FORD REQUESTING NAMES FROM E-BAY FOR SELLERS OF UNLISCENSED NERCHANDISE
#1
Posted 24 May 2012 - 06:48 AM
#2
Posted 24 May 2012 - 06:51 AM
#4
Posted 24 May 2012 - 07:39 AM
#5
Posted 24 May 2012 - 08:05 AM
#6
Posted 24 May 2012 - 08:31 AM
IS THIS STORY TRUE? I HEARD IT ON THE NEWS YESTERDAY!
Sounds like it is, but it's only for 13 users:
""Ford Motor Co. wants eBay and PayPal to turn over data on 13 users the automaker accuses of selling fake or unlicensed Ford parts on the online auction site,"
#7
Posted 24 May 2012 - 08:36 AM
#8
Posted 24 May 2012 - 08:37 AM
#9
Posted 24 May 2012 - 08:49 AM
Edited by Darren B, 24 May 2012 - 08:51 AM.
#10
Posted 24 May 2012 - 09:42 AM
#11
Posted 24 May 2012 - 09:45 AM
#12
Posted 24 May 2012 - 09:52 AM
#13
Posted 25 May 2012 - 03:54 PM
#14
Posted 25 May 2012 - 05:14 PM
How long do you think it will be, before they go afer resin casters decal makers...etc.
That's already been happening. If you look at an earlier thread on this forum from a few months ago, you'll see that one of our members - a guy with a small home business making scale truck decals - was pounced on by Kenworth, who sent him a cease-and-desist letter, which he reproduced on this forum. They told him to stop making Kenworth logo decals and to destroy all of his existing inventory, which he did.
#15
Posted 25 May 2012 - 07:26 PM
#16
Posted 25 May 2012 - 08:18 PM
Darrin, it's easier to counterfit parts than one may imagine . Using cheaper materials , not certifying it through D O T regulations , not even using enough material so as to do a function properly. One example was when the dallas Morning News newspaper discovered a load of A/C filters that didn't have enough paper in them to even bother filtering motor oil once . Several Big Chain stores in the Dallas area were finially alerted as to a shipment of filters that were discovered as Chineese manufactured . Ed Shaver
I seem to remember reading something in Hot Rod back in the 80's about how the Big Three going after companies that were doing things like that and then putting the automakers' parts division's name on them and selling those through flea markets and such. IIRC it even forced Mopar to change the box graphics to something that was trickier to copy.
Cheap knock-off sheetmetal parts have been used by shady auto body shops for years. They cost less, but they charge the customer for OEM replacement parts.
Not sure if it's still the case, but State Farm used to insist that those parts be used on non-premium (as in not Lexus, Caddy, Merc, BMW, ect) cars and trucks so they could save money. Back in the mid 90's one of the local news channels (either NBC 5 or ABC 7) did an investigation and talked to owners who wrecked their "lesser" cars that were repaired with cheap parts. Some testing company even showed how poor of quality these parts were by taking a second gen Taurus and putting the State Farm prefered front bumper on it, hitting it with some kind of pneumatic ram in a way to simulate a parking lot oops which shattered it, then did the same with a Ford stock replacement and it just flexed and returned to it's original shape.
IIRC in some cases they still want the body shops to use serviceable junkyard parts where ever possible to save themselves money too.
#17
Posted 26 May 2012 - 01:49 AM
That's already been happening. If you look at an earlier thread on this forum from a few months ago, you'll see that one of our members - a guy with a small home business making scale truck decals - was pounced on by Kenworth, who sent him a cease-and-desist letter, which he reproduced on this forum. They told him to stop making Kenworth logo decals and to destroy all of his existing inventory, which he did.
Most copyright fine print usually say something like "this logo may not be reproduced without the consent of the owner". I'm sure if this member made the odd logo on personal projects, Kenworth probably wouldn't have cared as much. Not knowing too much about the specifics of this example, this quote implies that this member was reproducing the logos without permison for profit. You simply can't do that and Kenworth would be within their right to ask him to stop. I would be pissed if someone was selling decals with my name on them without my permision too.
Now the ethics of going after a scale modle usiness vs. an 3rd party counterfit part suplier is a completely different topic....
#18
Posted 26 May 2012 - 02:02 AM
http://www.brandchan...ogo-052212.aspx
#19
Posted 26 May 2012 - 02:20 AM
The two companies that I know of that are probably the must agressive in copyright infringement are Caterpiller & Harley-Davidson. In fact, the Pentagon was even getting involved with this for military models. They wanted the model manufacturers to pay a fee to reproduce their equipment. That made military modelers "really happy"!
#20
Posted 26 May 2012 - 03:44 AM
I'm pretty certain insurance laws differ from one state to another.IIRC in some cases they still want the body shops to use serviceable junkyard parts where ever possible to save themselves money too.
In 2006, someone rammed the back of my 2004 Dakota and bent the rear bumper. I was told that NY State law allows the insurance company's estimate to include used OEM parts if: (a) the vehicle is not "current year" (2006 in my case), or (if it is "current year" but has more than 5,000 miles on it. In my case, they could not locate a suitable used bumper, so they had to pay for a new one. While checking prices on used vs. new bumpers, most of the used ones I came across included in their description the disclaimer "not suitable for insurance repair". I don't know what that encompassed, possibly these units had been bent previously and then straightened. Used bumpers that would have been acceptable were priced the same as new ones (or so close that shipping would have made them cost more).
Sometimes the OEM parts aren't kept in stock very long, so used and aftermarket are the only available options. My niece's 2003 Cavalier was struck and nearly totalled (really should have been; the estimate was within a couple hundred dollars of a total loss...and after repairs were started, additional work had to be done that pushed the total higher). This was in 2006 or 2007. Even then, a new front bumper fascia wasn't available from GM, and at the time no good used front end sheetmetal was available in the area. So she got new sheetmetal but an aftermarket fascia, which differs visibly in some minor detail.
In a case where only the fascia would be damaged (and none of the sheetmetal) the auto parts dealer will rarely split up the complete front end to sell just the fascia, headlamp(s), or one fender. The whole will often be worth more than the sum of the parts, and will be easier to sell.












