Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

Luc Janssens

Members
  • Posts

    3,539
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Luc Janssens

  1. No the current Revell fastback doesn't share anything with this kit, which turned into a funnycar IIRC
  2. easy fix though, just need a pair of scissors. It's kind like with MPC not having the Trans Am licensing back in the day
  3. check out Chris his video....
  4. It's a great build, no doubt about that, but it also shows like sour thumb that the facia is incorrect too much of an angle, the Monogram 1/24th scale kit suffers from the same problem. Time for Revell to tool up a new one based on their coup!
  5. I think he has a successful partnership with Moebius now, where his talent and experience benefits both actors.
  6. IIRC these were done under Ertl management and two with the help of Dave Burket.
  7. Indeed, but think nowadays they use smaller tooling to facilitate the adding of extra parts, to existing traditional non-modular designed tooling. Remember Revell suddenly adding a wagon to the '57 Ford? Depending on tooling design blocking off unwanted parts can be a problem, cuz it might interrupt the flow of plastic, so they either get included as extra part in a kit, or cut off in the pre-packaging state and regrind. But one also has to remember that back in the old days, insert swapping was very common, parts which were originally in one kit, a few years later ended up in another, one example the amt '66 Chevy Impala engine in the '61 Ranchero, MPC really mastered it, and without good records, the headache of engineers in search of an insert to re-release a certain kit. Nowadays newly designed tools incorporate the possibility of several versions, the execution varies between companies. Now Tom, I'm not an engineer, but used to be a problem solver and set up the work sequence and workstation requirements so an operator had the info, tooling, time and the necessary parts to perform his or her task in a ergonomic and foolproof manner, so give me some slack
  8. The announcement say's convertible. AMT PLASTIC MODEL KITS Plastic Model Kits Brand Product # Description Suggested Retail Price Status AMT PLASTIC MODEL KITS AMT-1200 1/25 1964 Olds Cutlass F85 Convertible $35.95 TBA Personally I find it strange that they don't go for a hardtop body when tooling all new, cuz hardtops sell a lot better, perhaps it's because of the interior tub.
  9. It's all about the willingness to put money behind the idea, it takes money to make money. Up until now the tool was waste, an incomplete paid for block of steel that was taking up space and costing money, one can do two things then, (ROI) depending on the state of the tooling, desirability of the subject and restoration costs and that is invest the cash or dump it, simple as that. Revell (before the Hobbico implosion) could do it, and so does Moebius and many other foreign model companies, I think it's more about the focus of the money guy of Round-2, the big savior of the legacy of Amt, Mpc and to a much much much much much lesser extent Lindberg
  10. Yet somehow the military/plane side of the model kit spectrum keeps on getting more detailed, I guess our efforts to bring automotive kits a few notches up are useless....Let's revive Palmer! a quote from the Borg, "resistance is futile"
  11. Hmmm, somehow the topic changed from Round2 to Monogram
  12. This is the post I'm referring to Tim... About the wagon comment, they tooled a lot of the stuff they needed for a wagon, when designing the 4dr. hardtop, only needing the following additional parts - body - side panel extentions for the trunk area or all new side panels - rear seat and backing - trunk floor - clear (windshield, rr side glass and backlite) - rr bumper taillite trim assy - wheels with hubcaps or covers (which they can re-use for a non sci-fy 4dr. h/t) An all new kit or a variant from another tool would cost much much more, and their track record shows that money for automotive projects always seems tight, vs Sci-Fi/fantasy All aforementioned is not set in stone, but that's what I personally think based on monitoring sites like these and my wacky creative brain
  13. By reading here how easy it is to turn it into a 442 I think it is, and the wagon they also talked about I assume is a '67 Chevy Impala.
  14. Even if he knew, it's still not the best kit, and too bad Revell didn't base theirs on their excellent '64;
  15. Can be offered as decals then, the badges I mean.
  16. At least Round-2 puts the parts layout on the box bottom, but the moniker "classic kit" with a bit of history printed on the box would be a plus JMHO
  17. Without the body they had a useless tool, where they paid for, so it's good business sense to tool up a new body (and probably clear too) , cuz now it can make money.
  18. No promo I'm aware of, but there was a resin conversion kit by AAM;
  19. Parts pack cost the same shipping and packaging wise, so for a few bucks more one can buy a std. kit IMHO they could show the endless possibilities mixing and matching in their instructions sheets, promoting the other kits in their lineup
  20. The funny thing is, that back then when it was announced in the '86 Catalog they showed a black '86.
  21. I grew up building Monogram models much more than Amt and Mpc, mostly due to the fact that they built up well and they always had clear headlamps, I never could understand the toy like cheapo molded-in chrome units in the Amt/Mpc kits, but at that age I didn't know about the Promo heritage most of these releases carried. When John Greczula at Round2, had a new grille for the Amt '61 Ranchero tooled with clear headlamps, I thought they were gonna update more kits the same way, but alas the money guy decided otherwise
  22. Moebius is doing the same with for example their Ford P/U's, I call it smart business.
  23. Could that be the "muscle car" they, according to their video are working on?
  24. There's tooling that is worth to be saved and with TLC and some updating will go on and one, but...there are others that really need to be scrapped to make room for all new tools....like the '67 and '70-'72 GTO's, and most of the Lindberg odd ball stuff, that went from production straight to Ollies, and then landfill. I know that nostalgia is a powerful thing, but think one baby boomer trying to build a "nostalgia kit" like he did when growing up, and despite the great box art and colorful decals, it still fits like crapola, he must be thinking, wow this hobby really progressed in these past 40 years, NOT! Just my 2 cents
×
×
  • Create New...