FordRodnKustom Posted November 14, 2015 Share Posted November 14, 2015 I just picked this up on a 40% off coupon. I was more curious about it that anything else because I've never seen or had one of these kits before. I'm not a big MOPAR guy. Looks like a good kit, should build up into a sharp replica with a little work. Here's what's in the box for anyone interested. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stavanzer Posted November 15, 2015 Share Posted November 15, 2015 Man, that is one STOUT rear axle in that thing! Are the tyres the smooth, treadless knid? It's hard for me to tell from the Pic.Great Pics, Ron! This scratches this one off the list of kits I'd like to purchase. There is no problem with that, however. It just frees up more $$$ for other kits I want. Thanks, Alan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FordRodnKustom Posted November 15, 2015 Author Share Posted November 15, 2015 Man, that is one STOUT rear axle in that thing! Are the tyres the smooth, treadless knid? It's hard for me to tell from the Pic.Great Pics, Ron! This scratches this one off the list of kits I'd like to purchase. There is no problem with that, however. It just frees up more $$$ for other kits I want. Thanks, AlanYes, they are treadless, slick type racing tires. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stavanzer Posted November 15, 2015 Share Posted November 15, 2015 Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1972coronet Posted November 15, 2015 Share Posted November 15, 2015 That LA-Series engine certainly appears to be nicer than the stock 318--340-360 that the vans , Duster / Demon / Dart Sport , etc. , engines ! I realise that it's representative of the 355 cube Direct Connection "R" small block , but at least the base block & heads look nice .Not sure what diff / housing that is supposed to represent ... Not a Dana nor is it the Chrysler 8 3/4 . any ideas ?I'll most likely grab one of these kits for its parts contents ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'70 Grande Posted November 15, 2015 Share Posted November 15, 2015 There are alot of things to like about this kit, and a few to be aware of when building it. Others have previously-posted/discussed their thoughts that the overall engine is scaled alittle bit too small for being a 355-CI Mopar "R" small block, but in my opinion, once it's built-up, it looks pretty good. My biggest concern with this kit is the track of the front wheels if built using all of the kit's front suspension and wheel pieces. Using the kit's pieces, the 2 front tires will stick-out a long, long ways from underneath the front fenders; unrealistically wide in my opinion. Correcting this wide-track condition by modifying the kit pieces looks to me like an extensive undertaking, so my plan was to swap-out the 2 front inner wheel pieces with 2 from a mid-1990's AMT/Ertl Nascar kit as these inner wheel piece's mounting-point is much deeper inside the wheel, thus, pulling-in the width of the 2 front tires once finally assembled.The original release of this kit was heavily-based on an actual, 1:1 Chrysler Kit Car and does a really good job of looking like the real thing once completed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FordRodnKustom Posted November 15, 2015 Author Share Posted November 15, 2015 There are alot of things to like about this kit, and a few to be aware of when building it. Others have previously-posted/discussed their thoughts that the overall engine is scaled alittle bit too small for being a 355-CI Mopar "R" small block, but in my opinion, once it's built-up, it looks pretty good. My biggest concern with this kit is the track of the front wheels if built using all of the kit's front suspension and wheel pieces. Using the kit's pieces, the 2 front tires will stick-out a long, long ways from underneath the front fenders; unrealistically wide in my opinion. Correcting this wide-track condition by modifying the kit pieces looks to me like an extensive undertaking, so my plan was to swap-out the 2 front inner wheel pieces with 2 from a mid-1990's AMT/Ertl Nascar kit as these inner wheel piece's mounting-point is much deeper inside the wheel, thus, pulling-in the width of the 2 front tires once finally assembled.The original release of this kit was heavily-based on an actual, 1:1 Chrysler Kit Car and does a really good job of looking like the real thing once completed. Thanks for that building tip! I didn't know that and I'll keep an eye out for that flaw when I'm building mine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete L. Posted November 15, 2015 Share Posted November 15, 2015 (edited) Folks, I see that the new decal sheet allows the builder to construct either the #43 car or Joe Milikan's #04 that ran out of the Petty shops 'back in the day". Edited November 15, 2015 by Pete L. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
426-Hemi Posted December 17, 2015 Share Posted December 17, 2015 Sadly, I'm not sure the engine in this one comes even close to an LA small block. the oil filter impression is missing, and the valve covers, NOT to sure what they truely look like from the kit, but they don't look like no LA valve cover I've ever seen (I know the 355 were different) but how much different? Weren't they just an over bored 318 or 340? I don't think they had enough lower end "roll" to be stroked to heavily.ANYWAY, I'm on this on to see if its something I'd want for parts, I'd LOVE to get a good pic of the hood and grille!Now to state the obvious, to me, the best Mopar small block model yet, has to go to the AMT '71 Plymouth Duster 340.... That car (I own 2 of those models) has an awesomely detailed "340" in it, BUT as a model would suffice to be anything from a 318 to a 360. that were the "LA" class motors from Mopar. AND if done right, you can add a 2 barrel intake, a 4 barrel intake or a 6 pack intake! -Unless I can see better detail revealing pics, I'd buy one of these kits for mere parts.... Not sure I'd go to build it.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Haigwood Posted December 17, 2015 Share Posted December 17, 2015 Sadly, I'm not sure the engine in this one comes even close to an LA small block. the oil filter impression is missing, and the valve covers, NOT to sure what they truely look like from the kit, but they don't look like no LA valve cover I've ever seen (I know the 355 were different) but how much different? Weren't they just an over bored 318 or 340? I don't think they had enough lower end "roll" to be stroked to heavily.ANYWAY, I'm on this on to see if its something I'd want for parts, I'd LOVE to get a good pic of the hood and grille!Now to state the obvious, to me, the best Mopar small block model yet, has to go to the AMT '71 Plymouth Duster 340.... That car (I own 2 of those models) has an awesomely detailed "340" in it, BUT as a model would suffice to be anything from a 318 to a 360. that were the "LA" class motors from Mopar. AND if done right, you can add a 2 barrel intake, a 4 barrel intake or a 6 pack intake! -Unless I can see better detail revealing pics, I'd buy one of these kits for mere parts.... Not sure I'd go to build it....Trying to duplicate the 273 in my 1:1 66 Barracuda. So far I plan to use the AMT Duster 340 . Sound about right ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
426-Hemi Posted December 17, 2015 Share Posted December 17, 2015 Trying to duplicate the 273 in my 1:1 66 Barracuda. So far I plan to use the AMT Duster 340 . Sound about right ?Please go have a look at your PM's. I'll help ya the best I can! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Haigwood Posted December 17, 2015 Share Posted December 17, 2015 Please go have a look at your PM's. I'll help ya the best I can!Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
426-Hemi Posted December 17, 2015 Share Posted December 17, 2015 (edited) Your welcome! I have to say, I keep lookin' at this car, and I think that car front and hood resemble the '71 Demon too! HMMMM Edited December 17, 2015 by 426-Hemi I can't type! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
horsepower Posted December 18, 2015 Share Posted December 18, 2015 This was released in one incarnation as a Demon, I was digging through a box I had of some of the original kits I had that hadn't been finished and found two different front bumper grille assemblies, and it's supposed to be an 8 3/4" rear axle, but all the ones I saw in the real world had quick change rear ends, the best one for that is the one in the original AMT NASCAR truck kits. On the whole, they're actually a very accurate kit, the only sad thing is they never released one with the Challenger body option, there is an article in the old Stock Car Magazine on the development of the real car showing one of the test cars, a number 0 Challenger, it driven in the asphalt testing by Pete Hamilton, and on dirt by a new comer, an upcoming young driver named Dale Earnhardt, he wasn't a Sr. yet, and in a single car test somehow managed to bend up the front fenders on the new car. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asfastasu Posted December 18, 2015 Share Posted December 18, 2015 (edited) Like 70 Grande said, watch the front end of this car as the front tires stick out way too far and if I recall right they are not centered in the wheel opening(too far back I believe). The engine is a generic motors piece. IMHO the body is about the nicest piece in the kit. Good luck. Edited December 18, 2015 by asfastasu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldcarfan Posted December 18, 2015 Share Posted December 18, 2015 I plan to purchase a couple of copies of this kit. Are there pictures of other racers who used this platform? I haven't found any yet. Also, I am thinking of using one as the basis for a Nova sportsman on the order of Dale Earnhart's old racer. Suspension and engine would probably be different, but would it otherwise be viable? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rctruk Posted December 18, 2015 Share Posted December 18, 2015 Would this be the same car that was in the Petty hauler set? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afx Posted December 18, 2015 Share Posted December 18, 2015 Would this be the same car that was in the Petty hauler set? Yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rctruk Posted December 18, 2015 Share Posted December 18, 2015 Thanks JC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lordairgtar Posted December 18, 2015 Share Posted December 18, 2015 http://blog.hemmings.com/?p=568031&refer=newsArticle in Hemming's website about the car, and a Challenger in particular. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RancheroSteve Posted December 19, 2015 Share Posted December 19, 2015 Here's a shot of the #0 test car: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mopeyguy Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Van Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 Folks, I see that the new decal sheet allows the builder to construct either the #43 car or Joe Milikan's #04 that ran out of the Petty shops 'back in the day". The #43 car with Richard driving ran ONCE!! Joe ran the #04 car most of that season. The #43 was mainly a PR move to get people to buy the kit cars! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sledsel Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 looking forward to getting that one also Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZTony8 Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 I'm in the midst of building one of these and am confused as to the correct placement of the upper A arms.There are 3 notches on one side of the frame,one notch on the other side and nothing on the arms matches up to any of the notches.Do I assemble the front suspension from the bottom up and determine the placement that way or do something else?Hints,please. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.