tim boyd

OK, here is the complete list of parts used for this project! Hope this helps (or at least generates more conversation (smile)). TB ******************* Sources: Revell ’48 Ford Chopped Custom Coupe 3 in 1 #85-4253 (issued in 2011): Body, hood, windshield, headlights and headlamp bezels, basic interior components, floor pan, etc. AMT/Ertl ’53 Ford Pickup Street Machine #6341 (issued in 1991): Frame, rear suspension/axle/differential (also optional choice for front suspension assembly), exhaust headers. Note: this same frame and suspension are found in all issues of MPC’s 1957 Chevy Gasser and 1953 Ford Pickup kits, which were each reissued several times, most recently as the Model King reissue of the MPC “Spirit of ‘57” Chevy circa 2006. Revell K. S. Pittman ’41 Willys Drag Coupe #85-4990: Front suspension assembly, rear ladder bars, roll bar, steering wheel and column, gas pedal, shifter, bucket seats (from tow kits), exterior door handles, rear tube bumper and brackets, parachute. Note: Revell’s prior John Mazmanian #85-2350 and Stone Woods and Cooke #85-2032 (black car) ’41 Willys kits both have these same components; Revell’s original Stone Woods and Cook “Swindler II” (blue car) kit dating from 1963 and its many reissues are based on an entirely different kit. AMT/Ertl ‘67 Mustang GT/GTA and 1967 Shelby GT500 kits (first issued in 1994/95 and reissued multiple times since, we used #31550 issued in 2002): basic engine and transmission assembly AMT/Ertl Surf Woody “Buyer’s Choice” #31921 (issued in 2003; prior versions of this kit date from the mid-late 1960’s and are very expensive collectibles): cross-ram intake manifold, carbs, valve covers, “Shelby” deep sump oil pan. Note: A similar cross-ram intake, carbs, and dual air cleaners can be found in Round 2’s AMT ’66 Mustang kit # 794-12 (currently available) MPC ’69 Charger 500 #6284 (issued in 1987), MPC ’69 Charger Daytona #6278 (issued in 1990): Instrument panel. Note: the same parts are found in MPC’s 1968-1970 Charger annual kits which are expensive collectibles; however he later MPC reissues referenced above sell at very reasonable prices from the usual old kit sources. Revell Tony Nancy “22 JR” Roadster and Dragster Double kit #85-1224: Rear Wheels and Tires AMT/Ertl ‘76 Chevy Caprice with Trailer # 38454 (issued in 2006); #3001 (issued in 1999 and 2001) Front wheels. Note: the same wheels are found in MPC’s 1968-1972 Corvette annual kits, and are likely available from aftermarket resin casters Mark Budniewski: Pontiac “drag car” scoop (originally a Ford HD truck item); mbudniewski@aol.com Slixx Decals Rat Rod and Nose Art 1 #RRNA1-7136: all exterior decals except Mooneyes. www.slixx.com. Note: item is not currently in the Slixx catalog as this is written Tamiya #TS-29 Semi-Gloss Black; #TS-79 Semi-Gloss Clear Testors Metalizer paints in five different colors, Testors Dull-Cote Parts Box: Carburetor air intake horns, ’39 Ford teardrop tailamp lenses, front tires

Heh....thanks Bill. I do recall you (I think it was you) having been very outspoken (and also correct) about the chassis stance/rake of most 1960's era Gassers, and as seen in this model and based on my own recollections of back in the day, I very much agreed with your position on this subject! TB

OK guys, so I had to go look up my reprint of the online only build article from the other model mag's publisher. It appeared only on their website starting on December 11, 2012, so I guess the nearly ten years since then is reason enough for my memory to less than perfect. ( As that website is now gone, so is the article.... ) If I can find the original text document, I will copy and repost here the detailed list of parts sources here. In the meantime, the highline chassis summary is that the Revell KS Pittman Willys (as Brian suggested above) and the MPC '53 F-100 Flip Front kit (which has the same chassis/running gear as their MPC '57 Chevy Bel Air two door sedan flip front as Dennis mentioned) were the two most key sources for my build. Six other kits contributed parts as well. So....stand by for possible further updates! TIM

Thanks Dennis, Dave, Gary, Scott....and....Scott! ' ******************* Dennis....yes, that was my reaction too. But when you are writing for the mags, and the mag reader feedback is.....well, I had to keep that in mind for future projects. Surprisingly enough, it came not only from more mainstream/less advanced builders, but also from a name or two I think a number of you would recognize and who I still, to this day, highly respect for their modeling talent, and in once case, for his personal friendship. I think also today people are more aware of the outcome down the road (when trying to sell a kit) of having sourced just a part or two from that box when building their latest project. And there is so much good stuff in the aftermarket that you don't really need to raid the kit inventory like we used to do. (Yep, I am rationalizing here....smile.) Of course, back in the MPC national contest days we could have cared less. It was always (at least for me), look through your entire kit inventory and choose the single part that was the most detailed and best application for the future contest winner taking shape on your desk...! Best to you all....TIM

If you haven't checked out Roger Hayes' cool '32 Chevy Cabrio hot rod completion, do it first. Then you can look at two of my three builds based on this tooling. Mine were built in the mid 1970's, right around 1980, and lastly, around 1990 or so. More details and images here: (images 68-74): Boyd Phaeton/Touring, Cabriolet, and Convertible Hot Rods album | Funman1712 | Fotki.com, photo and video sharing made easy. More images and details here (images #20-34): Boyd Roadster Hot Rod Pickups album | Funman1712 | Fotki.com, photo and video sharing made easy. Sadly, looks like I don't have any digital images of the third build, the original MPC "1933 Sedan Delivery" kit, but I believe this was featured in an abbreviated buildup in my Street Rodder Modeler's Corner column around 1980 or 1981. Thanks for looking, and again, my kudos to Roger on his recent completion....TIM

What Alan said....great discussion here, guys! TB

Andy, not sure if you are directing your question to me, but if you are, a 429 SCJ with the Ram-Air setup would be my first choice.....TB

Alan, I respect your perspective and thoughts on many model car related issues. However, in this case related exclusively box art, I as both a modeler and a retired Marketing Executive am a very big supporter of Round 2's revisiting original and early reissue box art in their current product range. I suspect Round 2's leadership team, were they willing to go on the record (publicly, that is), would confirm that their current approach to box art for reissues is a key "why buy" for many of their customers. I also realize that this could be a generational preference, and that model builders of more recent generations may have no emotional or other connection to these "old timer" box art configurations....TIM

Roger....very, very tasty. Best of all, it's done. I don't ever remember anyone building this kit just the way you did, so kudos on a very creative and very realistic interpretation of the subject! TIM

Derrick....very, very, very nice! Way to go....TB

Compared to another Revell kit tooling where I was asked to critique some first-round test shots, these photos show an already very refined product. Still, six months sounds a little optimistic to me. In any case, certainly will be something to look forward to! TB

Rex...cool Sprint kitbash!!!! TB

Patrick - Personally, I'm not much of a fan of the '73, but I'd love to see the 1972 Sprint as another derivative of the new Boss 351 tool....great idea! TB

Very cool project, and truly great Barry Lobeck-esque stance, too! Bravo....TB

FWIW, and if I am remembering correctly, I have counted among these 12 pages of speculation just three guesses that more or less align with what I think this project might actually be. So, if my hunch turns out to be correct, nearly everyone here is going to have a very big surprise when they finally make the announcement Of course, just like everyone else here, I could be totally wrong!!!! TB

Thanks James for the excellent photos and coverage of the kit reveals.... All....I am pretty sure you can count on a Mach 1 version of the '71 Mustang (with appropriate power under the hood) to be in place for a future version of the kit tool... TB

Dave...I seem to recall the rear fenders coming from the Revell '32 Street Rod series (probably the three or five window Coupe kits), although they were cut down in a manner similar to the real cars that inspired the model. I don't have time right now to check for sure, but I think this was covered in some detail in the two-part article feature on the car in the other model magazine about 10-12 years ago or so. And thanks for the comments! TB

Ian....no nods intended but interesting that you see that link. Maybe it was active in my subconscious as I build the car??? Thanks for the comments...TB

Rodney - Loaded with character, excellent workmanship, and tons of period correct detail. Bravo! Like others here, I also especially like your color choice. Way to go! TIM

Paul, thanks for your thanks. One of the most enjoyable parts of the hobby for me is being able to draw attention to the variety of model car topics and the skills and creativity of their builders out there (here) in the world of model car builders. Connecting two talents like you and Tim Slesak is a big part of that. Cheers....TB

John...that is great info you just gave us. Congrats on owning such a cool car (particularly in Grabber Lime....so. so cool!!!), and thanks from all of us for letting Revell scan your car while developing their kit. Best regards....TIM BOYD

Roger....looking really good so far. Cool build idea and cool execution! FYI only, here's the model Dennis referenced above in his post above,,, Like many others I am sure, I'll be watching your progress on this one. TIM

Very, very nicely done! Congrats, and thanks for sharing them here! TB

That is one sharp looking Bronco model! Really, really well done! Congrats to you Roger or if you did not build it, to whoever else did it....TB

Guys, just a caution that I've noticed over the last few years that "ScaleMates" kit info is sometimes partly or completely wrong. Always a good idea to authenticate any important info seen there with a post on this or other authoritative Model Car forums/boards....TB