Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

StevenGuthmiller

Members
  • Posts

    15,071
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by StevenGuthmiller

  1. That was what confused me. After 1959, I don't understand why they would produce separate convertible and hard top kits in 1960, then go back to producing a combined convertible/hard top kit again in '61, and then return again to the separate hard top and convertible kits in '62, especially being as all 3 years shared the same roof design. Usually there's some sort of pattern that you can follow with these old annuals, but apparently not in this case. Steve
  2. Just an old fashioned "Dust Buster", or as in my case, a "Dirt Devil" power sweeper works perfect. Everything goes into a small receptacle smaller than your fist, making finding tiny parts simple. Steve
  3. Just a couple of things that might possibly help you in your search Rich. First, there are several kits that you listed parts wants for that will do just as well with parts taken from more modern kits, especially things such as wheel covers. For instance, the '58 Chevy, '59 Edsel, and '60 Impala all have modern counterparts that you can take wheel covers from. (The '58 Edsel "spinner" wheel cover was an available option in 1959) A few of the other parts, such as the '61 Impala chassis, (should be interchangeable with several other annual style Chevrolet chassis from '61-'64) and the '61 Galaxie fender ornaments can be found in the AMT '61 "Club Coupe" reissued in recent years. Another one to scratch off of your list is the '62 Pontiac Bonneville "stock wheel covers". The AMT '62 Bonneville kit never contained stock wheel covers. Only "8-Lug" wheels, which can be found in numerous other kits. I'll scrounge through some of my stuff to see if I can help you with any of the other stuff Rich. Good luck! Steve
  4. Tried something new tonight. Moroccan Harissa-Garlic shrimp with grilled bread. Steve
  5. Well, in retrospect, I suppose it’s possible that the ‘61 may have been offered with the separate top. I may have been too hasty in my observation, as I don’t have a ‘61. But I do have 60 and a ‘62 Imperial hard tops, and they’re molded to the body. I guess I just assumed that they wouldn’t produce a dedicated hard top in ‘60, revert to the separate top in ‘61, and then back to the molded in top in ‘62, but I suppose it’s possible. Steve
  6. The ‘60 and ‘61 Imperial kits had separately tooled bodies for the hard tops and convertibles. There were no separate tops. Steve
  7. Calling it “Molotov” is a very common screw up that I see on Facebook all of the time. Apparently for a lot of guys, Molotov is the correct spelling. ? I’m no “spelling Karen” but I do find it amusing how so many people that swear by the stuff still think it’s called Molotov. That would be like if after using BMF for years, I were calling it “Bright Metal Foil”. ? Steve
  8. Correct. A Molotov is a bottle filled with gasoline with a rag stuffed in it. ? Steve
  9. It’s not that the ink transfers to your fingers. It’s that the finish dulls if it’s handled too much. Steve
  10. You absolutely can use Testors “Wet Look Clear”, or standard Testors “Clear Top Coat” lacquer over enamel. I do it often for chassis and engine parts. My understanding is that “Extreme Lacquer” is hotter, so I would pass on that, but the others should not cause an issue, as long as the enamel is completely cured. Steve
  11. I was thinking about it last night and some names came to mind. Many of them are members of this board. Bill Geary, Dominick Filbotte, Rod Maskew, Bob Jernigan, "Yura1961", just to name a few. They don't all build factory stock exclusively, but they're some of the best builders I've ever seen! (Sorry if I messed up any of your names!) Steve
  12. Strange. Some of the best models I've ever seen, and some of the best modelers I know, build factory stock. I don't think I've ever heard of such a thing. Steve
  13. Well, there you go. Steve
  14. He probably would have gotten a chuckle out of it. Being an “old guy” like most of us, and an observant student of the human condition, he most likely would have thought to himself, “sure, now that I’m gone, they all love me”, but what he might have missed is the fact that many of us honored and respected him while he was here, even though we may not have expressed it. I think that we could all agree that the same sort of reverence could be applied to other past members of the board. Roger Hayes and Richard Manson come to mind. (I hope I got those names right. My name recollection skills are pretty horrendous!) Steve
  15. Chalk it up to experience and move on, right? This is part of the reason why I like to do extensive build threads with my projects. I haven’t built a model in the past 10 years where I didn’t learn something that I wasn’t aware of, and in most cases, in time to correct it on this forum. Build threads have proven to be an invaluable tool for me. Steve
  16. Didn't go that far, but I had a lot of fun on this engine, and discovered a few little detail adding tricks along the way. As you brought up the heads, one simple addition was to do a little additional drilling on the plugs and bolt holes on the ends of the heads. Little things like that can add a lot of depth and dimension to parts that can be a little lacking in detail, and are simple to do. Just fun little things to experiment with. Steve
  17. I may have gone a little too far on my '64, but I scratch made a valley pan for it. Might go a little simpler for my Lemans, but then again, for me, the point was having fun doing it. Steve
  18. The Revell '68 Firebird's intake will work just fine on the '66 GTO engine. I used this exact combo on my '64 Bonneville, and again, modified into a 2-bbl intake for my current '64 Lemans project. As the intake was "open" to the valley pan, I opened up the '68 intake. Steve
  19. Nice work Brian. Yes, the rear suspension could have been moved forward, but it might not be too late. If you could pop the rear axle and springs off without doing any major damage, you could just trim some material from the leading portion of the springs and move the whole thing forward a bit. Just a couple of notes, and not to be an a-hole, but the '62 Chrysler was a uni-body car, and not a full frame construction as is the '57. With that in mind, any of the later Mopar uni-body chassis from the 60s would have been more accurate, and would have very possibly gotten you closer to the correct wheel base. Likewise, the Hemi was not available in '62, so any big block Mopar engine with the dual quad intake would have been more faithful to the '62. In any case, it's a nice representation of a pretty rare kit. Steve
  20. Are there diecast models available of the cars that you're looking for? If you're just looking for something to put on a shelf, you're gonna come out way ahead with a diecast. There are issues with commissioned builds that you probably don't want to deal with. If you can find someone to do it for a reasonable price, you're very likely to get something that's going to be much lower in quality than a diecast. If you can even find anyone who will do it at all, and do it well, it's going to cost you much more than you're likely going to be willing to pay. Just the cost of materials alone to build a "fine" model can get quite high, and then time comes into the equation. How much is an "expert's" time worth? I wouldn't call myself an expert, but I certainly wouldn't even consider working on anything today, unless it was my own, for less than $10.00 an hour, and that would probably only be a possibility if I were doing it for a friend. I don't keep track of my time on a project, but I'm pretty certain that it would reach into the 100s of hours, which at $10.00 an hour, will get you into the thousand dollar range, and that's just labor, and extremely cheap labor at that! Is anyone willing to pay $800.00, $1,000.00, $1,300.00, $1,500.00 for a NASCAR model? I can tell you that I wouldn't! So, your most likely options are, build it yourself, find a diecast equivalent, or get ready to open your wallet beyond it's breaking point if you want a nice commissioned piece.......that is, if you can even find someone. Steve
  21. Yes. I tend to think that I’m a better modeler than a chef, but I do like to do a little cooking when I have the urge. This is the type of food that I really love! Last weekend I made a big pot of Jambalaya! ? Steve
  22. If I'm not mistaken, it seems that I remember hearing of some health issues a while back, but I kept hoping that he would get back on his feet. So sad. I always enjoyed snake on the board. He ruffled some feathers once in a while, and he had strong opinions, and chances are that we may have even had some disagreements between us on occasion, but like adults, we always managed to put any of that aside and be grown ups. I for one will certainly miss him. Steve
  23. One of my wife’s favorites. Chicken Piccata. Spaghetti with toasted garlic and Parmigiana, and a chop salad with honey Dijon dressing. Cold Highlife to wash it down. ? Steve
  24. Alclad "Pale Burnt Metal" looks like it would be a pretty close match. It's the same color that I use on most of my carburetors. If you need an exact match, you can certainly mix a variety of Alclad colors to come up with your own creation. Steve
  25. It's going to have to be a resin or 3-D printed kit. No plastic Cadillac kits from that era ever produced. Possibly some early promos, but not that I'm aware of. Steve
×
×
  • Create New...