55 and '56 are red. And the '57 283s are the start of the Chevy orange engines? I always thought Chevy orange came in '58 along with the 348? Not the first or the last time I'll be wrong about something. Scott Close Scott, Chevy engine Orange started in 1955 with the passenger car V8 265 engines, then Chevy went to Red V8's in 1956 cars, although there appears to be a few documented Chevy Orange 265's in '56 cars that were probably leftover '55 production. All the 1957 passenger car V8 engines (265 and 283) would have been Chevy Orange except for the few Chartreuse 265's as noted before. Steve
Craig Irwin Posted August 3, 2014 Posted August 3, 2014 I've owned a lot of early Chevy V8's, and Chevy red and Chevy orange appear to be the same color to me (or very close), no matter what GM called them.
Greg Wann Posted September 12, 2014 Posted September 12, 2014 I picked up a couple of these kits while I was in Indiana. I bought them from RC HOBBIES Plus near Creasy Lane in Lafayette. It is quite a big store. Mostly RC stuff with a good selection of kits too This looks like a pretty nice kit.
unclescott58 Posted September 22, 2017 Posted September 22, 2017 Finially got mine today. It looks pretty good.
unclescott58 Posted September 24, 2017 Posted September 24, 2017 There are two engine blocks in this kit. Other transmissions they both look the same. Anybody know what the difference between the two are? There are other duplicate/variation parts in this kit. But those are pretty easy to figure out.
espo Posted September 24, 2017 Posted September 24, 2017 There are two engine blocks in this kit. Other transmissions they both look the same. Anybody know what the difference between the two are? There are other duplicate/variation parts in this kit. But those are pretty easy to figure out.Look real close at the two different engines and see if one has a manual transmission and one a Power glide transmission. While not mentioned in the instructions they did the same thing on the Black Widow kits.
unclescott58 Posted September 25, 2017 Posted September 25, 2017 Look real close at the two different engines and see if one has a manual transmission and one a Power glide transmission. While not mentioned in the instructions they did the same thing on the Black Widow kits. I wondering why that isn't mentioned? I noticed the kit comes with an extra single pedal I assumed is also for the PowerGlide. Again, non mentioned in the instructions.
Bob Ellis Posted September 27, 2017 Posted September 27, 2017 Nice to hear people talk about buying and building the kit. Rather than just bad mouthing it. I'm looking forward to see a few of these done. Now they need to issue a nice '57 Nomad kit. Maybe not this exact kit. But, a modern tooling based on their more recent '57 Chevys. Scott This Revell Nomad kit is horrible. I threw my kit in the trash back in the 1970s.
unclescott58 Posted September 27, 2017 Posted September 27, 2017 This Revell Nomad kit is horrible. I threw my kit in the trash back in the 1970s.I'm literally finishing building the Monogram '57 Nomad in the next few days. It's an easy build. But looks a little toyish and lacks a lot of detail. I agree about Revell's old '57 Nomad. A very tough kit to build. The best part of that kit was the original box art, that you show above. Thankfully Revell's present '57 convertible has no relationship to either of the two Nomad kits. It a much nicer kit. Revell needs to design a new '57 Nomad based on the same tooling as its other more modern tri-five Chevys.
misterNNL Posted September 28, 2017 Posted September 28, 2017 Possibly we as model builders should concentrate more on what any new kit CAN BE and spend less time whining about it ISN'T. I'm just say'in.
espo Posted September 28, 2017 Posted September 28, 2017 I have a convertible kit that I just never got around to building. I also have a '56 Nomad kit that had the body destroyed by a paint failure. Maybe that would make a good bases for a '57 Nomad.
niteowl7710 Posted October 4, 2017 Posted October 4, 2017 (edited) Possibly we as model builders should concentrate more on what any new kit CAN BE and spend less time whining about it ISN'T. I'm just say'in.Well saying we need a modern tool '57 Nomad is more of a fact than whining. Besides I think everyone already did concentrate on what this kit could be way back 5 years ago when it came out. This is a bit of a zombie thread. Edited October 4, 2017 by niteowl7710
misterNNL Posted October 4, 2017 Posted October 4, 2017 Well saying we need a modern tool '57 Nomad is more of a fact than whining. Besides I think everyone already did concentrate on what this kit could be way back 5 years ago when it cam
Ron Hamilton Posted October 4, 2017 Posted October 4, 2017 I built the original Revell '57 Nomad back in the '60's when I was a teenager, but there was no way that I would touch one of the Monogram Nomad kits due to the proportions of the body. There is a nice resin transkit of a '57 Nomad from Model Car World available if I get the urge, but I believe that Revell will introduce the kit before I get it built. I have a Franken-Resin '68 and '70 Charger to prove the point.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now