jaxenro Posted January 21, 2017 Author Posted January 21, 2017 The newer version with the slight chop looks better. In my opinion the original chop ruined the proportions. It's going to take some playing. I think the original was too much but to me no chop looks like a Dr's car. Not sure why but that's what I think ofMaybe some side mount spares to take up some of that long hood. Plenty of room behind the front wheels and before the doors now
D. Battista Posted January 21, 2017 Posted January 21, 2017 (edited) Although I do think some chop helps with the long and lean look I think this looks better if thats the look your going for ...but if your going for the power look it needs some power wheels like some deep dish slotted mags... IMO Edited January 21, 2017 by D. Battista
keyser Posted January 21, 2017 Posted January 21, 2017 B&S Duesies some of the worst? Some of their work wasn't great. But see below. Mudd Coupe J212 J509 Murphy, I agree. Clear Vision Sedan. Brand new. Blackwalls. Polished alloy sweep, early grille. Low keyed and stunning.
jaxenro Posted January 21, 2017 Author Posted January 21, 2017 (edited) I think this looks better if thats the look your going for ...but if your going for the power look it needs some power wheels like some deep dish slotted mags... IMO Different power. Power today could be a short hood and a blown big block pushing 600 horsepower. Power in the 1930's usually meant a long hood with a straight 8 or V12 or V16 under itOr side pipes as in the SJ or Auburn. But I don't like side pipes except on ACD's and Early Mercedes I think the stance also needs to change. The nose down look that works so well on 32 Ford hot rods looks odd when the nose lengthensAnd what about power? The long hood needs to cover something longer. Two flatheads coupled in tandem to make a V16? Something modern and exotic? A war surplus Alison engine? Edited January 21, 2017 by jaxenro
jaxenro Posted January 21, 2017 Author Posted January 21, 2017 Isn't J509 Clark Gable's car he ended up leaving to rot in a field or something? Carole Lombard gave it to him and when she died in the plane crash he couldn't bear to look at itIt is a beautiful car
Scale-Master Posted January 21, 2017 Posted January 21, 2017 (edited) I thought the OP's modifications might work just fine, especially as a model. Made me think it could be a Lincoln or upscale version based on much of the same mechanicals. If there were a "Like" button I'd have used it a few times in this thread. And I'd probably still made the above comment... Edited January 21, 2017 by Scale-Master
Dodge Driver Posted January 21, 2017 Posted January 21, 2017 Different power. Power today could be a short hood and a blown big block pushing 600 horsepower. Power in the 1930's usually meant a long hood with a straight 8 or V12 or V16 under itOr side pipes as in the SJ or Auburn. But I don't like side pipes except on ACD's and Early Mercedes I think the stance also needs to change. The nose down look that works so well on 32 Ford hot rods looks odd when the nose lengthensAnd what about power? The long hood needs to cover something longer. Two flatheads coupled in tandem to make a V16? Something modern and exotic? A war surplus Alison engine? I agree on the stance change. Raise the nose some, and as Bill suggested upthread, a larger diameter front wheel/tire combo to fill the fenderwell.As for power, this intrigues me...http://www.clearlyscale.com/product/gm-ls-v12-tremec-6060-engine-set
Russell C Posted January 21, 2017 Posted January 21, 2017 Just kicking an idea .............. lengthened the hood and trunk and chopped the top....No doubt many have had this same overall idea, myself included. I've even gone so far as to acquire two kits to accomplish this (difference being both are rag tops), although with my own brand of demented twist to it. But it's just a collection of parts on the shelf for the time being.
Zoom Zoom Posted January 21, 2017 Posted January 21, 2017 I think it's a great idea; one I have had myself as well. Take the well-designed but "economy car of the day" proportions of the Ford and stretch them to classic proportions. The Ford is so clean, if it had classic proportions it would fit among the high-dollar, high-end classics.Now...get to building it!!
bobthehobbyguy Posted January 21, 2017 Posted January 21, 2017 I agree. Definitely a good looking project.
jaxenro Posted January 22, 2017 Author Posted January 22, 2017 (edited) Now...get to building it!! Maybe in a bit. Just got this as an early Christmas present and i am three months into the build - it was on sale then. Between this and a couple of other projects my build time for a new project is a year awayhttp://www.model-space.com/us/build-samurai-armor.html not mine but you can see the detail http://forum.us.model-space.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=6524 Edited January 22, 2017 by jaxenro
Jon Cole Posted January 22, 2017 Posted January 22, 2017 (edited) Long and low is the way to go. Always has been. Edited January 22, 2017 by Jon Cole
Spex84 Posted January 22, 2017 Posted January 22, 2017 Cool idea! I've picked up a deuce 3-window body as recently as a couple months ago, wondering if I could make it look more like a Mercedes, much like you've done here. Here's my first attempt to photo-chop it into a more "classic" shape, but keep the hot rod look:
D. Battista Posted January 22, 2017 Posted January 22, 2017 Cool idea!Here's my first attempt to photo-chop it into a more "classic" shape, but keep the hot rod look: That is really cool... Even with the baby moons... spoked wheels just didn't seem to go with it after it was streched.... Just my taste and opinion....
oldcarfan Posted January 22, 2017 Posted January 22, 2017 t looks sort of like one of those coach-built cars. Just need to turn that flathead V-8 turned into a V-16!
Zoom Zoom Posted January 22, 2017 Posted January 22, 2017 Love that! Gorgeous lines. Definitely has classic coachbuilt proportions. Goes without saying Ford had the right start but this takes it towards sublime.
Casey Posted January 22, 2017 Posted January 22, 2017 Slide the greenhouse forward, closer to the hood/cowl gap, and I think it looks more balanced.
jaxenro Posted January 22, 2017 Author Posted January 22, 2017 Personally I'd like to see it with the same size front and rear wheels and tires but it is heads and shoulders ahead of what I did. The back tire size is great but I don't like the big and littlesthe wheels work though
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now