I think some of you might be misinterpreting the numbers. Everything is compared to a mythical 100 that equals the internet average. For instance, the two bars that show male vs. female don't tell you anything about how many females we have as compared to males. It just shows that our percentage of males is well above the average for the internet and our percentage of females is well below the internet average. That sounds believable to me. In short, though, it's a pretty unclear way to present data.
BTW, how did they get the data?