Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

StevenGuthmiller

Members
  • Posts

    15,071
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by StevenGuthmiller

  1. I wouldn't hold my breath. Personally, I would be rather surprised if any of those molds still existed. If they were still around, chances are rather high that something from that era would have popped up by now. 58 years is a long time to keep something like that this quiet. Steve
  2. Nice! I have that kit on my '67 "to do list", along with a '67 Galaxie & '67 Chrysler 300. Steve
  3. If anyone can find a couple photos of those interior details, please post them! I haven't bee able to find much either. Steve
  4. I use a mixture of all sorts of different things. Mostly the round Testors 1/2 oz. jars, & a few of the sqaure 1/4 oz. along with a bunch of other stuff. Steve
  5. Wow! That's just nasty! I've never seen such roughness in the paint, especially on that hood. To me that looks like a compatibility problem with the paint & thinner. My suggestion would be to scrap the fingernail polish thing until you get a better grasp on how it reacts. Being a new airbrush user, you may want to start with a simpler "known" system & then work your way up to the polish. There are a lot of paint suppliers who make pre-thinned paints specifically designed for airbrush along with compatible thinners & primers. Possibly start with something like that to get the feel of the operation of the brush before you dive into too many unknowns. Steve
  6. Those guys can be a Godsend for those of us who may need that particular hard to find part for a kit we may already have. I have a Johan 1967 Plymouth Fury kit that was perfect in every way, except for one missing hub cap. If not for one of those "unscrupulous" sellers, it would still be a tricycle. I see no difference as to whether a seller wants to sell whole kits or just parts. If there's a market for them, which there is, why would you not sell them? Steve
  7. I agree. I've built about 30 old annual kits ranging from 1958 vintage to about 1969 & have had absolutely no issues with "brittle" plastic. No different than any new kit that I have experienced. I'm just like Bill. I set a price that I'm willing to pay in my mind before I bid on a kit, & that's usually the one & only bid I will make. If I get it, great! If not, I'll try again on a different one. I'm not sure why it would be puzzling to anyone why prices are high on certain kits. It's all about supply & demand. Steve
  8. Wonderful! I wonder why I never thought of recreating this one! The interior will probably be the tough part. I'll be interested to see how you simulate the smoke rolling out of the windows! Steve
  9. Looks as though you're correct Ron. It took a little searching, but it seems the vinyl top on the '65 Monaco was only available in black & white. So, now I need to give it a little thought. My guess is black, but I'm not sure yet. Steve
  10. Is there the possibility that it could have been special ordered with a Cadillac color? The only copper available in GMs line up in '65 was a Cadillac color called "Samoan Bronze". Could this be the color you're thinking of? Steve
  11. Welcome Ben! It's funny, but I've been a member here for a few years & I would guess that as many as 90% of all the new members are people who went through a lengthy hiatus before returning to the hobby. So you're not alone. I think it's a huge plus for the hobby to have all of these old builders coming back! Hopefully our enthusiasm for the hobby will inspire another generation of builders as well. Steve
  12. Thanks Michael. Actually, this kit has the vinyl roof detail molded in. That's the main reason I'm doing a different colored top. Otherwise, I may have done it body color. I would imagine that white or black would have been the standard vinyl colors, but I think something a little more "earth tone" would go better with this color. Possibly a dark chocolate brown would look good as well. I may consider that. Steve
  13. I'm kind of sick of it myself Matt, but I'm a slob very deep down! And as you know......Well, the "old dogs" thing. Steve
  14. Something along these lines was kind of my thought. I've been dabbling in "press casting" clear parts out of heated clear sprue that works pretty well for headlight lenses. I may try making a mold of the original part & them mold a clear lens. Then I thought about simply drilling a small hole in the back of it & inserting an amber colored "bulb", & then foiling the reflector & surrounding trim. Steve
  15. Added a little color this morning. Still one more coat to go after foiling the scripts but this is about what I'll wind up with. The color is the '65 Mopar "Sandalwood" or "Medium Bronze". I'm thinking of a beige roof of some sort & a saddle interior. Steve
  16. Nope. The entire lens is a chrome piece. That's why it becomes a dilemma. The only thing I can think of is a "dot" of amber, & then paint the entire lens a "milky" white allowing the amber to show through. But I'm afraid that would just look stupid given the "V" shape of the lens. This may be a scratch building situation if I want it to look right. But that seems like a lot of work for a turn signal! Steve
  17. While we're on the subject, does anyone have a good solution for clear turn signal lenses with amber bulbs? my 1:1 '69 Grand Prix had that configuration. The amber bulbs are evident through the clear lens but painting the entire lens amber is incorrect. Of course, the turn signals on the old MPC kit are chrome, so it kind of creates a challenge to make it look correct. I probably won't be building the kit for sometime, but I hope to find an answer before that time comes. Just a side note. The amber reflectors on mine are not correct for '69. My car had some front end damage at one point & the lenses were replaced with 1970 lenses. 1969 lenses were all clear. Steve
  18. Boy Matt, you're too well organized to be a modeler! You should see how I organize my paints. I use the "manure spreader" method! Wherever it lands, it lands. Steve
  19. That's one pretty unique buggy Harry! Can't help but equate the enclosed coach to the old "stagecoach" look. But then again, 1906 wouldn't have been too long after the stagecoach. I'm guessing there wouldn't have been too many bugs in the drivers teeth. The bugs could probably fly faster than the car could go! Steve
  20. Thank you Hugh! Steve
  21. Thanks so much guys! So far in the past few years, I've built Fords from '58-'62. Very soon I hope to do a '67 Galaxie, & I keep getting glimpses out of the corner of my eye of a '56 & '57. Then all I'll have left to do is '63-'66 & '68-'70! Not at all a daunting task! Steve
  22. Looks nice Ron! I just did a quick look around last night & came across a couple of '64 GP kits. You're looking at a couple hundred bucks for an unbuilt kit. Even a good builtup will probably run close to $100.00. Treat it well Al! Steve
  23. Color looks great to me! Steve
  24. Same here. Testors tail light red. Steve
  25. Thank you Cliff! Steve
×
×
  • Create New...