Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

Best 1/25 Ford 351 Cleveland engine?


Recommended Posts

The AMT '73 Cougar kit has an excellent 351C.

I don't believe that's correct. IIRC, the engines are a 428 and a 429, neither of which is correct for a '73 Cougar. They were carried over from previous MPC Cougar kits.

Type Size Horsepower Years

ohv V-8 351 240/285* 1971

ohv V-8 429 370* 1971

ohv V-8 351 168/262/266** 1972

ohv V-8 351 168/264** 1973

Here's a resin source for a 351C: http://www.motorcityresincasters.com/motors.htm

The old AMT Warren Tope '73 Mustang race car has a 351C. I think the kit's been reissued as something else in the last couple years. (Kit historians, please chime in) From what I recall, you can't build the kit stock but you could probably make the engine streetable, if not 100% stock, with a regular or open element air cleaner and some exhaust manifolds.

Edited by Monty
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any Ford NASCAR kit from the eighties or nineties will have a Cleveland. The Boss 302 from the 69 Cougar mentioned above isn't bad either. Outside of those it's really hit or miss, a lot of seventies Ford kits have some variation of a Cleveland but most aren't very good and some are unusably bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rob, I've got one of those kits arriving this week so will double check. Monty, thanks for link, that looks like a good but expensive option. Steve and Brian, the Boss engine is wrong cos it a 302 Windsor short block which is too narrow and incorrect(timing cover area totally different)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a good look at the engine in the 73 Cougar and it looks like it's a 351c. The only thing that confuses me is that there is an optional version in the kit that builds up with Hemi ie Boss style heads. But valve cover, cyl head and exh manifold shape(in stock form) all point to a 351c - and not a bad one at that too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

post-13094-0-87314000-1421640047_thumb.jpost-13094-0-06778300-1421639185_thumb.jpost-13094-0-60856900-1421639198_thumb.jThe AMT 71-73 Mustang engine could pass for 351C with the correct Cleveland or Boss valve covers. Here is what a 351C is supposed to look like. One of the pictures is of an 1/8 model from down under. The Horsepower picture shows a 351C next to a 351W.

http://www.iconmodels.com.au/products/XY-Cleveland-351-Free-Standing-Engine-1%7B47%7D8.html

http://www.mustangengines.com/351c%20Differences.htm

Edited by vamach1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fred, the boss engine from the cougar is an awesome engine but wrong for a boss 351. The boss 302 was a Windsor short block with Cleveland cyl heads. The boss 351 was a Cleveland short block with Cleveland 4v cyl heads. The 302 is also narrow than the 351 too

Rex, the Motor city engine looks like it may be based on the 73 Cougar with some improvements/added detail

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't believe that's correct. IIRC, the engines are a 428 and a 429, neither of which is correct for a '73 Cougar. They were carried over from previous MPC Cougar kits.

Type Size Horsepower Years

ohv V-8 351 240/285* 1971

ohv V-8 429 370* 1971

ohv V-8 351 168/262/266** 1972

ohv V-8 351 168/264** 1973

Here's a resin source for a 351C: http://www.motorcityresincasters.com/motors.htm

The old AMT Warren Tope '73 Mustang race car has a 351C. I think the kit's been reissued as something else in the last couple years. (Kit historians, please chime in) From what I recall, you can't build the kit stock but you could probably make the engine streetable, if not 100% stock, with a regular or open element air cleaner and some exhaust manifolds.

It's possible you are correct. I got my info through the folks here, in this thread.

http://www.modelcarsmag.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=18730

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fred, the boss engine from the cougar is an awesome engine but wrong for a boss 351. The boss 302 was a Windsor short block with Cleveland cyl heads. The boss 351 was a Cleveland short block with Cleveland 4v cyl heads. The 302 is also narrow than the 351 too

Rex, the Motor city engine looks like it may be based on the 73 Cougar with some improvements/added detail

I'm fully aware of the parts makeup of Ford engines. I have a couple clevelands sitting here. In this scale the boss 302 would pass better than anything else in the boss 351. You could fudge it with a 385 series water pump to change up the look. A bit. The boss kit has a bunch of issues. Not just the engine lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm fully aware of the parts makeup of Ford engines. I have a couple clevelands sitting here. In this scale the boss 302 would pass better than anything else in the boss 351. You could fudge it with a 385 series water pump to change up the look. A bit. The boss kit has a bunch of issues. Not just the engine lol

Since no one has addressed my question at the bottom of post #6, would you mind sharing your opinion on the engine in the old '73 Warren Tope Trans Am - series Mustang or any of it's subsequent releases. The original box specified that it was a 351C, and as I told the OP, it could probably be made streetable with a different air cleaner and exhaust manifolds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's one good alternative and one that is a teaser.

One is from a 80's Mustang Cafe racer gluebomb I bought but it sure looks like a 351C with a C6 tranny and oversized carb to me.

The other picture is the engine from the Danbury mint Boss 351.post-13094-0-63054800-1421707578_thumb.jpost-13094-0-75651600-1421707586_thumb.jpost-13094-0-89043000-1421707977_thumb.j

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scale Modeling By Chris has a couple in resin.

http://www.scalemodelingbychris.com/smbc_partsp1.htm

Interesting. Looks exactly like the resin engine I mentioned in Post #6, offered by some other guys in Michigan.

http://www.motorcityresincasters.com/motors.htm

Makes me wonder what original kit engine these guys based their castings on.

Edited by Monty
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...