
Mark
Members-
Posts
7,136 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Gallery
Everything posted by Mark
-
Never seen that before. If you've got plastic on the lower side, don't bust it out. I'd fill with two-part epoxy filler on top. The first layer would fill most of the divot (pack it into the corners, don't leave gaps), then grind or sand the edges of it to feather in the final fill.
-
Two-part filler of some sort, either glazing putty or epoxy. One-part spot putty from a tube will shrink over time, you don't want that in a prominent place. I didn't notice it was a hole, the same still applies but you must have something below to close that off. Use CA glue for the patch, solvent cement will take time to fully cure and, like the one-part spot putty, will shrink.
-
That's a rear bumper guard from a '51-'55 Kaiser. One can be found in the AMT '49 Ford coupe kit.
-
The chrome part is from a Monogram '57 Chevy. It's part of the stock fuel injection setup.
-
DupliColor sealer not drying.
Mark replied to NOBLNG's topic in Model Building Questions and Answers
I don't know whether or not Duplicolor offers non-spray sealer, but automotive paint companies do. The smallest available amount is probably a quart...even if you split the cost with a couple of guys, you'll still have more than you will need. Cost will be way less than the spray cans too. -
DupliColor sealer not drying.
Mark replied to NOBLNG's topic in Model Building Questions and Answers
If you are going to decant it anyway, why not just start with a can (not a spray can, just a pint or quart) of sealer? -
DupliColor sealer not drying.
Mark replied to NOBLNG's topic in Model Building Questions and Answers
It may have been purchased six months ago, but how long has it been sitting in a warehouse or on the store shelf? The typical 60 second or so shake might not be enough. It's not thoroughly shaken until the agitator ball slides freely around the base of the can when it is lightly moved around. I'd make sure it is ready to go the day before, then give it the 60 second shake just before using. -
I don't get the people slagging on Foose. The cars done on his TV show were light years ahead of the "flames and skulls" stuff done on most of the other drama fests. His dad was (is?) Sam Foose, a somewhat well-known customizer in his own right. Sam worked for Gene Winfield at the short-lived AMT Speed & Custom operation in Phoenix, where they built some TV cars. If I remember right, he built the Get Smart Sunbeam, worked on the full size Star Trek shuttle, and a '31 Chevy roadster that transformed into a Camaro convertible for a TV show. Chip Foose was a designer for Boyd Coddington, and was asked to run the wheel company after it went bankrupt (that's where the split between the two originated). Of all the TV show guys, there aren't many I'd hire to build a car for me, but he'd be on the short list.
-
Even some of the "name" customizers sometimes lost sight of the fact that the car was supposed to look better after all of the alterations were done. Sometimes they were just chasing show points for each change, other times they were making the alterations to the customer's vision. As to the latter, it was a menswear designer that said "when it comes to matters of taste, the customer is always right"...
-
When did the AMT 49 Ford kit come out
Mark replied to junkyardjeff's topic in General Automotive Talk (Trucks and Cars)
For the '49, a Meteor grille could be converted from a Mercury grille, and the grille surround could be trimmed from the kit's custom front pan. -
1965 Belvedere info needed.
Mark replied to Brutalform's topic in Model Building Questions and Answers
It must have varied depending on the assembly plant and/or time of year. One of my brothers had two '65 Belvedere Is at the same time. One was a low mileage original paint car bought from the original owner. Neither of them had that trim on the back. -
Why do old TV shows on DVD look stretched horizontally?
Mark replied to LDO's topic in The Off-Topic Lounge
The cheaper/smaller the TV is, the fewer features I'd expect, and those that are present can be expected to be cruder than on a more costly TV. Too, Walmart usually wants the lowest price on a particular item, so one bought there will likely not be quite as good as the same size TV of the same brand bought elsewhere. The appliance stores play a similar game: "nobody can beat our price on this item" because the larger chains get their own model numbers. The instruction manuals always list multiple model numbers...all may have the same features but only one store in a given area will have a particular model number. -
A few of the bucks spent on all of the add-ons might have been better spent on a set of rear springs. Right now it's got long rear shackles and those clamp-on helper springs, and it ain't much higher than stock in back. Besides the paint mismatch, I'd be taking a long look at how those skirts are attached. I'm seeing what look like exposed fasteners, and that ain't good.
-
When did the AMT 49 Ford kit come out
Mark replied to junkyardjeff's topic in General Automotive Talk (Trucks and Cars)
Some of the original issue kits were molded in black, some in light blue, but most were gray. The late Seventies Barris Cruisin' USA issue was also molded in black. -
Help me please! What car is this?
Mark replied to Andy Oldenburg's topic in General Automotive Talk (Trucks and Cars)
Looks like a '58 to me. -
Why do old TV shows on DVD look stretched horizontally?
Mark replied to LDO's topic in The Off-Topic Lounge
Can't you adjust the picture setting on the TV set to accommodate the video image? I'm still in disbelief that, when television was created, it's screen wasn't proportioned the same as a theater screen. Someone had to have figured, even then, that old movies would eventually end up on TV. -
The more often I look at that (ex) Revell Corvette, the more I end up thinking it's the best one out there, or very nearly so. The SMP/AMT one was the promo, but the body sides are a bit flat among other things. MPC's body is pretty decent, but it has the '57 interior bucket. Every Pro Modeler '58 or '59 I have seen seems to have the chassis hanging out too much underneath. That old Revell one has a couple of small things to fix, but the built ones I have seen all look "right".
-
MPC 1973 Camaro hood question
Mark replied to BIGTRUCK's topic in Model Building Questions and Answers
No. The AMT hood is wider, and neither the sculpturing nor the cut line at the front matches up. -
Can anyone identify these drag slicks ?
Mark replied to styromaniac's topic in Model Building Questions and Answers
They are MPC, and we're used in a couple of their front engine dragster kits like the Ramchargers car. Not used in any funny car kits I'm aware of, but they were also used in the Malco '60 Corvette and Multi Maverick. Also the '71 and '72 Dodge Sportsman van kits that had the dual engine setup. -
With all of the body/chassis attachment back there, I wouldn't even try to open the tailgate on that wagon. I'd bet the rear load floor in the interior isn't where it should be (probably too high relative to the lower edge of the tailgate). A headache from the get-go IMO.
- 38,428 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- johan
- glue bombs
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Thoughts and ideas that hold forever true..........
Mark replied to JollySipper's topic in The Off-Topic Lounge
Knowledge is being aware that tomatoes are by definition a fruit. Wisdom is knowing you shouldn't put them in a fruit salad... -
Too, Chrysler was starting to cut corners here and there (decals instead of pot metal emblems, for example). They were already on the road to the financial troubles that came to a head later in the decade. The fact that they didn't have a domestically built subcompact (instead having to import them) was the first sign of trouble...