Mark

The "elephant standing on the bathroom scale" logo. As an anti-theft measure, they can just make the emblems bigger...

Going by the first one, and much of everything they have produced since, I would guess not. If anything, they seem to have doubled down on corner-cutting.

I remember test driving the first-generation Colorado when it first appeared in 2004. Cheap, cheap, cheap. The inner door panels flexed when the power window went up or down. I tested four trucks; the Colorado was the first one knocked out of consideration. Chevy dealers clearing out the last of the S-10s before bringing in the Colorados should have been a sign. I'd probably have tried an S-10 had any been on the lot other than crew cab 4 X 4s. Later I found I had dodged a bullet. The straight five cylinder engine struck a balance: the performance of a four with the economy of a six. No GM for me, thank you.

The one thing you can say about that guy, was that he put his money where his mouth was, and wasn't content to just let others test the thing out by themselves. The other thing is, it's about time that site was left alone. It's a gravesite, not a theme park.

For the templates, you can use other plastic like old credit cards or used-up gift cards. The advantage to using a template as opposed to tape, is that you can flip the template over and use it on both sides to get everything nice and symmetrical.

I would use either two-part epoxy or catalyzed spot putty (like Evercoat) on the door lines, after routing them out a bit. Pretty much any filler that works on styrene will work on most resins, provided the resin has been cleaned and prepped same as you would with styrene. I once used PC-7 on an extensively modified plastic body that I used as a master for resin casting, both to fill seams and to build up the wall thickness of the body in some areas. In fact, I used it on a master for a trailer body and lid also. Still have both masters, both are in great shape.

No currently available kit contains either the full wheel covers or the smaller "dog dish" hubcaps needed for the '67. The aftermarket may have something. Both the full wheel covers and hubcaps are unique to the 1967, and the wheel cover centers needed for this car differ from the SS wheel covers in the original 1967 kits.

They have abandoned and alienated the people who built them. First by analyzing how well some people were doing, then trying to grab as much of that as possible. Second by trying to become another Amazon, leaving the remaining sellers behind because they (eBay) weren't able to squeeze any more out of them.

Not positive about this, but the Revell '57 convertible kit might have one. If it does, it would be the style that attaches to the rear bumper and not the type that moves the stock bumper further away from the body.

I'm still wondering why so many military subject model kits get lumped in with the automotive stuff. I guess eBay uses the "supermarket" business model, where they move items around the store every so often. The longer they keep you in the store, the more you are likely to spend...

eBay Motors. 92,000,000 auto parts and accessories, which, in any search you attempt, ALL of them fit YOUR car!

The one-piece units would have to be better finished, then plated or at least powder coated. Two-piece, stamping for sheath has to be decent, lug nut underneath can look like krap as long as it works.

Only one reason manufacturers use those two-piece lug nuts...they're CHEAPER. They've been using them for years. Condensation gets between sheath and nut, causes rust, expands the inner part a little bit spreading the sheath. Throw in freezing moisture in certain areas, and top it off with the grease monkeys using the rattle gun to loosen and tighten them. I replaced them with solid nuts on a couple of vehicles, current car had solid ones as built.

I'd rather have a "too big" engine that loafs along much of the time, as opposed to "sending a boy to do a man's job". A turbo is fine for a momentary power boost for passing or going up hills, but using it to crutch up a too-small engine isn't going to end well.

The two front springs are the same width, just the arch is different.

"Suicide style" still uses a leaf spring; there's no setup I'm aware of where a rigid attachment to the frame is used for a front axle, even on a drag racing chassis. With the "suicide" setup, instead of the leaf spring attaching to a full-width crossmember, it instead attaches to a narrow perch that is itself attached to the front of a crossmember. It looks more fragile, as if the perch has the potential to break off and let the front of the chassis drop to the ground...hence, "suicide style".

Two words... "Safety equipment"... Read the info on the can. For the stuff we're doing, a dehydrator might be the way to go.

Don't let Popeye find out...

J.C. Penney tried to eliminate "sale pricing" a couple of years ago, and just sell everything at their lowest price every day. Their sales tanked, and they wound up going back to business as usual. I guess most people want to go away thinking they "got a deal".

Powertrain was changed quite a bit between the Hemi Under Glass and LA Dart. Besides the whole setup being reversed (to put the engine behind the rear wheels), it was changed from fuel injectors to a supercharger, and the headers were changed. There were other tweaks to the chassis also, like the roll cage being altered. I believe the Barracuda had the back of the cage behind the shortened interior bucket, while the Dart has the whole cage inside the bucket. I'm pretty certain most, if not all, of the engine was retooled including the block.

The MPC '71 Camaro molded in white is a tough item...all of the ones I have ever seen (including a couple of them I had/have) were yellow. From where they seem to turn up, many MPC '71 kits molded in colors (not counting the pre-fogged custom jobs) were sold in the Eastern half of the country with the white ones going west.

When a particular kit is listed, you should be okay. The "assortments" or generic descriptions are another story. You might think you are getting a Supernatural Impala because of the item pictured, but you might wind up with a 007 Mustang kit.

Two different things here. The 1:1 Nova with a swapped-in small-block with FI was, and is, certainly doable. Several were built back then using the Corvette FI setup. The V8 installation parts were available at the Chevy dealers' parts counter on day one. The AMT wagon kit has a straight six engine (no factory V8 in '63, even though the '63 hardtop and convertible kits had it). Optional parts include a Hilborn type aftermarket racing injection setup. Looking back, anyone building racing injection setups back then were probably already making one to fit the Chevy II four cylinder engine, as it became instantly popular with the midget racing crowd. Since that four was literally two-thirds of a Chevy II six, putting together an injection setup for the six would have been pretty simple.

The six-cylinder engine FI setup is aftermarket. Hilborn, or other fuel injection companies, didn't offer injection setups for every single engine out there, but could probably piece together existing parts to create one for a paying customer. Those weren't timed FI units as would be used on a street driven vehicle, but constant flow fuel injection as used in a racing application. Some guys did run those on the street, it could be done, but it wasn't done easily or often back then.

Those were in the '41 Willys gasser kits also (the newer one, not the old opening-doors one).