Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

Mark

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    7,363

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Mark

  1. Mark
    #5 are Jo-Han custom wheels, those were in some 1961 and 1962 kits. #2 is from an AMT annual Corvette kit, 1969-77 probably all had them. If #4 fits into an AMT or MPC car tire, it is from an AMT Econoline van kit. The pickup wheel covers were larger, 16-1/2" if I remember right. The tires in those pickup kits may have been shared with 1/32 scale big rigs, I'm not positive about that though.
  2. Mark
    There was also a Monogram '66 Shelby GT350 kit with the dull finish plating. Revell-Monogram had a display at a Toledo toy show that year, I asked them why that was done because it was actually extra work (dull spray over the plating). The reply I got was "we did that because the engine parts on the plated tree needed an aluminum finish, you can apply clear gloss over it to get shiny chrome on the bumpers". My reply was "it's easier for the builder to make bright plating dull, than to make dull plating bright", also that the other Shelby kits had bright plating so they should have been consistent. The T-Bolt kit was out around that time too, as I understand the guy who commissioned that production run had the brainstorm to ask for dull finish chrome. That kit was the first issue of the 'Bolt to be molded in white plastic.
  3. Mark
    So there was overlap between the mid-size and full-size wagons for '64, but not for the rest of the decade. The longer wheelbase and Vista roof gave Buick and Olds a unique identity, separated them from Chevy and Pontiac, and justified their higher price tags. This was back when GM was still very good at separating each division with different features and identity while still sharing unseen, relatively mundane items like chassis and inner sheet metal.
  4. Mark
    Enough difference that someone will point it out if you don't include it! I'm pretty sure they also offered non-Vista wagons also. Why the longer intermediate wagons? Because Buick and Olds weren't offering full-size wagons in those years.
  5. Mark
    If you are patient, it is possible to drill out the flattened headlamp areas in the Modified Stocker bumper, and put headlamps in again. Of course that does nothing about the body, or lost parts like the taillights. The bottom two box art pictures are different panels of the same box. Prior to the Modified Stocker, only the annual and that 1969 "SSS" version were issued. The latter has some changes, including a switch from compact car tires to Polyglas tires. The stock wheel covers are larger in the SSS issue.
  6. Mark
    I haven't seen one of the newer kits without plating, but I'm betting J. Lloyd used the old box art still showing plating! This isn't a first, though. There's a Revell-Germany issue of the Monogram 1/8 scale '32 Ford that has some usually-plated parts furnished in silver plastic. The old Revell double car kits (the ones made up of Custom Car Parts packs) have some of the parts trees in silver or black plastic that were plated when issued as separate packs. I haven't got any of the boxes for those kits, so I don't know how those parts are shown in the box art. If I remember right, the SSP reissue of the Mickey Thompson Challenger I from the late Nineties has the "plated" tree molded in silver. And then there are the Advent issues of Revell car kits, some of which have plating and others that have silver plastic instead.
  7. Mark
    Who's up for a Vista Cruiser wagon conversion? It'll be expensive...two Cutlass bodies and two Chevelle wagon roofs and chassis (all to get the extra length in the wheelbase and rear doors)...
  8. Mark
    I read somewhere (and it sounds plausible) that GM went with the aluminum engine for the Vega to use foundry capacity left idle with the demise of the Corvair. GM didn't use a whole lot of cast aluminum prior to the Corvair, they made a big investment in facilities for it, as did Reynolds Aluminum. The silicon impregnated block was something GM was toying with for a while. GM's habit of using its customers as guinea pigs (particularly on the cheaper cars) and treating buyers of cheaper cars as second-class citizens cost them big time over the long haul.
  9. Mark
    If your interpretation of AMT is as the original, stand-alone company located in Troy, Michigan, the 1978 catalog lists the VW Rabbit kit as a March 1978 release, and a 1/48 scale Martin B-26B as a September release. I'm not sure the plane was even issued, let alone whether or not it was an AMT item and not shared with (or tooled by) some other company. The last all-new car kit would have been the Rabbit. The last scheduled releases by the original company would have been the two Firestone Super Stones Ford pickups (F-350 and Courier) in October 1978. The 1979 catalog cover reads "AMT Hobby Kits" and "Lesney Products Corporation 1979". At that point AMT had become a brand name which was the property of another company. However the mid-year 1979 flyer calls the company "Lesney AMT Corporation", so the argument could be made that it was still a stand-alone operation. But the purchase by Ertl in 1982 signifies a definite change to being strictly a brand name under the control of a larger entity.
  10. Mark
    Sometimes the yellowing is due to the display area being contaminated by smoke (being in the home of a smoker) or even fluorescent light. I'd treat the parts as though they were painted, and clean them the same way. You'd clean even brand new parts before priming or painting, these would be no different.
  11. Mark
    Rock Auto, baby...all the parts your car will ever need! I bought a few parts for my '62 Fairlane (with a '74 250 I6/C4 automatic) a few weeks ago...spark plugs a buck and a half apiece (platinum, yet!), motor and transmission mounts under $4 each, universal joints under ten bucks (USA manufactured, too) and a water pump for $23. All name brand stuff, too. You do have to watch the shipping to make sure you aren't paying for another package while saving ten cents on a gasket, but the website gives you that information.
  12. Mark
    First version of the Ford van was the Vantom (Round 2 reissue calls it the Phantom, box art and decals otherwise the same). That one was on store shelves in early '75, as the 1:1 van was first showing up on dealers' lots. I think the '77 Cruising Van was the next version, followed by those three oddball custom-only kits (Disco Van, Hyper Hut, Cuckoo Nest).
  13. Mark
    I think I have a '78 catalog, will check later. The VW Rabbit may have been the last all-new kit. The Scirocco shares some parts with it as I understand. The '41 Plymouth was issued as a stock only version prior to the street rod.
  14. Mark
    1978, when Lesney stepped in. Not sure what the last all-new kit was, but the Super Stones version of the Ford F350 pickup may have been the last release prior to the sale. I'm pretty sure I have a flyer for that kit with the Troy, Michigan address on it.
  15. Mark
    MPC Firebird annual kits ('67-1/2, '68, '69), all reissues of the '69 including the one (1982) issue of the convertible, and one early Eighties issue MPC '69 Camaro (the one molded in black). Most issues of the MPC Daytona Transporter Truck have one also (except the one sold with the Ramchargers dragster).
  16. Mark
    The 153...the engine that should have been used in the Vega!
  17. Mark
    The size of the package has always been a big deal with USPS, but has gotten more so in recent years. I remember in my eBay selling days, changing the box on an item I sent to England because the original shipping box was something like 1/4" too large one way or another. Changing boxes cut the shipping cost by several dollars.
  18. Mark
    The original kit did not include a raised convertible top. Had one been added, it would likely be included in the test shot photos.
  19. Mark
    My understanding is that the last "run" of police car kits was packaged from already-molded parts obtained in the sale. All of the already-molded clear parts were the green tinted ones, so Okey had someone do the vacuform glass in order to include a set of clear windows in those kits. The vacuform in the one kit I bought was unusable. The only kits newly molded under Okey's ownership were the '59 Rambler wagon and snap Chrysler Turbine car. I heard somewhere that the '66 Rambler wagon was intact, but nobody ever backed that statement up. Who now owns the tools that Moebius displayed at that one trade show, who really knows for sure?
  20. Mark
    I cheated on this one, as I never had any of those double kits complete...I looked at the Drastic Plastics instruction sheet scans. The tooling alterations were probably done to allow the use of one or two fewer parts trees in these kits. For a typical double kit, I count two engines, two chassis, one chassis accessory pack, one wheel pack, and one body (dragster body is included with the chassis pack). Add four tires and four slicks, and that's it.
  21. Mark
    If Atlantis issues the Mooneyes dragster in the same form as the original, be prepared to change a thing or two to get a more accurate model. The original double kit uses the front suspension parts from the roadster chassis accessory pack (same as the other double kits), also the engine pack includes a Hydra-Matic transmission which was not in the 1:1 dragster. I wonder if they will attempt reissuing the other double kits. Two of the three use the Chrysler engine which is assumed to now be in the Miss Deal Studebaker kit, and one uses a Chevy engine pack which now resides in the '57 hardtop kit.
  22. Mark
    That must be what was done. I no longer have one, but the kit I had had a convertible body with the hood molded shut, and no windshield frame.
  23. Mark
    That's it. No MPC showroom stock kit for '72.
  24. Mark
    Nope, there were three. The '72 promo was MPC, check the tires and wheels next time you see a '72. MPC and AMT (then competitors) both sold NASCAR Monte Carlo kits in 1973. MPC's was the CooCoo Marlin car, their kit had the fits-all two-piece chassis. AMT's was/is the Bobby Allison car. Two totally different kits from competing companies. The MPC NASCAR kit body was then converted to the dirt track car. Anyone who disagrees is invited to explain how Round 2 can still issue both the NASCAR and dirt track kits...
  25. Mark
    Nope, there are three: the newer stock '70, the old AMT '70-'72 which is now the Allison stock car, and the MPC '72 promo body which was converted to a NASCAR body in '73, then altered into the dirt track body pictured above. MPC (a competitor to AMT in 1972) never offered an early Monte Carlo as a kit with a showroom stock version. But they did make the '72 promotional model.
×
×
  • Create New...