Harry P. Posted October 1, 2007 Posted October 1, 2007 (edited) What do you think? The answer: REAL! Edited October 5, 2007 by harrypri
Slick Posted October 1, 2007 Posted October 1, 2007 I vote model because of the background. The car looks great.
kk916 Posted October 1, 2007 Posted October 1, 2007 I'm gonna be the odd guy out here and say its real. It just seems to obvious to be a model
dub Posted October 1, 2007 Posted October 1, 2007 Maybe Harry is going easy on us this week! I dunno, it sure looks like a model to me but, the background has been p-shopped... Maybe he's getting out the big guns because we have been tough to fool!!! I just don't wanna wait til friday
Harry P. Posted October 1, 2007 Author Posted October 1, 2007 Maybe I used a photo that looks like a model so you'll think that I'm trying to fool you by using a photo that's real but looks like a model...or maybe I'm trying to fool you by using a photo that looks like a model because it is a model and you'd think I wouldn't make it that easy so you'd vote real...or maybe the car is real but looks like a model so you'll vote model even if it's real...or maybe it's real but you vote model because...is your head spinning yet???
ismaelg Posted October 1, 2007 Posted October 1, 2007 I'd go real because of the reflections on the rear do not follow this light refraction pattern: but rather this other one where h(v) is a function of the distribution histogram: But on the other hand however, by applying the Jacobian transformation to the Gamma distribution: the result says possibly model. So bottom line: What the heck do I know? I guess real so I have a 50% chance Thanks,
Harry P. Posted October 1, 2007 Author Posted October 1, 2007 I'd go real because of the reflections on the rear do not follow this light refraction pattern: but rather this other one where h(v) is a function of the distribution histogram: But on the other hand however, by applying the Jacobian transformation to the Gamma distribution: the result says possibly model. So bottom line: What the heck do I know? I guess real so I have a 50% chance Thanks, Gotta love the scientific approach!
parki Posted October 1, 2007 Posted October 1, 2007 Oh my god guys! now I'm more than confused!? Who let Stephen hawking onto the forum? Anyways I'm going to say model. Just doesn't look real enough to me. But hey what do I know?
dub Posted October 1, 2007 Posted October 1, 2007 Maybe I used a photo that looks like a model so you'll think that I'm trying to fool you by using a photo that's real but looks like a model...or maybe I'm trying to fool you by using a photo that looks like a model because it is a model and you'd think I wouldn't make it that easy so you'd vote real...or maybe the car is real but looks like a model so you'll vote model even if it's real...or maybe it's real but you vote model because... Too funny! These words were floating around in my head as I typed the earlier response.
MrObsessive Posted October 1, 2007 Posted October 1, 2007 I'd go real because of the reflections on the rear do not follow this light refraction pattern: but rather this other one where h(v) is a function of the distribution histogram: But on the other hand however, by applying the Jacobian transformation to the Gamma distribution: the result says possibly model. So bottom line: What the heck do I know? I guess real so I have a 50% chance Thanks, !!! ??? hehehee OH! My vote?...............I was mesmerized by that Rube Goldbergish type formula!! Uh..............I vote model!
Peter Lombardo Posted October 1, 2007 Posted October 1, 2007 I voted model for two reasons. 1. I think the background is too far out of focus for a unretouched real car and 2. I do not see any nounting holes/brackets for the rear license plate. But I realize that you could have made the backgound out of focus intentionaly and you could have photoshopped the mounting holes out for the rear plate....so therefore in the end it is a guess. P.S. something about the breakline just in front of the left front fender looks more like the platform that a model would be sitting on then a road/sidewalk break. Ok, technically thats three reasons...shoot me. It's still just a guess.
Mr. Metallic Posted October 1, 2007 Posted October 1, 2007 (edited) perfect 6 for 6 so far, but I'm anticipating it coming to an end any day now. I say model and so it has, bummer. I can never be perfect again. Edited October 5, 2007 by Mr. Metallic
ABC Auto Industry Posted October 1, 2007 Posted October 1, 2007 I think it's a model because there's a little spot near the front bumper where the guy forgot to Photoshop the edge of the surface of whatever the car was standing on so it blended in with the road. Take a good look & you'll see what I mean.
Mr. Can Am Garage Posted October 1, 2007 Posted October 1, 2007 FWIW, I think Harry's using the wrong terminology for these quizzes. There's no question it's real. It's a question of SCALE.
owen Posted October 2, 2007 Posted October 2, 2007 (edited) I'm definitely in the minority, but I had to go real with this one. It looks like the license plate has been blanked out (would only need to happen to hide a real plate) It looks like maybe the forground was 'shopped in to look more model-ish. There is a....well, a pimple or something near the back edge of the door....would anyone detail the recessed lug nuts and leave a big 'ol bump like that in the side? I'm one for three and was totally guessing on the one, so the odds seem against me this time too *edit to add sig line* Edited October 2, 2007 by owen
Guest roadkill2525 Posted October 2, 2007 Posted October 2, 2007 Real or model it looks great, at least it's not a Mondail.
bartek Posted October 2, 2007 Posted October 2, 2007 What do I know? Model... I think. I'd like to have one looking so good...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now