Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

StevenGuthmiller

Members
  • Posts

    15,071
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by StevenGuthmiller

  1. That's pretty funny! Maybe it would have gone over a little better with a different color! Steve
  2. Thanks David. The bulbs are the easy part. making a clear lens where none exists now is the difficult part. There are no reflectors or clear lenses with this kit, only a chrome piece. Steve
  3. I agree with everyone else. There are acrylics out there formulated for models & airbrushing. Ceramcoat paints work nicely for fine detailing, but I would never even contemplate painting a kit body with them. Steve
  4. Sounds like a great idea to me! But then again, this is right in my wheel house, so I might be a little bias! Steve
  5. Just came today! A little grungy, but very solid, straight & complete. Steve
  6. Be careful not to get it too tight Kevin. Be mindful of paint thickness. I've had a couple of projects give me a little trouble with the hood fitting perfectly before paint & not so much after 3 or 4 color coats & 3 to 5 clear coats. I make sure now that I leave a bit of a gap to compensate for that. Steve
  7. I just had to do the same thing on my '65 Monaco build. The right front fender seems to be warped outward a tiny bit towards the front bumper, yet the radiator brace is where it belongs & the front bumper fits fine. Not sure where the problem is but the gap is non-existant at the firewall, & as wide as yours at the grille. Weird, but a little styrene strip has taken care of that problem. Steve
  8. I did get a pretty good starting point for not a large investment on that Ford. I know what you mean Bill. I started out the same way. Telling myself I would be happy with a few unusual kits from about '58 to '61. Now I've moved on to the late '60s as well. It can become an addiction very quickly! Steve
  9. First off, I don't know where I would find a set of Polar Lights caps. Besides, I really like the look of the Magnum wheels on this car. The body style is not exactly "racy" looking & I think the Magnum 500s add a "muscle car" touch. I know they're not correct for a '65 Monaco, but hey, I've never really worried too much about being too correct.
  10. I really have no love for restoring kits just for the sake of doing it. I restore them exclusively because I'm interested in the subject matter old annual kits provide & restoring an old built kit is much more economical than shelling out the $200.00-$300.00 that some pristine kits demand. I will say that it is satisfying to see what can be done with a kit that an 8 year old built 50 years ago. Steve
  11. You're probably correct about an unbuilt kit. There's a pristine in the box '63 Ford kit on the bay right now with a starting bid of $150.00 & a buy it now price of $195.00. Too rich for me! I'm not sure I'd call him a "sucker hunter" but I've seen them go for less than that. The '63 Ford That I rebuilt was an unpainted & unmolested built up kit that I got for less than $60.00. Not the best deal in the world, but it was the next best thing to an unbuilt. I'm still quietly on the hunt for a '60 Ford pickup. Steve
  12. I agree. Most of us who are avid builders can instantly smell the difference between a legitimate auction & someone looking for a sucker. I don't mind paying a reasonable price for a kit or a part, hell, I will occasionally pay more than I should if it's something I really want or need. Just today I happened upon a 1963 Ford pickup that was a complete gluebomb that the seller was asking $125.00 for! Uh.....not in this lifetime! You could most likely get an unbuilt kit for less than that! Steve
  13. I guess if you're building a lot of customs the heavier metal flakes are ok, but for the factory stock type builds that I like to do, those heavy flakes just don't cut it if you're looking for realism. But you're correct about control. It's much easier to get the coverage you're looking for with an airbrush & this type of paint. It can also be much easier to destroy a paint job with an airbrush if you're not real familiar with it. I did my share of that early on! Steve
  14. I still use spray cans for some solid colors like red, white or black. Basically anything without metallic in it. But I won't use a spray can for metallic paints. Most of them have metal flakes that are just too out of scale for me. Steve
  15. I stand corrected. I thought the '66 was molded in the gold too. Regardless, they absolutely could have found a better color to mold them in. Or my preference, white! I love their paints Kevin! I will never look back! I don't use MCW clear coat mainly because I use a lot of it & don't want to have to order it through the mail. Same with primer. I've given up on Testors clear & have been using Duplicolor in a rattle can as of late. On this project I'm giving the Duplicolor "Paint Shop" clear a try again. It didn't work so well for me the first time I tried it, but I'm confident it was "pilot error". Seems to be working well this time. The best part is, it comes pre-thinned in a quart can ready to airbrush. That quart should last me quite a while! I'm using a set of Magnum wheels on mine as well, just because I'm not crazy about the look of the stock hubcaps. In my eye the '65 Monaco was a little "stodgy" in the styling department & could use a little icing on the cake. Steve Here are a couple more photos. Nothing really new except one more color coat, which I think made the color a little richer & deeper. Plus the scripts have been done & a couple of clear coats shot.
  16. Fair enough. I prefer to find unpainted, unbuilt kits as well, but depending on subject matter, that can become cost prohibitive very quickly. I don't buy a lot of old painted kits, but I don't let the paint stop me if the deal is right. Some of my favorite restorations started out as painted kits. Steve
  17. Not unusual. I believe all of the MPC '65 & '66 Dodges were molded in that horrendous color. If you do have the 880, that's a real gem! Very difficult to find, as if the Monacos weren't already hard enough to come by. Hang on to that one!! Steve
  18. I don't doubt the veracity of whether or not plastic can become brittle over time, everything deteriorates with age, including me. I've just not seen it myself. I've bought probably 40 kits in the past 3 years, all produced prior to 1969, most of them prior to '61, & I have seen no deterioration that I can detect. I guess my point is, if brittle plastic is the main reason that you would be dissuaded from buying vintage kits, I don't think I'd worry about it a whole lot. Or at least it would be very low on my radar. Steve
  19. Are you sure it's not the 880 kit? I'm not Familiar with either the Monaco or 880 convertible kits, but MPC did do an 880 in '65 as well. My hard top does have the bucket seats. Steve
  20. Thanks guys! That'll be a big help! Steve
  21. Thanks everybody! But what I really need is photos of the "cane" detail. I think I may have a hard time recreating it when I have absolutely no idea what it looked like! Steve
  22. Easily some of the nicest builds I've seen on this forum this year! As a matter of fact, if I were handing out awards, I would give the Charger, Matador & Bonneville 1st, 2nd & 3rd place respectively! And I hate the styling on those Matadors!! Steve
  23. I agree. I've always liked the '67-'69 Barracudas better than the later ones. Great job on this one! Steve
  24. I'm guilty of making my own brittle plastic in years past as well. I achieved it by stripping with finger nail polish remover when I was a kid. But those were new kits. Had absolutely nothing to do with age. I never buy kits that have been primed, ( you never know what's under the primer) & rarely consider kits that have been stripped. I like to find unpainted bodies if possible, & if they are painted, I study the photos very carefully & try to determine what kind of paint was used. It's not always possible but I try to buy kits that were brush painted 50 years ago. They usually strip very easily. I try to avoid anything that looks like it could be lacquer paint. Steve
  25. I understand Casey, & I hope you're right. I just think of the old annuals that have been re-released over & over again over the years & have to wonder why no one would have saw fit to re-release something like the '58 Ford if it still existed. Why would AMT release the '61 Galaxie kit, & not something more lucrative like the '58? Even the '61 being released in club coupe form instead of Starliner or convertible & with the interior from a 4 door tells me that the the Sunliner & Starliner kits are long gone. Most likely most of the old annuals from that era have met the same fate. JMO. Steve
×
×
  • Create New...